<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lexrussica</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Lex russica</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Lex Russica</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1729-5920</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-7869</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lexrussica-181</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДИСЦИПЛИНАРНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Правовая лингвистика в судопроизводстве</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Forensic Linguistics In Legal Proceedings</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Галяшина</surname><given-names>Е. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Galyashina</surname><given-names>E. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">EIGALJASHINA@msal.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>136</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Галяшина Е.И., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Галяшина Е.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Galyashina E.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/181">https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/181</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье содержится подробное исследование применения судебной лингвистической экспертизы судебных документов, письменных показаний и показаний в устной форме, используемых в качестве доказательств в российском судопроизводстве. Утверждается, что за последние 15 лет существенно увеличилось число случаев использования показаний экспертов в качестве доказательств. Адвокаты, юристы, полицейские, судьи могут использовать лингвистическую экспертизу как средство разрешения дела. В статье освещаются основные вопросы применения судебной экспертизы: от особенностей юридической терминологии и интерференции языка и права до порядка сбора и проверки устных показаний в зале суда. Автор уделяет особое внимание уголовным и гражданским делам, в том числе большому числу преступлений и деликтов, совершенных посредством лингвистических средств: мошенничества, взяточничество, угрозы, терроризм и экстремизм, требования выкупа, клевета, диффамация, подстрекательство, оскорбления и др. В статье подчеркивается, что с помощью судебной лингвистической экспертизы можно получить важные доказательства, которые помогут избавиться от двусмысленности, искажений, лингвистических манипуляций в делах, в которых намеренно создается впечатление о виновности пострадавших, человек был спровоцирован к совершению преступных действий или принужден к ложному признанию своей вины вербальными средствами. В целом статья является попыткой рассмотреть широкий спектр проблем, связанных с судебной лингвистической экспертизой и ее практическим применением правоохранительными органами в правовом процессе.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article provides a detailed study of forensic application of linguistic examination of judicial documents, written speech and oral discourse materials involved as evidence in Russian legal proceedings. It is stated that usage of forensic expert evidence in court has increased rapidly in the past fifteen years. Lawyers, attorneys, police officers, judges can seek for linguistic evidence as remedy to solve the case. The article covers the key topics of the forensic linguistic field from legal language and interface between language and the law to the collection and testing of verbal evidence in the courtroom. The author focuses on criminal and civil cases involving a variety of crimes and other delicts conducted via usage of language, such as fraud, bribery, threats, terrorism and extremism, ransom demands, slander, calumny, seditions, abuses and many others. It is pointed that forensic linguistic expertise provides important evidence that can help to reveal ambiguity, disguise, language manipulations in cases when an impression of the targets' guilt is intentionally created or a person has been provoked for crime actions or verbally forced to make false confession. In summary, the article represents an attempt to provide a wide spectrum overview of concerns of forensic linguistics and its practical application in legal process by law enforcements.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>судебная экспертиза</kwd><kwd>судебная лингвистическая экспертиза</kwd><kwd>судопроизводство</kwd><kwd>язык и право</kwd><kwd>правоприменение</kwd><kwd>преступное высказывание</kwd><kwd>вербальное доказательство</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>orensics</kwd><kwd>forensic linguistics</kwd><kwd>legal proceedings</kwd><kwd>language and the law</kwd><kwd>law enforcement</kwd><kwd>speech crime</kwd><kwd>verbal evidence</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galyashina E. I. Preliminaries in Forensic Speech Science. Moscow: Stency, 2003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyashina E. I. Preliminaries in Forensic Speech Science. Moscow: Stency, 2003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Theory and Practice of Linguistic Analysis of Newspaper Texts in Forensic Expertise and Mass-media Conflicts: The materials of a science and practice seminar. Moscow, 7-8 December 2002 г. Part 2. М.: Galeria, 2003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Theory and Practice of Linguistic Analysis of Newspaper Texts in Forensic Expertise and Mass-media Conflicts: The materials of a science and practice seminar. Moscow, 7-8 December 2002 г. Part 2. М.: Galeria, 2003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coulthard M., Jonson A. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. Routledge. London and New York, 2007. P. 6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coulthard M., Jonson A. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. Routledge. London and New York, 2007. P. 6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Words' Value: Linguistic Expert Opinion Requested in Connection with Honor, Dignity and Business Reputation Defense, Claims Against the Media. Sec. ed. M.: Galeria, 2002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Words' Value: Linguistic Expert Opinion Requested in Connection with Honor, Dignity and Business Reputation Defense, Claims Against the Media. Sec. ed. M.: Galeria, 2002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">LeRoy Miller R. Business Law Today: The Essentials. United States: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2011. P. 127</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">LeRoy Miller R. Business Law Today: The Essentials. United States: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2011. P. 127</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OSCE Report - Libel and Insult Laws: a matrix on where we stand and what we would like to achieve. Defamation Act, 2013</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OSCE Report - Libel and Insult Laws: a matrix on where we stand and what we would like to achieve. Defamation Act, 2013</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Criminal Libel Act, 1819; Defamation Act, 1996, 2013</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Criminal Libel Act, 1819; Defamation Act, 1996, 2013</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edwards L. L., Edwards J. S., Wells P. K. Tort Law for Legal Assistants. Cengage Learning, 2008. P. 390. Lamoureux E. L., Baron S. L., Stewart C. Intellectual property law and interactive media: free for a fee. Peter Lang, 2009. P. 190</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edwards L. L., Edwards J. S., Wells P. K. Tort Law for Legal Assistants. Cengage Learning, 2008. P. 390. Lamoureux E. L., Baron S. L., Stewart C. Intellectual property law and interactive media: free for a fee. Peter Lang, 2009. P. 190</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Recent Developments in Forensic Linguistics / ed. By Hannes Kniffka in cooperation with Susan Blackwell and Malcolm Coulhard. Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; New York; Paris; Wien: Lang, 1996. P. 29</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Recent Developments in Forensic Linguistics / ed. By Hannes Kniffka in cooperation with Susan Blackwell and Malcolm Coulhard. Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; New York; Paris; Wien: Lang, 1996. P. 29</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Points 18-19 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from December 21, 2010 № 28, Moscow. «On forensic examination in criminal cases»</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Points 18-19 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from December 21, 2010 № 28, Moscow. «On forensic examination in criminal cases»</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gibbom J. Forensic Linguistics / An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell. UK., 2003. P. 281</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibbom J. Forensic Linguistics / An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell. UK., 2003. P. 281</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Authorship Expertise of Internet Communication: Legal and Methodical Problems // Lex Russica. 2015. Т. CI. № 4. Pp. 89-95</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Authorship Expertise of Internet Communication: Legal and Methodical Problems // Lex Russica. 2015. Т. CI. № 4. Pp. 89-95</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cotterill J. Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the O. J. Simpson Trial. - Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cotterill J. Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the O. J. Simpson Trial. - Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coulthard M. On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts // The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. - 1994. - 1 (1). - Pp. 27-43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coulthard M. On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts // The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. - 1994. - 1 (1). - Pp. 27-43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coulthard M. and Cotterill J. Introducing Forensic Linguistics. - Routledge, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coulthard M. and Cotterill J. Introducing Forensic Linguistics. - Routledge, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fifty Years of Forensic Science / Ed. Niamh Nic Daeid; Centre for Forensic Science, University of Strathclyde. - Glasgow, UK. - 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fifty Years of Forensic Science / Ed. Niamh Nic Daeid; Centre for Forensic Science, University of Strathclyde. - Glasgow, UK. - 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Linguistic Examinations in Trade Mark Disputes // The Russian Laws. Experience. Analysis. Practice. - 2006. - № 12 (December). - Pp. 77-94.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Linguistic Examinations in Trade Mark Disputes // The Russian Laws. Experience. Analysis. Practice. - 2006. - № 12 (December). - Pp. 77-94.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Civil Proceedings // The Russian Laws. Experience. Analysis. Practice. - 2015. - № 10 (October). - Pp. 17-22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Linguistic Expertise in Civil Proceedings // The Russian Laws. Experience. Analysis. Practice. - 2015. - № 10 (October). - Pp. 17-22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Authorship Expertise of Internet Communication: Legal and Methodological Problems // Lex Russica. - 2015. - Т. CI. - № 4. - Pp. 89-95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Authorship Expertise of Internet Communication: Legal and Methodological Problems // Lex Russica. - 2015. - Т. CI. - № 4. - Pp. 89-95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Expertise of Verbal Extremism // Expert-criminalist. - 2009. - № 2. - Pp. 14-16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Expertise of Verbal Extremism // Expert-criminalist. - 2009. - № 2. - Pp. 14-16.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Speech Expertises: from Theory to Practice // Expert-criminalist. - 2015. - № 2. - Pp. 28-31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galyashina E. I. Forensic Speech Expertises: from Theory to Practice // Expert-criminalist. - 2015. - № 2. - Pp. 28-31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goddard C. Can linguists help judges know what they mean? Linguistic semantics in the court-room // International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. - 1996. - № 3 (2). - Pp. 250-272.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goddard C. Can linguists help judges know what they mean? Linguistic semantics in the court-room // International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. - 1996. - № 3 (2). - Pp. 250-272.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hale S. Clash of world perspectives: the discursive practices of the law, witness and interpreter // International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. - 1997. - № 4 (2). - Pp. 197-209.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hale S. Clash of world perspectives: the discursive practices of the law, witness and interpreter // International Journal of Speech Language and the Law. - 1997. - № 4 (2). - Pp. 197-209.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mc Menamin G. Forensic Linguistics: advances in forensic stylistics. - Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mc Menamin G. Forensic Linguistics: advances in forensic stylistics. - Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Olsson J. Forensic Linguistics: An introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. - London: Continuum, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Olsson J. Forensic Linguistics: An introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. - London: Continuum, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Olsson J. and Luchjenbroers J. Forensic Linguistics. - 3 ed. - Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Olsson J. and Luchjenbroers J. Forensic Linguistics. - 3 ed. - Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Olsson J. Wordcrime: Solving Crime Through Forensic Linguistics. - Reprint edition. - Continuum, 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Olsson J. Wordcrime: Solving Crime Through Forensic Linguistics. - Reprint edition. - Continuum, 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics) / Ed. by M. Coulthard, A. Johnson. - Reprint edition. - Routledge, 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics) / Ed. by M. Coulthard, A. Johnson. - Reprint edition. - Routledge, 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stratman J. A Forensic Linguistic Approach to Legal Disclosures: ERISA Cash Balance Conversion Cases and the Contextual Dynamics of Deception // Routledge Studies in Linguistics, 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stratman J. A Forensic Linguistic Approach to Legal Disclosures: ERISA Cash Balance Conversion Cases and the Contextual Dynamics of Deception // Routledge Studies in Linguistics, 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
