<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lexrussica</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Lex russica</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Lex Russica</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1729-5920</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-7869</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/1729-5920.2020.166.9.108-118</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lexrussica-1536</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КИБЕРПРОСТРАНСТВО / CYBERSPACE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CYBERSPACE / CYBERSPACE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Право сетевого общества и проблема управления гибридностью</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Law of the Network Society and the Problem of Hybridity Management</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мажорина</surname><given-names>М. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mazhorina</surname><given-names>M. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Мажорина Мария Викторовна, кандидат юридических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры международного частного права </p><p>Садовая-Кудринская ул., д. 9, г. Москва, 125993 </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mariya V. Mazhorina, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of International Law </p><p>ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">mvmazhorina@msal.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>73</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>108</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Мажорина М.В., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Мажорина М.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Mazhorina M.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/1536">https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/1536</self-uri><abstract><p>Сетевое общество, актуальное для социального ландшафта XXI в., предопределяет выстраивание новой архитектуры права. Современная правовая карта мира крайне неоднородна и зачастую не совпадает с политической картой мира. Она пестрит самыми разными нормативными массивами, которые коллидируют друг с другом, наслаиваются друг на друга, в то время как традиционная правовая методология не всегда способна разрешить возникающие коллизии. Значительный потенциал обретает проблема коллизии права и неправа ввиду стремительного разрастания неправовой материи и появления легитимизирующих ее институций. Ситуация осложняется одновременным существованием нескольких институциональных систем разрешения споров (государственных, негосударственных, альтернативных, платформенных), которые обращаются к совершенно разным, относительно автономным подсистемам норм как к применимому праву. Такая материальная и институциональная фрагментация, появление гибридных нормативных и институциональных режимов провоцируют активный поиск новых принципов построения правовой архитектуры, адекватной столь быстро меняющемуся обществу. Глобализация трансформируется в сетевизацию, которая переопределяет географию мира, известные и традиционные принципы аффилиации субъектов права, а следом обостряет полемику о правовой таксономии. Обозначенная эволюция правовой надстройки также порождает новые типы коллизий, побуждая к поиску новой или адаптации известной методологии для целей их преодоления.</p><p>работе предпринимается попытка исследовать новую нормативность в условиях новой социальности, определить ключевые тренды развития права сетевого общества, спрогнозировать развитие отдельных правовых и субправовых институтов, смоделировать правовые способы управления гибридностью.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The network society, which is relevant to the social landscape of the 21st century, determines the building of a new architecture of law. The current legal map of the world is extremely heterogeneous and often does not coincide with the political map of the world. It is full of a variety of normative arrays that collide with each other, layered on top of each other, while the traditional legal methodology is not always able to resolve conflicts that arise. The problem of controversy between law and not law is gaining considerable potential due to the rapid growth of non-legal matter and the emergence of legitimizing institutions. The situation is complicated by the simultaneous existence of several institutional dispute resolution systems (state, non-state, alternative, platform-based) that refer to completely different, relatively autonomous subsystems of norms as applicable law. Such material and institutional fragmentation, the emergence of hybrid regulatory and institutional regimes has provoked an active search for new principles of building a legal architecture that is adequate to such a rapidly changing society. Globalization is transforming into networking, which redefines the geography of the world, the well-known and traditional principles of affiliation of legal entities, and then exacerbates the debates about legal taxonomy. The marked evolution of the legal superstructure also generates new types of conflicts, prompting the search for a new or adaptation of the known methodology in order to overcome them.</p><p>The paper attempts to explore the new normativity in the context of a new sociality, to identify key trends in the development of the law of a network society, to predict the development of individual legal and sub-legal institutions, and to model legal ways of managing hybridity.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>сеть</kwd><kwd>сетевое право</kwd><kwd>глобальное право</kwd><kwd>транснациональное право</kwd><kwd>международное частное право</kwd><kwd>негосударственное регулирование</kwd><kwd>коллизия права и неправа</kwd><kwd>lex mercatoria</kwd><kwd>платформенное право</kwd><kwd>международный коммерческий арбитраж</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>network</kwd><kwd>network law</kwd><kwd>global law</kwd><kwd>transnational law</kwd><kwd>private international law</kwd><kwd>non-state regulation</kwd><kwd>controversy between law and not law</kwd><kwd>lex mercatoria</kwd><kwd>platform law</kwd><kwd>international commercial arbitration</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 18-29-16061.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-29-16061.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Войниканис Е. А. Парадигмальный сдвиг в современном праве // Философия политики и права : сборник научных работ. — М. : Изд. А. В. Воробьев, 2010. — Вып. 1. — С. 138—161.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voynikanis EA. Paradigmalnyy sdvig v sovremennom prave [Paradigm shift in modern law]. In: Filosofiya politiki i prava: sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Philosophy of politics and law: collection of papers]. Moscow: A. V. Vorobyov Publishing House; 2010;1:138-161. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зорькин В. Д. Право в условиях глобальных перемен. — М. : Норма, 2013. — 496 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zorkin VD. Pravo v usloviyakh globalnykh peremen [Law in the conditions of global changes]. Moscow: Norma; 2013. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хабриева Т. Я. Циклические нормативные массивы в праве // Журнал российского права. — 2019. — № 12. — С. 5—18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khabrieva TYa. Tsiklicheskie normativnye massivy v prave [Cyclical normative arrays in law]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2019;12:5-18. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хабриева Т. Я., Черногор Н. Н. Право в условиях цифровой реальности // Журнал российского права. — 2018. — № 1. — С. 85—102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khabrieva TYa, Chernogor NN. Pravo v usloviyakh tsifrovoy realnosti [Law in the conditions of digital reality]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2018;1:85-102. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berman P. S. Global Legal Pluralism // Southern California Law Abstract. — 2007. — Vol. 80. — Pр. 1155—2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berman PS. Global Legal Pluralism. Southern California Law Abstract. 2007;80:1155-2007. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berman P. S. Towards a Cosmopolitan Vision of Conflict of Laws: Redefining Governmental Interests in a Global Era // University of Pennsylvania Law Abstract. — 2005. — Vol. 153. — Рр. 1819—1882.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berman PS. Towards a Cosmopolitan Vision of Conflict of Laws: Redefining Governmental Interests in a Global Era. University of Pennsylvania Law Abstract. 2005;153:1819-1882. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Castells M. The Information Age. Economy, Society, and Culture. The Rise of the Network Society. — Second edition with a new preface. — Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Castells M. The Information Age. Economy, Society, and Culture. The Rise of the Network Society. Second edition with a new preface. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cotterrell R. What Is Transnational Law? // Law &amp; Social Inquiry. — 2012. — Vol. 37. — Iss. 2. — Рp. 500—524.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cotterrell R. What Is Transnational Law? Law &amp; Social Inquiry. 2012;37(2):500-524. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De Carolis D. The process of harmonisatin of the law of international commercial arbitration: drafting and diffusion of uniform norms. Doctoral Thesis // URL: http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/214/1/dissertation.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De Carolis D. The process of harmonisation of the law of international commercial arbitration: drafting and diffusion of uniform norms. Doctoral Thesis. Available from: http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/214/1/dissertation.pdf. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fischer-Lescano A., Teubner G. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law // Michigan Journal of International Law. — 2004. — Vol. 25. — Pp. 999—1046.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fischer-Lescano A, Teubner G. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 2004;25:999-1046. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Katyal S. K., Grinvald L. C. Platform Law and the Brand Enterprise // Berkeley Technology Law Journal. — 2017. — Vol. 32. — Pp. 1135—1182.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katyal SK, Grinvald LC. Platform Law and the Brand Enterprise. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 2017;32:1135-1182. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lobel O. The Law of the Platform // Minnesota Law Abstract. — 2016. — Vol. 101. — Pp. 87—166.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lobel O. The Law of the Platform. Minnesota Law Abstract. 2016;101:87-166. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michaels R. The Re-State-Ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global Legal Pluralism // Wayne Law Abstract. — 2005. — Vol. 51. — Pp. 1209—1259.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michaels R. The Re-State-Ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global Legal Pluralism. Wayne Law Abstract. 2005;51:1209-1259. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Teubner G. Breaking Frames: Globalization and the Emergence of Lex mercatoria // European Journal of Social Theory. — 2002. — Vol. 5. — No. 2. — Pp. 205—211.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teubner G. Breaking Frames: Globalization and the Emergence of Lex mercatoria. European Journal of Social Theory. 2002;5(2):205-211. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Teubner G. Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Fragmentation of World Society // URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228241875_Two_Kinds_of_Legal_Pluralism_Collision_of_Transnational_Regimes_in_the_Double_Fragmentation_of_World_Society.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teubner G. Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Fragmentation of World Society. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228241875_Two_Kinds_of_Legal_Pluralism_Collision_of_Transnational_Regimes_in_the_Double_Fragmentation_of_World_Society. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
