ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND "PREDICTED JUSTICE": FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.156.11.079-087
Abstract
The paper deals with the problems of application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of justice. Present day environment facilitates the use of AI in law. Technology has entered the market. As a result, "predicted justice" has become possible. Once an overview of the possible future process is obtained, it is easier for the professional to complete the task-interpretation and final decision-making (negotiations, litigation). It will take a lot of work to bring AI up to this standard. Legal information should be structured to make it not only readable, but also effective for decision-making. "Predicted justice" can help both the parties to the case and the judges in structuring information, and students and teachers seeking relevant information. The development of information technology has led to increased opportunities for "predicted justice" programs. They take advantage of new digital tools. The focus is on two advantages of the programs: a) improving the quality of services provided; b) simultaneously monitoring the operational costs of the justice system. "Predicted justice" provides algorithms for analyzing a huge number of situations in a short time, allowing you to predict the outcome of a dispute or at least assess the chances of success. It helps: choose the right way of defense, the most suitable arguments, estimate the expected amount of compensation, etc. Thus, it is not about justice itself, but only about analytical tools that would make it possible to predict future decisions in disputes similar to those that have been analyzed.
About the Author
P. N. Biryukov
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of International and Eurasian Law
394018, Russia, Voronezh, ploshchad Lenina, d. 10A, korp. 9
References
1. Barr, A., & Feigenbaum, E.A. (1981). The Handbook of artificial intelligence. 1.
2. US Senate Joint Economic Committee. (n.d.). Chapter 9: Building a Secure Future, One blockchain at a time. Retrieved from: https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/aaac3a69-e9fb-45b6-be9f-b1fd96dd738b/chapter-9-building-a-secure-future-one-blockchain-at-a-time.pdf (accessed 24.04.2018).
3. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Artificial Intelligence for Europe. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/artificial-intelligence (accessed 24.04.2018).
4. Goodman, B., & Harder, J. (n.d.). Four areas of legal ripe for disruption by smart startups. ABA Journal. (12). Retrieved from https://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2014/12/smart-startups (accessed 24.04.2018).
5. Henry, P., & Hofstrossler, P. (2018, February 25). L’avenir de la profession d’avocats. Report.
6. Hutter, M. (2005). Universal Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer.
7. Jackson, P. (1985). Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Dover.
8. Kaplan A., & Haenlein, M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681318301393 24.04.2018).
9. Kaulartz, M. (2016, March 16). Von der zum Blockchain Smart Contract. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. P. 16.
10. Kaulartz, M., & Heckmann, J. (2016). Smart Contracts — the Blockchain der Anwendungen-Technologie. Computer und Recht. 32(9). DOI: 10.9785/cr-2016-0923.
11. Keppenne, R. (2016, May 23) Legal Tech and other smart contracts: what future for legal automation? ParisTech Abstract.
12. Legal Tech Market Map: 50 Startups Disrupting. Retrieved from https://www.cbinsights.com/research/legaltech-market-map-company-list 24.04.2018).
13. Luger, G., & Stubblefield, W. Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving. Benjamin/Cummings, 2004.
14. Neapolitan, R., & Jiang, X. (2018) Artificial Intelligence: With an Introduction to Machine Learning. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
15. Nilsson, N. (1998). Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann.
16. Predicting justice: what if algorithms entered the courthouse? (n.d.). Retrieved from http://theconversation. com/predicting-justice-what-if-algorithms-entered-the-courthouse-91692 (accessed 24.04.2018).
17. Predictive Justice — IA and the legal sector Colloquium organized by the Vlaamse Balie Brussels. (2018, October 17). Retrieved from http://www.legaltechcongres2018.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/C-Y-Poullet-Predictive-Justice—-IA-and-the-legal-sector.pdf (accessed 24.04.2018).
18. Queudot, M., & Meurs, M.-J. (2018, January). Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Justice: Limitations and Perspectives. Recent Trends and Future Technology in Applied Intelligence.
19. Reisenwitz, C. (2016, February 3). 5 legal tech entrepreneurs to watch. Capterra.
20. Russell, S.J., & Norvig, P. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Review
For citations:
Biryukov P.N. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND "PREDICTED JUSTICE": FOREIGN EXPERIENCE. Lex Russica. 2019;(11):79-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.156.11.079-087
Views:
1609
Email this article 