GROUNDS FOR ESTABLISHING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL JURISDICTION IN RELATION TO CROSS-BORDER CONSUMER DISPUTES IN DIGITAL ERA
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.156.11.096-107
Abstract
The paper examines the issues of establishing international judicial jurisdiction in relation to crossborder consumer disputes in the digital environment. To this end, the author makes a comparative analysis of the grounds for establishing judicial jurisdiction in the form of "distribution of advertising in the information and telecommunication network "Internet", aimed at attracting the attention of consumers" enshrined in art. 402 part 3 para. 2 of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, and the criterion of "directed activity of the professional party to the territory of the country of residence of the consumer", provided for in EU law.
The paper provides proposals for the interpretation of the grounds of jurisdiction of the Russian court, i.e. "advertising in the information and telecommunications network "Internet", aimed at attracting the attention of consumers in the territory of the Russian Federation", which should determine the use of protective judicial mechanisms in relation to the consumer from the use of an adverse judicial jurisdiction of a state, and against the employer, with the reasonable possibility of foreseeing the establishment of judicial jurisdiction of the consumer.
About the Author
L. V. TerentyevaRussian Federation
Cand. of Sci. (Law), Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of
International Private Law
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Abramova, E.N., Averchenko, N.N., & Grachev, V.V. [et al.]. (2016). Kommentariy k grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast tretya: uchebno-prakticheskiy kommentariy [Commentaries to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: Part three: tutorial review]. Edited by Prof., Doctor of Law A.P. Sergeev. Moscow: Prospect Publ.
2. Reznik, R.S. (2015). Mezhdunarodnaya podsudnost sporov iz dogovorov s uchastiem potrebitelya [International jurisdiction of disputes from contracts with the participation of the consumer]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Law. Journal of the Higher school of Economics]. (4). 165—173.
3. Savelyev, A.I. (2016). Elektronnaya kommertsiya v Rossii i za rubezhom: pravovoe regulirovanie [E-Commerce in Russia and abroad: legal regulation]. Moscow: Statut Publ.
4. Beek, M., D’Aubrey, M., & Garzaniti, J. (n.d.). Consumer disputes in a cross border e-commerce context. Retrieved from http://www.ejtn.eu/PageFiles/14777/Written%20paper_Belgium.pdf (accessed: 11.09.2019).
5. Gillies, L.E. (2008). Electronic commerce and International Private Law. Ashgate, UK.
6. Farah, Y. (2008). Allocation of jurisdiction and the internet in EU law. European Law Abstract. 2008. 33. 257—270.
7. Lazic, V. (2014). Procedural Justice for «Weaker Parties» in Cross-Border Litigation under the EU Regulatory Scheme. Utrecht Law Abstract. 10 (4). 100—117.
8. Tang, Z.S. (2014). Consumer contracts and the Internet in EU private international law. Research Handbook on EU Internet Law. A. Savin, J. Trzaskowski (ed). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 254—284.
Review
For citations:
Terentyeva L.V. GROUNDS FOR ESTABLISHING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL JURISDICTION IN RELATION TO CROSS-BORDER CONSUMER DISPUTES IN DIGITAL ERA. Lex Russica. 2019;(11):96-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.156.11.096-107