<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">lexrussica</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Lex russica</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Lex Russica</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1729-5920</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-7869</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MSAL</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/1729-5920.2019.155.10.084-103</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">lexrussica-970</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ПРАВО / JUS GENTIUM</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL LAW / JUS GENTIUM</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>«Судейская конвенция» как новый этап на пути признания и приведения в исполнение иностранных судебных решений</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>“Judicial Convention” as a New Stage in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Засемкова</surname><given-names>О. Ф.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zasemkova</surname><given-names>O. F.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Засемкова Олеся Федоровна, кандидат юридических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры международного частного права, старший преподаватель кафедры правового моделирования</p><p>125993, г. Москва, ул. Садовая-Кудринская, д. 9</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>ZASEMKOVA Olesya Fedorovna, Cand. Sci. (Law), Senior Lecturer of the Department of Private International Law, Senior Lecturer of the Moot Courts Department</p><p>125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">zasemkova.olesya@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>10</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>84</fpage><lpage>103</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Засемкова О.Ф., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Засемкова О.Ф.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zasemkova O.F.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/970">https://lexrussica.msal.ru/jour/article/view/970</self-uri><abstract><p>В мае 2018 г. на четвертом и заключительном заседании Специальной комиссии Гаагской конференции по международному частному праву был представлен проект Конвенции о признании и приведении в исполнение иностранных судебных решений по гражданским и торговым делам, работа над которым велась с 1992 г. Ожидается, что после проведения в середине 2019 г. Дипломатической сессии проект будет доработан, после чего Конвенция будет принята и открыта для подписания.</p><p>В связи с этим в статье предпринята попытка проанализировать основные положения проекта Конвенции и оценить целесообразность присоединения к ней Российской Федерации с учетом того, что у России практически отсутствуют международные договоры, позволяющие обеспечить признание и приведение в исполнение иностранных судебных решений в России и решений российских судов за рубежом. По итогам анализа автор приходит к выводу о том, что принятие данной Конвенции позволит создать простую и эффективную основу для признания и принудительного исполнения иностранных судебных решений, приемлемую для государств с различными правовыми, социальными и экономическими условиями. Это, в свою очередь, повысит практическое значение судебных решений, гарантируя наиболее полную защиту прав и интересов стороны, в пользу которой вынесено решение, и, как следствие, будет способствовать повышению привлекательности данного способа разрешения споров для сторон трансграничных частноправовых отношений.</p><p>Вместе с тем неоднозначное отношение к проекту со стороны ЕС и США ставит вопрос о возможности их присоединения к будущей Конвенции и может в значительной степени снизить эффект от принятия данного документа.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In May 2018, at the 4th and final meeting of the Special Commission of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, the draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters that had been developed since 1992 was represented. It is expected that after the Diplomatic Session that will be held in the mid-2019 the draft will be finalized and the Convention will be adopted and opened for signature.</p><p>In this regard, the article attempts to analyze the main provisions of the draft Convention and assess the appropriateness for the Russian Federation to access it, taking into account the fact that Russia has a limited number of international treaties permitting recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Russia and decisions of Russian courts abroad. Based on the results of the analysis, the author concludes that the adoption of this Convention will provide for a simple and effective basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments eligible for States with different legal, social and economic circumstances. This, in turn, will increase the practical value of court decisions ensuring the most comprehensive protection of the rights and interests of the party in whose favour the decision has been made and, as a consequence, will contribute to the attractiveness of this method of dispute resolution for parties involved in cross-border private law relations.</p><p>However, the mixed attitudes of the EU and the USA to the Draft Convention raises the question of their accession to the future Convention and may significantly reduce the impact of the adoption of the document under consideration.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>иностранные судебные решения</kwd><kwd>исполнение судебных решений</kwd><kwd>признание и исполнение</kwd><kwd>разрешение споров</kwd><kwd>международный гражданский процесс</kwd><kwd>Судейский проект</kwd><kwd>Гаагская конференция</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>foreign court decisions</kwd><kwd>enforcement of court decisions</kwd><kwd>recognition and enforcement</kwd><kwd>dispute resolution</kwd><kwd>international civil process</kwd><kwd>judicial project</kwd><kwd>Hague Conference</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена в развитие тезисов, изложенных на круглом столе «Проблемы признания и приведения в исполнение иностранных судебных и арбитражных решений» в Институте законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве РФ 14 ноября 2018 г.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The article has been drafted to develop the theses presented at the round table “Problems of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards” at the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation on November 14, 2018.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глобальный кодекс принудительного исполнения / пер. с англ. и коммент. А. А. Парфенчиковой. — М. : Статут, 2016. — 224 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Globalnyy kodeks prinuditelnogo ispolneniya [Global Code of Compulsory Enforcement]. Transl. from English and comment. by A. A. Parfenchikova. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2016. 224 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Давыденко Д. Л., Муранов А. И. Вопросы признания и (или) приведения в исполнение иностранных судебных решений в России // Корпоративный юрист. — 2007. — № 3. — С. 42—46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davydenko D. L., Muranov A. I. Voprosy priznaniya i (ili) privedeniya v ispolnenie inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy v Rossii [Issues of recognition and (or) enforcement of foreign court decisions in Russia]. Korporativnyy yurist [Corporate Lawyer]. 2007. No. 3. Pp. 42—46. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ерпылева Н. Ю. Международный гражданский процесс: институционно-нормативный механизм правового регулирования // Право и политика. — 2012. — № 9 (153). — С. 1485—1531.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Erpyleva N. Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy grazhdanskiy protsess: institutsionno-normativnyy mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya [International civil process: Institutional-normative mechanism of legal regulation]. Pravo i politika [Law and Politics]. 2012. no. 9 (153). Pр. 1485—1531. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ерпылева Н. Ю., Максимов Д. М. Признание и приведение в исполнение иностранных судебных решений: национальное и региональное измерение // Право. Журнал высшей школы экономики. — 2017. — № 2. — С. 200—222.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Erpyleva N. Yu., Maksimov D. M. Priznanie i privedenie v ispolnenie inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy: natsionalnoe i regionalnoe izmerenie [Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments: national and regional dimension]. Pravo. Zhurnal vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. 2017. No. 2. Pp. 200—222. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зайцев Р. В. Признание и приведение в исполнение в России иностранных судебных актов / под ред. В. В. Яркова. — М. : Волтер Клувер, 2007. — 192 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaitsev R. V. priznanie i privedenie v ispolnenie v rossii inostrannykh sudebnykh aktov [Recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial acts in Russia] V.V. Yarkov (ed.). Moscow, Walter Kluver, 2007. 192 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Засемкова О. Ф. Сверхимперативные нормы: теория и практика. — М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2018. — 412 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zasemkova O. F. Sverkhimperativnye normy: teoriya i praktika [Super-mandatory standards: theory and practice]. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ., 2018. 412 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Конев Д. В. Признание и приведение в исполнение иностранных судебных актов по гражданским и торговым делам в Германии и России: сравнительно-правовой анализ. — М. : Волтерс Клувер, 2010. — 262 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konev D. V. Priznanie i privedenie v ispolnenie inostrannykh sudebnykh aktov po grazhdanskim i torgovym delam v germanii i rossii: sravnitelno-pravovoy anali [Recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial acts in civil and commercial matters in Germany and Russia: comparative legal analysis]. Moscow, Walters Kluver, 2010. 262 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Костин А. А. Некоторые аспекты признания и приведения в исполнение иностранных судебных актов в арбитражном процессе РФ // Российский юридический журнал. — 2014. — № 3. — С. 151—159.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kostin A. A. Nekotorye aspekty priznaniya i privedeniya v ispolnenie inostrannykh sudebnykh aktov v arbitrazhnom protsesse RF [Some aspects of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the arbitration process of the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Juridical Journal]. 2014. No. 3. Pр. 151—159. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Костин А. А. Правовые основания признания и исполнения иностранных судебных решений в Российской Федерации : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. — М., 2018. — 266 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kostin A. A. Pravovye osnovaniya priznaniya i ispolneniya inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Legal grounds for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the Russian Federation: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow, 2018. 266 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куделич Е. А. Трансграничное исполнение судебных решений в России: в плену устоявшихся стереотипов или поступательное движение вперед? // Закон. — 2015. — № 5. — С. 143—157.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kudelich E. A. transgranichnoe ispolnenie sudebnykh resheniy v Rossii: v plenu ustoyavshikhsya stereotipov ili postupatelnoe dvizhenie vpered? [Cross-border enforcement of court decisions in Russia: in captivity of established stereotypes or progressive movement forward?]. Zakon [The Law]. 2015. No. 5. Pp. 143—157. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Литвинский Д. В. Признание иностранных судебных решений по гражданским делам (сравнительно-правовой анализ французского законодательства, судебной практики и юридической доктрины). — СПб. : Изд. дом С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2005. — 952 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Litvinskiy D. V. Priznanie inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy po grazhdanskim delam (sravnitelno-pravovoy analiz frantsuzskogo zakonodatelstva, sudebnoy praktiki i yuridicheskoy doktriny) [Recognition of foreign judgments in civil cases (comparative legal analysis of French legislation, judicial practice and legal doctrine)]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publishing House, 2005. 952 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Международное частное право : учебник / В. Н. Борисов, Н. В. Власова, Н. Г. Доронина [и др.] ; отв. ред. Н. И. Марышева. — 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. — М. : ИЗиСП, Контракт, 2018. — 848 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo : uchebnik [Private International Law: A textbook]. V. N. Borisov, N. C. Vlasova, N. G. Doronina [et al.]; N.I. Maryshev (ed.). 4 th  ed., revised and suppl., Moscow, ILCJ, Kontrakt Publ., 2018. 848 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хабриева Т. Я. Международное сотрудничество в области признания и исполнения иностранных судебных решений // Журнал российского права. — 2006. — № 8. — С. 4—6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khabrieva T. Ya.. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v oblasti priznaniya i ispolneniya inostrannykh sudebnykh resheniy [International cooperation in the field of recognition and execution of foreign judgments]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2006. No. 8. Pр. 4—6. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хлестова И. О. Конвенция ООН о юрисдикционных иммунитетах государств и их собственности и ее влияние на изменение цивилистического процесса в России // Закон. — 2012. — № 6. — С. 35—39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khlestova I. O. Konventsiya OON o yurisdiktsionnykh immunitetakh gosudarstv i ikh sobstvennosti i ee vliyanie na izmenenie tsivilisticheskogo protsessa v Rossii [UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property and Its Impact on the Change of the Civilistic Process in Russia]. Zakon [The Law]. 2012. No. 6. Pр. 35—39. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хлестова И. О. Юрисдикционный иммунитет государства. — М. : Юриспруденция, 2007. — 216 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khlestova I. O. Yurisdiktsionnyy immunitet gosudarstva [Jurisdictional immunity of the state]. Moscow, Yurisprudentsiya Publ., 2007. 216 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Щукин А. Гаагская конвенция в отношении соглашений о выборе суда 2005 г.: основные положения // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. — 2006. — № 5. — С. 41—48.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shchukin A. Gaagskaya konventsiya v otnoshenii soglasheniy o vybore suda 2005 g.: osnovnye polozheniya [Hague Choice of Court Convention 2005 : General provisions]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitration and Civil Process]. 2006. No. 5. Pр. 41—48. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burbank S. Federalism and Private International Law: Implementing the Hague Choice of Court Convention in the United States // Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series. — 2006. — Research Paper № 06- 27. — Pp. 1—26.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burbank S. Federalism and Private International Law: Implementing the Hague Choice of Court Convention in the United States. Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, 2006, Research Paper No. 06-27, pp. 1—26.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brand R. New Challenges in the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments // Legal Studies Research Paper Series. — 2018. — Working Paper № 2018-29. — Pp. 1—46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brand R. New Challenges in the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments. Legal Studies Research Paper Series. 2018. Working Paper No. 2018-29. Pp. 1—46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brand R. Transaction Planning Using Rules on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments. Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law. — The Hague : Brill-Nijhoff, 2014. — 360 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brand R. Transaction Planning Using Rules on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments. Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law. The Hague: Brill-Nijhoff, 2014. 360 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Calliess G.-P. Value-added Norms, Local Litigation, and Global Enforcement: Why the Brussels-Philosophy failed in the Hague // German Law Journal. — 2004. — Vol. 5. — № 12. — Pp. 1489—1498.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Calliess G.-P. Value-added Norms, Local Litigation, and Global Enforcement: Why the Brussels-Philosophy failed in the Hague. German Law Journal. 2004. Vol. 5. no. 12. Pp. 1489—1498.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fastiff E. The Proposed Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Commercial Judgments: A Solution to Butch Reynold`s Jurisdiction and Enforcement Problems // Cornell International Law Journal. — Spring 1995. — Vol. 28. — Iss. 2. — Pp. 469—499.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fastiff E. The Proposed Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Commercial Judgments: A Solution to Butch Reynold’s Jurisdiction and Enforcement Problems. Cornell International Law Journal. — Spring 1995. Vol. 28. Iss. 2. Pp. 469—499.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">George J. Enforcing Judgments Across State and National Boundaries: Inbound Foreign Judgments and Outbound Texas Judgments // South Texas Law Abstract. — 2009. — Vol. 50. — Pp. 399—447.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">George J. Enforcing Judgments Across State and National Boundaries: Inbound Foreign Judgments and Outbound Texas Judgments. South Texas Law Abstract. 2009. Vol. 50. Pp. 399—447.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mehren A. T. von Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements: A New Approach for the Hague Conference? // Law &amp; Contemporary Problems. — 1994. — Vol. 57. — Pp. 271—288.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mehren A. T. von Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements: A New Approach for the Hague Conference? Law &amp; Contemporary Problems. 1994. Vol. 57. Pp. 271—288.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pfund P. The Project of the Hague Conference on Private International Law to prepare a Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition / Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters // Brooklyn Journal of Private International Law. — 1998. — Vol. 24. — Iss. 1. — Pp. 7—15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pfund P. The Project of the Hague Conference on Private International Law to prepare a Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition/Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters. Brooklyn Journal of Private International Law. 1998. Vol. 24. Iss. 1. Pp. 7—15.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Regan J. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements — A Second Attempt in the Hague? // Richmond Journal of Global Law &amp; Business. — 2015. — Vol. 14:1. — Pp. 63—89.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Regan J. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments — A Second Attempt in the Hague? Richmond Journal of Global Law &amp; Business. 2015. Vol. 14:1. Pp. 63—89.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Svantesson D. The Hague conference`s «Judgments Project» 2.0 — how will it work in relation to e-commerce? // Internet Law Bulletin. — 2016. — Vol. 19 (2). — Pp. 270—273.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Svantesson D. The Hague Conference `s “Judgments Project” 2.0 — how will it work in relation to e-commerce? Internet Law Bulletin. 2016. Vol. 19 (2). Pp. 270—273.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trooboff P. Ten (and Probably More) Difficulties in Negotiating a Worldwide Convention on International Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments: Some Initial Lessons // A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from the Hague / J. Barcelo, K. Clermont (eds.). — The Hague, London, New York : Kluwer Law International, 2002. — 388 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trooboff P. Ten (and Probably More) Difficulties in Negotiating a Worldwide Convention on International Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments: Some Initial Lessons. A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from the Hague. J. Barcelo, K. Clermont (eds.). The Hague, London, New York: Kluwer Law International, 2002. 388 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
