<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lexrussica</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Lex russica</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Lex Russica</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1729-5920</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-7869</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lexrussica-581</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЕ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>NOVUS LEX</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ДИАЛОГ И ДОВЕРИЕ: ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЕ НОРМЫ И ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРАКТИКИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>A DIALOGUE AND TRUST: LEGAL NORMS AND POLITICAL PRACTICES</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Володина</surname><given-names>С. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Volodina</surname><given-names>S. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">Lana1331@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>08</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>88</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Володина С.В., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Володина С.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Volodina S.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/581">https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/581</self-uri><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The author’s attention is focused on the dialogue as the most important mechanism facilitating the formation of trust in politics. A detailed resort to modern social and political realities makes it possible to identify the reasons for the dynamics of trust depending on the socio-cultural environment, political processes and legal regulation. On the one hand, dialogue mechanisms of trust assume openness, creativity, dynamics, due to which trust becomes a “constructor” of the political and legal environment. This allows the dialogue to be a mobile construction that is adaptive to external risks. On the other hand, trust in the socio-political environment is determined by institutions and is impossible without following clear rules, norms, procedures. The article examines the factor of distrust that plays not only a destructive role, but also a positive role of “insuring” subjects of political and legal relations. “The right to distrust” is one of the elements of democracy, and “inevitability”of trust is manifested in the need to find compromises in a pluralistic environment of a democratic society. By singling out a homogeneous and heterogeneous trust environment, the author justifies the priority of the latter. At the same time, the democratic environment of trust presupposes the effects of “forced” trust, when it is formed under the conditions of limited choice. An indicator that shows trust/distrust on behalf of the authorities in relation to the civil society and vice versa is the electoral system.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>right</kwd><kwd>trust</kwd><kwd>politics</kwd><kwd>dialogue</kwd><kwd>distrust</kwd><kwd>civil society</kwd><kwd>elections</kwd><kwd>absenteeism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Петербургский международный экономический форум // URL: https://www.forumspb.com/?lang=ru (дата обращения: 27 мая 2018 г.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Петербургский международный экономический форум // URL: https://www.forumspb.com/?lang=ru (дата обращения: 27 мая 2018 г.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клецкова И. М. О некоторых аспектах понимания философии диалога М. М. Бахтина // Философия и социальные науки. - 2013. - № 3/4. - С. 31-35.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Клецкова И. М. О некоторых аспектах понимания философии диалога М. М. Бахтина // Философия и социальные науки. - 2013. - № 3/4. - С. 31-35.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Международные избирательные стандарты. - М., 2004. - 1152 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Международные избирательные стандарты. - М., 2004. - 1152 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рахманин В. С. Диалог политических культур как демократический процесс // Логос. - 2005. - № 4 (49). - С. 243-252.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Рахманин В. С. Диалог политических культур как демократический процесс // Логос. - 2005. - № 4 (49). - С. 243-252.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фомина М. Н., Борисенко О. А. От диалога к политическому диалогу: методологические подходы к исследованию // Вестник ЗабГУ. - 2013. - № 10 (101). - С. 117-122.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Фомина М. Н., Борисенко О. А. От диалога к политическому диалогу: методологические подходы к исследованию // Вестник ЗабГУ. - 2013. - № 10 (101). - С. 117-122.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Штомпка П. Доверие - основа общества. - М.: Логос, 2012. - 440 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Штомпка П. Доверие - основа общества. - М.: Логос, 2012. - 440 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Конституции государств (стран) мира // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/?p=534 (дата обращения: 21 мая 2018 г.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Конституции государств (стран) мира // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/?p=534 (дата обращения: 21 мая 2018 г.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
