Criteria for Selecting Members of Municipal Public Chambers and Councils in Russia and Economic, Social and Environmental Councils in France

he paper considers the goals implemented in the legal regulation of the formation of public chambers (councils) inArkhangelsk, Barnaul, Volgograd, Yekaterinburg, Surgut (Russia) and social, economic and environmental councils of the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, Hauts-de-France, New Aquitaine, Brittany, Normandy regions (France). It is suggested that the main possible goals are to ensure that citizens represent their interests and the city authorities receive assistance from citizens when solving their tasks. 
There is a similarity between the requirements for candidates for membership in Russian public chambers and French social, economic and environmental councils (the need for representation of those whose lives depend on the level of development of the territorial unit in which the Advisory body operates; the ban on membership for those having been involved in offenses; the need for representation of public organizations). The requirements, both identical and different, are primarily aimed at ensuring the representation of the local population. At the same time, the French legislature sets a requirement for mandatory representation not of any local resident, but of particular groups defined for various reasons and a certain numerical ratio of representatives of these groups. As for the formation procedure, the composition of the considered Russian Advisory bodies is determined by local self-government bodies, while the French ones are determined by state authorities, besides local organizations are involved both in Russia and France. This procedure (as well as part of the requirements for candidates) is aimed at selecting individuals who are qualified enough to help local governments in the implementation of their functions, in case there are guarantees that these individuals will be representatives of the local community. At the same time, it is stipulated that elections are not the only way to ensure the representation of citizens; alternative methods include, in particular, the division of members of the Advisory body into groups based on the categories of the population they represent, provided for in the French law. 

1. Barabashev GV, Starovoytov NG, Sheremet KF. Sovety narodnykh deputatov na etape sovershenstvovaniya sotsializma [Soviets of people’s deputies at the stage of improving socialism]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1987. (In Russ.)

2. Bondareva EA. Obshchestvennaya palata Rossiyskoy Federatsii — institut ili «ministerstvo» grazhdanskogo obshchestva? [Public chamber of the Russian Federation — Institute or "Ministry" of civil society?]. Vestnik voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Proceedings of Voronezh State University Series: Law]. 2006;1:26-38. (In Russ.)

3. Borovkov PS. Ot kooptatsii k vyboram: reformirovanie sposoba izbraniya pontifikov v rimskoy respublike v III-II vv. do n.e. (politiko-pravovoy aspekt) [From co-optation to elections: reforming the method of electing pontiffs in the Roman Republic in the 3-2 centuries BC (political and legal aspect)]. Vestnik drevney istorii. 2011;2(277):109-122. (In Russ.)

4. Kukushkin MI, et al. Vybory v mekhanizme narodovlastiya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Elections in the mechanism of democracy in the Russian Federation]. Ekaterinburg; 2000. (In Russ.)

5. Grib VV. Modeli i printsipy formirovaniya obshchestvennykh palat v subektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Models and principles of formation of public chambers in the subjects of the Russian Federation]. URL: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/47518-modeli-principy-formirovaniya-obshhestvennykh-palat-subektakh-rossijskoj [cited 2019 Nov 09]. (In Russ.)

6. Kolomyttseva ON, Kolomyttseva LN. Deyatelnost obshchestvennoy palaty RF po ogranicheniyu gosudarstvennoy vlasti [Activities of the Public chamber of the Russian Federation to restrict state power]. Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta [Bulletin of the Vladimir Law Institute]. 2008;3(8):148-151. (In Russ.)

7. Ogneva EA. Obshchestvennaya palata kak pravozashchitnyy institut v sisteme obshchestvennogo kontrolya sovremennoy Rossii [Public chamber as a human rights institution in the system of public control in modern Russia]. Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk [Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences]. 2014;1(31):146-151. (In Russ.)

8. Panov AA. Obshchestvennaya palata Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak novyy subekt grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Public chamber of the Russian Federation as a new subject of civil society]. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2005;6:22-30. (In Russ.)

9. Popov AA. Programma vzaimodeystviya obshchestvennykh organizatsiy v sfere povysheniya effektivnosti i razvitii organov mestnogo samoupravleniya [Program of interaction of public organizations in the field of improving the efficiency and development of local government]. Sotsiologiya i pravo [Sociology and law]. 2013;3(20):19-23. (In Russ.)

10. Tikhovodova AV. Evolyutsiya obshchestvennoy palaty RF kak instituta grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Evolution of the Public chamber of the Russian Federation as an institution of civil society]. Vestnik Volzhskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii vodnogo transporta. 2013;35:138-144. (In Russ.)

11. Fesechko TA, Ivliev PV. Optimizatsiya roli Obshchestvennoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse [Optimization of the role of the Public chamber of the Russian Federation in the legislative process]. Yuridicheskaya mysl [Legal thought]. 2008;6(50):137-142. (In Russ.)

12. Bacqué M-H, Gauthier M. Participation, urbanisme et études urbaines. Quatre décennies de débats et d’expériences depuis "a ladder of citizen participation" de S. R. Arnstein. URL: https://www.cairn.inforevueparticipations-2011-1-page-36.htm [cited 2019 Dec 28]. (In Fr.)

13. Bherer L. Les relations ambiguës entre participation et politiques publiques. URL: https://www.cairn.inforevue-participations-2011-1-page-105.htm [cited 2019 Oct 25]. (In Fr.)

14. Blondiaux L, Fourniau J-M. Un bilan des recherches sur la participation du public en démocratie: beaucoup de bruit pour rien? URL: https://www.cairn.inforevue-participations-2011-1-page-8.htm [cited 2019 Oct 25]. (In Fr.)

15. Nez H. Nature et légitimités des savoirs citoyens dans l’urbanisme participatif. Une enquête ethnographique à Paris, 2011. URL: https://www.cairn.info/revue-sociologie-2011-4-page-387.htm [cited 2019 Dec 28]. (In Fr.)