<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lexrussica</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Lex russica</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Lex Russica</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1729-5920</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-7869</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/1729-5920.2019.152.7.093-107</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lexrussica-852</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КИБЕРПРОСТРАНСТВО / CYBERSPACE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CYBERSPACE / CYBERSPACE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title> О коллизии права и «неправа», реновации lex mercatoria,  смарт-контрактах и блокчейн-арбитраже</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Conflict-Of-Law and "Non Law" Renovation of the Lex Mercatoria,  Smart Contracts and Blockchain Arbitration</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мажорина</surname><given-names>М. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mazhorina</surname><given-names>M. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Мажорина Мария Викторовна, кандидат юридических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры международного частного права </p><p>125993,  г. Москва, ул. Садовая-Кудринская, д. 9</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mazhorina Maria Viktorovna, PhD in Law, Docent, Associate Professor of the Department  of International Private Law </p><p>125993,  Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">mvmazhorina@msal.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина  (МГЮА)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>07</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>93</fpage><lpage>107</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Мажорина М.В., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Мажорина М.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Mazhorina M.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/852">https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/852</self-uri><abstract><p>Центральный институт международного частного права — коллизия права — в современном глобализационно-информационном контексте эволюционирует, что во многом обусловлено парадигмальными сдвигами в правопонимании, заложенными и развиваемыми на почве международного коммерческого арбитража. Широко толкуемый концепт «нормы права» актуализирует совершенно новый взгляд на коллидирующие массивы норм: право государства и систему негосударственных регуляторов. Средневековое lex mercatoria, возрожденное в XX в., осовременивается киберпространством, приобретает новое звучание в форме e-merchant или lex informatica, особенно в контексте параллельного развития смарт-контрактов и новых децентрализованных форм разрешения спора, одной из которых выступает блокчейн-арбитраж. В частности, вопросы коллизии права, традиционные для трансграничных сделок, возникают и в отношении смарт-контрактов, которые, используя технологию блокчейн, имманентно связаны с несколькими юрисдикциями. Требуют осмысления вопросы применимости традиционных коллизионных привязок к регулированию соответствующих отношений, в том числе посредством прогнозирования практики выбора права того или иного государства, материальные нормы которого адаптированы к применению новых технологий, или обращения к нормам негосударственного регулирования.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The central institute of private international law — conflict of law — in the modern globalization and information context is evolving, which is largely due to the paradigm shifts in law, laid down and developed based on international commercial arbitration. The widely interpreted concept of «rules of law» actualizes a completely new view of conflicting arrays of rules: the law of the state and the system of non-state regulators. The medieval lex mercatoria, revived in the XX century, is modernized by cyberspace, acquires a new sound in the form of e-merchant or lex informatica, especially in the context of the parallel development of smart contracts and new decentralized forms of dispute resolution, one of which is blockchain arbitration. In particular, the issues of conflict of law, traditional for cross-border transactions, arise in relation to smart contracts, which, using blockchain technology, are inherently linked to several jurisdictions. It is important to reflect on the questions of applicability of traditional conflict-of-laws bindings to the regulation of relevant relations, including through forecasting the practice of choosing the law of a state, the substantive rules of which are adapted to the use of new technologies, or recourse to the rules of non-state regulation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>международное частное право</kwd><kwd>lex mercatoria</kwd><kwd>e-merchant</kwd><kwd>киберпространство</kwd><kwd>lex informatica</kwd><kwd>lex cryptographica</kwd><kwd>смарт-контракты</kwd><kwd>блокчейн-арбитраж</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>international private law</kwd><kwd>lex mercatoria</kwd><kwd>e-merchant</kwd><kwd>cyberspace</kwd><kwd>lex informatica</kwd><kwd>lex cryptography</kwd><kwd>smart contracts</kwd><kwd>blockchain arbitration</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований  (РФФИ) в рамках научно-исследовательского проекта РФФИ «Сетевое право в условиях сетевого общества: новые регуляторные модели», проект № 18-29-16061, реализуемого по результатам конкурса на  лучшие научные проекты междисциплинарных фундаментальных исследований (код конкурса 26-816  «Трансформация права в условиях развития цифровых технологий»). </funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The paper is prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), Research  Project «Network Law in a Network Society: new regulatory models», Project No. 18-29-16061 implemented  according to the results of the competition for the best research projects of interdisciplinary fundamental  researches (code of the competition 26-816 «Transformation of law in the context of the development of  digital technologies»). </funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Асосков А. В. Коллизионное регулирование договорных обязательств. — М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Asoskov A.V. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovornykh obyazatelstv [Conflict regulation of contractual  obligations]. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ., 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мажорина М. В. Международное частное право в условиях глобализации: от разгосударствления к фрагментации // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. — 2018. — № 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazhorina M.V. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo v usloviyakh globalizatsii: ot razgosudarstvleniya k fragmentatsii [Private international law in the context of globalization: from fragmentation to privatization].  Pravo. Zhurnal vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. [Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2018. No. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мажорина М. В. Цифровые платформы и международное частное право, или Есть ли будущее у киберправа? // Lex Russica. — 2019. — № 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazhorina M.V. Tsifrovye platformy i mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo, ili est li budushchee u kiberprava? [Digital platforms and international private law, or does cyber law have a future?]. Lex Russica. 2019. No. 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berman P. S. Towards a Cosmopolitan Vision of Conflict of Laws: Redefining Governmental Interests in a Global Era // University of Pennsylvania Law Abstract. — 2005. — Vol. 153.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berman P.S. Towards a Cosmopolitan Vision of Conflict of Laws: Redefining Governmental Interests in a Global  Era. University of Pennsylvania Law Abstract. 2005. Vol. 153.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dispute Revolution. The Kleros Handbook of Decentralized Justice // URL: https://blog.kleros.io/disputerevolution-the-kleros-handbook-of-decentralized-justice/ (дата обращения: 15.04.2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dispute Revolution. The Kleros Handbook of Decentralized Justice. URL: https://blog.kleros.io/disputerevolution-the-kleros-handbook-of-decentralized-justice/ (accessed: 15.04.2019).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Filippi P. de. From Lex Mercatoria to Lex Cryptographica // Dispute Revolution. The Kleros Handbook of Decentralized Justice. URL: https://blog.kleros.io/dispute-revolution-the-kleros-handbook-of-decentralizedjustice/ (дата обращения: 15.04.2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Filippi P. de. From Lex Mercatoria to Lex Cryptographica. Dispute Revolution. The Kleros Handbook of  Decentralized Justice. URL: https://blog.kleros.io/dispute-revolution-the-kleros-handbook-of-decentralizedjustice/ (accessed: 15.04.2019).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fischer-Lescano A., Teubner G. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law // Michigan Journal of International Law. — 2004. — Vol. 25.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fischer-Lescano A., Teubner G. Region-Collisions: The vault Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of  Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 25.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hardy I. T. The Proper Legal Regime for «Cyberspace» // University of Pittsburgh Law Abstract. — 1994. — Vol. 55.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hardy I.T. The Proper Legal Regime for «Cyberspace». University of Pittsburgh Law Abstract. 1994. Vol. 55.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson D., Post D. Law and Borders-The Rise of Law in Cyberspace // Stanford Law Abstract. — 1997. — Vol. 48.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson D., Post D. Law and Borders -The Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Abstract. 1997. Vol. 48.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mefford A. Lex Informatica: Foundations of Law on the Internet // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. — 1997. — Vol. 5. — Iss. 1. — Art. 11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meford A. Lex Informatica: Foundations of Law on the Internet. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 1997.  Vol. 5. Iss. 1. Art. 11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michaels R. The Re-State-Ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global Legal Pluralism // Wayne Law Abstract. — 2005. — Vol. 51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michaels R. The Re-State-Ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge from Global  Legal Pluralism. Wayne Law Abstract. 2005. Vol. 51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Polanski P. P. Towards a supranational Internet law // Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology. — 2006. — Vol. 1. — Iss. 1. — URL: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/28672-ENtowards-a-supranational-internet-law.pdf (дата обращения: 01.02.2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polanski P. P. Towards a supranational Internet law. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology.  2006. Vol. 1. Iss. 1. URL: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/28672-EN-towards-a-supranationalinternet-law.pdf (accessed: 01.02.2019).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raskin M. The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts // Georgetown Law Technology Abstract. — 2017. — Vol. 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raskin M. The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Abstract. 2017. Vol. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reidenberg J. R. Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Technology Rules Through Information Technology // Texas Law Abstract. — 1998. — Vol. 76. — No 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reidenberg J.R. Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Technology Rules Through Information  Technology. Texas Law Abstract. 1998. Vol. 76. No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rühl G. The Law Applicable to Smart Contracts, or Much Ado About Nothing? // URL: https://www.law.ox.ac. uk/business-law-blog/blog/2019/01/law-applicable-smart-contracts-or-much-ado-about-nothing (дата обращения: 07.04.2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rühl G. The Law Applicable to Smart Contracts, or Much Ado About Nothing? URL: https://www.law.ox.ac. uk/business-law-blog/blog/2019/01/law-applicable-smart-contracts-or-much-ado-about-nothing (accessed:  07.04.2019).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smits J. M. The Complexity of Transnational Law: Coherence and Fragmentation of Private Law // URL: https:// www.ejcl.org/143/art143-14.pdf (дата обращения: 15.09.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smits J.M. The Complexity of Transnational Law: Coherence and Fragmentation of Private Law. URL: https:// www.ejcl.org/143/art143-14.pdf (accessed: 15.09.2018).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Teubner G. Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in world society? // URL: https://www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/42852650/global_private_regimes.pdf (дата обращения: 22.01.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teubner G. Global private regions: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in  world society? URL: https://www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/42852650/global_private_regimes.pdf (accessed:  22.01.2018).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trakman L. E. From the Medieval Law Merchant to E-Merchant Law // The University of Toronto Law Journal. — 2003. — Vol. 53. — No. 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trakman L.E. From the Medieval Law Merchant to E-Merchant Law. The University of Toronto Law Journal.  2003. Vol. 53. No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trakman L. E. The Twenty-First Century Law Merchant // American Business Law Journal. — 2011. — Vol. 48. — No. 4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trakman L.E. The Twenty-First Century Law Merchant. American Business Law Journal. 2011. Vol. 48. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
