Digitalization of the Initial Stage of Criminal Proceedings as a Necessary Means of Ensuring the Rights of Victims

The paper deals with the problems related to the protection and enforcement of the rights of the victim during acceptance, registration and examination of reports of crimes at the initial stage of criminal proceedings. The author substantiates the necessity of improving the practice of initiation of criminal proceedings, the judicial data for the purpose of precise implementation of Art. 52 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as well as proposals on digitalization at this stage of criminal proceedings. The author emphasizes that criminal proceedings should be considered as a uniform state power activity, beginning with a report on the committed crime and ending with the final resolution of all substantive and procedural issues arising in the case. In view of this, the process of digitalization of criminal proceedings should be based on a single platform linking not only all stages of the proceedings, but also officials of any of the departments carrying out certain phases of this activity. Such a platform should comply with the statutory framework, be accessible to all participants in the process whose rights and interests are affected by the activity under consideration. The platform should represent a flexible digital system that secures the secret of production with regard to some parameters, including investigatory privilege, protection of the honor and dignity of a person, his or her right to privacy, family and other secrets protected by law. But according to other parameters it should be accessible for the person involved in this proceeding, his advocate and representative. In addition, according to certain parameters complying with the law, this platform should also be accessible for other persons to conduct research and to summarize the practice of criminal proceedings in the past; for the media providing the public with access to information about the proceedings in certain cases or in the public debate on certain legal issues, and it should be available to enforce protection of human rights in the field of criminal proceedings, etc.

1. Antonyan EA, Aminov II. Blokcheyn-tekhnologii v protivodeystvii kiberterrorizmu [Blockchain Technologies in Countering Cyberterrorism]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019;6. (In Russ.)

2. Atakishi AM. Vliyanie tsifrovizatsii na realizatsiyu printsipa sostyazatelnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve otdelnykh gosudarstv [The Influence of Digitalization on the Implementation of the Principle of Competitiveness in Criminal Proceedings of Certain States]. In: The Russian Legal System in the Conditions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution : Proceedings of the VI Moscow Legal Forum. Part 3. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

3. Bormotova LV. Osobennosti informatsionno-kommunikativnogo obespecheniya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Peculiarities of information and communicative support of criminal proceedings]. Vestnik of OSU. 2013;3:24— 27. (In Russ.)

4. Bykov VM. Problemy stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Problems of the Stage of Initiation of Criminal Proceedings]. Journal of Russian Law. 2006;7:53—67. (In Russ.)

5. Vilkova TYu. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitelnyy analiz [Pre-Trial Proceedings under the Conditions of Development of Digital Technologies in Russia and Abroad: A Comparative Analysis]. In: The Russian Legal System in the Conditions of the 4th Industrial Revolution: Proceedings of the 6th Moscow Legal Forum]. Part 3. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

6. Vitsin SE. Institut vozbuzhdeniya dela v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [A Institution of Initiation of Proceedings in Criminal Proceedings]. Russian Justitia. 2003;6. (In Russ.)

7. Volodina LM. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo i mekhanizm dostupa k pravosudiyu [Pre-trial Proceedings and Access to Justice Mechanisms]. In: The Russian Legal System in the Conditions of the 4th Industrial Revolution: Proceedings of the 6th Moscow Legal Forum]. Part 3. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

8. Volodina LM. Problemy reglamentatsii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Problems of regulation of initiation of criminal case]. Library of a Criminalist. Academic Journal. 2013;4. (In Russ.)

9. Voskobitova LA. Vozbuzhdenie i prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela, analiz sledstvennoy praktiki [Initiation and Termination of a Criminal Case, an Analysis of Investigatory Practice]. Criminal Judicial Proceeding. 2010;2. (In Russ.)

10. Voskobitova LA. Funktsionalnaya model ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [A functional model of criminal proceedings]. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2018;32(42). (In Russ.)

11. Gavrilov BYa. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo v XXI veke: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya [Pre-trial Proceedings in the 21st Century: Current State and Prospects of Improvement]. In: The Russian Legal System in the Conditions of the 4th Industrial Revolution: Proceedings of the 6th Moscow Legal Forum]. Part 3. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

12. Gavrilov BYa. Realii i mify vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Realities and myths of initiation of criminal proceedings]. Criminal Judicial Proceeding. 2010;2. (In Russ.)

13. Gavrilov BYa. Sovremennyy ugolovno-protsessualnyy zakon i realii ego pravoprimeneniya [Modern Criminal Procedure Law and the Realities of its Enforcement]. Russian Investigator. 2010;4. (In Russ.)

14. Govorkov N.Dokazyvanie polucheniya vzyatki [Proving of Receiving a Bribe]. Zakonnost. 2008;8. (In Russ.)

15. Derishev YuV. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela — relikt «sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti» [The Stage of Initiation of Criminal Proceedings — a Relic of “Socialist Legality”]. Russian Justitia. 2003;8. (In Russ.)

16. Karnozova LM. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo. Opyt paradigmalnogo analiza [Criminal Justice and a Sivil Society. Experience of Paradigmatic Analysis]. Moscow: Valent; 2010. (In Russ.)

17. Luneev VV. Mirovye, regionalnye i rossiyskie tendentsii [Crime of the 20th Century. World, Regional and Russian Tendencies]. Moscow: Norma; 1997. (In Russ.)

18. Maslennikova LN.. Transformatsiya dosudebnogo proizvodstva v nachalnyy etap ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, obespechivayushchiy dostup k pravosudiyu v eru industry 4.0 [Transformation of Pre-Trial Proceedings into the Initial Stage of Criminal Proceedings Providing Access to Justice in the Era of Industry 4.0]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019;6. (In Russ.)

19. Maslennikova LN, Sobenin AA. Registratsiya soobshcheniya o prestuplenii i nachalo rassledovaniya v novoy tsifrovoy realnosti [Registration of the report on the crime and the beginning of the investigation in the new digital reality]. Russian Investigator. 2019;6. (In Russ.)

20. Naumov AV. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo : kurs lektsiy [Russian Criminal Law: A Course of Lectures]. 5th ed. Vol. 1. Moscow: Volters Kluver; 2011. (In Russ.)

21. Obidin KV. O sootnoshenii osnovaniy dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela i osnovaniy dlya predyavleniya obvineniya v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [The Ratio of Grounds for Initiation of Criminal Proceedings and Grounds for Bringing Charges in the Conditions of Digitalization of Criminal Proceedings]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019;6. (In Russ.)

22. Obidin KV. Osobennosti predmeta dokazyvaniya po delam o vzyatochnichestve [Features of the Subject of Proof in Cases of Bribery]. Criminal Judicial Proceeding. 2017;4. (In Russ.)

23. Okonenko RI. Dokazatelstvennoe pravo rossiyskoy federatsii i soedinennykh shtatov ameriki v informatsionnuyu epokhu: ugolovno-protsessualnyy aspekt [Evidence Law of the Russian Federation and the United States of America in the Information Age: a Criminal Procedural Aspect]. Juridical Journal of Samara University. 2015;1(3). (In Russ.)

24. Paneyakh E, Titayev K, Shklyaruk M. Traektoriya ugolovnogo dela: institutsionalnyy analiz [Trajectory of a Criminal Case: An Institutional Analysis]. St. Petersburg: European University Publishing House; 2018. (In Russ.)

25. Popov IA. Dokazyvanie predmeta vzyatki kak neobkhodimoe uslovie privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [Proving the Subject Matter of a Bribe as a Necessary Condition for Criminal Prosecution]. Magistrate Judge. 2018;3. (In Russ.)

26. Sobenin AA. K voprosu o protsessualnoy forme dosudebnogo proizvodstva v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy [On the Procedural Form of Pre-Trial Proceedings in the Conditions of Development of Digital Technologies]. In: The Russian Legal System in the Conditions of the 4th Industrial Revolution: Proceedings of the 6th Moscow Legal Forum]. Part 3. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

27. Tabolina KA. K voprosu o vysokotekhnologichnom nadzore prokurora v ugolovnom protsesse [High Tech Supervision of the Prosecutor in Criminal Proceedings]. In: The Russian Legal System in the Conditions of the 4th Industrial Revolution: Proceedings of the 6th Moscow Legal Forum]. Part 3. Moscow: Prospekt; 2019. (In Russ.)

28. Yani PS. Dostatochnost dokazatelstv po delam o vzyatochnichestve [Sufficiency of Evidence in Cases of Bribery]. Zakonnost. 2018;9 . (In Russ.)