Critical Concepts of the State and their Significance for Russian Jurisprudence: Introduction to the Problem

The state is for the most part a key political concept in the minds of lawyers. It is often "devoid" of history: they use the same term to name ancient and modern political associations (Polis, Republic, Empire, national state), without noticing the fundamental difference between them. The paper emphasizes the difference between "universalist" and "critical" approaches to the state. The former seeks to see the birth of the state in the second Millennium BC, trying to link the emergence of law with the emergence of the state. The latter emphasizes the historical contextuality of the emergence of the state — a unique social institution that appeared in Europe during the early Modern period. The state is a modern (modern) social construct, and its reality is determined not only by the presence of a certain idea in the minds of people, but also by stable, typified social practices. In the modern world, law is mediated by the state, and in many cases, it is monopolized by it. In this perspective, the history of the state is often inseparable from the history of law, and the theory of law from the theory of the state. The author of the paper adheres to the second approach and agrees that law is a phenomenon whose existence has not been determined by the state for a long time.
The author presumes that for many reasons, the state continues to be a priori political category in the minds of lawyers who observe daily manifestations of power mechanisms. To denounce this "naturalness" of the state, critical approaches to the concept and origin of the state are necessary. The paper presents various critical concepts of the state: from radical political evolutionism to critical conceptual history.

1. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined community. Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism]. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.)

2. Bourdieu P. O gosudarstve [On the state]. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.)

3. Hobbes T. Leviafan, ili materiya, forma i vlast gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil]. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.)

4. Grunebaum GE von. Klassicheskiy islam. Ocherk istorii (600—1258) [Classic Islam. A history 600-1258]. Moscow; 1988. (In Russ.)

5. David R. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti [The main legal systems of our time]. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.)

6. Jessop B. Gosudarstvo: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee [The State:Past, Present, Future]. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.)

7. Jellinek G. Obshchee uchenie o gosudarstve [General Theory of the State]. Saint Petersburg; 2004. (In Russ.)

8. Jouvenel B. de. Vlast. Estestvennaya istoriya ee vozrastaniya [On Power: The Natural History of its Growth]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.)

9. Zorkin VD. Pozitivistskaya teoriya prava v Rossii [Positivist theory of law in Russia]. Moscow; 1978. (In Russ.)

10. Ivanova YuV, Sokolov PV. Krome Makiavelli: problema metoda v politicheskikh naukakh rannego novogo vremeni [In addition to Machiavelli: The Problem of method in political Sciences in early modern times]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)

11. Kant I.Kritika prakticheskogo razuma [The Critique of Practical Reason] In: Kant I. Metafizika nravov, v dvukh chastyakh [The Metaphysics of Morals, in two parts]. Saint Petersburg; 2007. (In Russ.)

12. Carneiro R. Teoriya proiskhozhdeniya gosudarstva [Theory of the origin of the state]. Rannee gosudarstvo, ego alternativy i analogi [The early state, its alternatives and analogues]. Volgograd; 2006. (In Russ.)

13. Karsavin LP. Gosudarstvo i krizis demokratii [The state and the crisis of democracy]. Noviy mir [A new world]. 1991;1. (In Russ.)

14. Kiselev MA. Pravda i zakon vo vtoroy polovine XVII-pervoy chetverti XVIII veka: ot monarkha-sudi k monarkhuzakonodatelyu [Truth and the law in the second half of the 17th-first quarter of the 18thcentury: from the monarch-judge to the monarch-legislator]. In: «Ponyatiya o Rossii»: k istoricheskoy semantike imperskogo perioda [«Concepts of Russia»: to the historical semantics of the Imperial period]. Moscow; 2012. Vol. 1. (In Russ.)

15. Kopylova E. Mezhdunarodnyy ugolovnyy sud i palestinskaya avtonomiya: otkaz v pravosudii [The international criminal court and the Palestinian authority: denial of justice]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International justice]. 2012;2(3). (In Russ.)

16. Cotterrell R. Erlikh na okraine imperii: tsentry i periferii v pravovykh issledovaniyakh [Ehrlich at the Edge of Empire: Centers and Peripheries in Legal Studies]. In: Erlikh O. Osnovopolozhenie sotsiologii prava [The Sociology of Law: An Introduction]. Saint Petersburg; 2011. (In Russ.)

17. Krom M. Rozhdenie gosudarstva: Moskovskaya Rus XV-XVI vekov [Birth of the State: Moscow Rus of the 15-16th Centuries]. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.)

18. Krom M. Rozhdenie gosudarstva novogo vremeni v Rossii i Zapadnoy Evrope: sravnitelno-istoricheskaya perspektiva [The Birth of the Modern State in Russia and Western Europe: A Comparative Historical Perspective]. In: Trudy kafedry istorii Rossii s drevneyshikh vremen do XX veka [Proceedings of the Department of Russian History from ancient times to the 20th century]. Saint Petersburg; 2006. (In Russ.)

19. Mamut LS. Gosudarstvo kak publichnovlastnym obrazom organizovannyy narod [The state as a publicly organized people]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2000;3. (In Russ.)

20. Mamut LS. Sotsialnoe gosudarstvo s tochki zreniya prava [The social state from the point of view of law]. Gosudarstvo i Pravo [State and Law]. 2001;7. (In Russ.)

21. Sieyes EZh. Chto takoe trete soslovie [What is the Third Estate?]. In: Abbat Siyes: ot Burbonov k Bonapartu [L’abbe Sieyes: From the Bourbons to Bonaparte]. Saint Petersburg; 2003. (In Russ.)

22. Tocqueville A. de. Staryy poryadok i revolyutsiya [The Old Regime and the Revolution]. Moscow, Chelyabinsk; 2016. (In Russ.)

23. Fenomen polisa v sovremennoy zarubezhnoy istoriografii [The phenomenon of the Polis in modern foreign historiography]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.)

24. Kharkhordin O. Osnovnye ponyatiya rossiyskoy politiki [Basic concepts of Russian politics]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.)

25. Chistoe uchenie o prave Gansa Kelzena: sb. perevodov [Pure doctrine of law by Hans Kelsen: collection of translations]. Issue 2. Moscow; 1988. (In Russ.)

26. Shakhmatov MV. Podvig vlasti: opyt po istorii gosudarstvennykh idealov Rossii [Grest deed of power: experience in the history of Russian state ideals]. In: Shakhmatov MV. Gosudarstvo pravdy [State of truth]. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)

27. Schmitt K. Gosudarstvo kak konkretnoe ponyatie, svyazannoe s opredelennoy istoricheskoy epokhoy [The state as a concrete concept associated with a certain historical epoch]. Logos. 2012;5(89). (In Russ.)

28. Stark R. Res Publica. In: Res Publica: istoriya ponyatiya [Res Publica: History of the concept]. Saint Petersburg; 2009. (In Russ.)

29. Engels F. Proiskhozhdenie semi, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva [The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State]. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.)

30. Hobsbawm E. Introduction: The Invention of Tradition. In: Hobsbawm E, Ranger T. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge; 1983. (In Eng.)

31. Kennedy D. Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy. New York, 1983. (In Eng.)