Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

A Promising Model of the “Symmetrical Federation” State System in the Context of Ensuring National Security of Russia

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.166.9.039-048

Abstract

The problem of ensuring national security is so important for the Russian Federation that, along with the rule of human rights and freedoms, as well as patriotism, it can become an ideological pillar. The asymmetry of the state system of Russia poses one of the treats to the state security. It invariably affects the vector and pace of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, creates conditions for decentralization and, in the long term, could lead to more serious political consequences. A potential for improvement of the state system lies in strengthening of the institution of plenipotentiary representatives of the President of Russia in the federal districts, as well as in considering the further enlargement of certain constituent entities of the Federation. The fact is that the existing model of the state system that evolved as a result of the Russian Federation succession to the USSR does not any longer comply with the national interest creating a gap in the field of ensuring state security.
The existance of the constituent entities that are heterogeneous in territory, population size and composition, economic potential, and the most importantly — the actual amount of political rights granted to ethnos -- inevitably raises the question of the illusory of the equality of peoples settled in the republics, autonomous districts and regions, with other indigenous and non-indigenous small peoples, as well as with the Russians. Such differentiation forms the dynamics of latent migration processes, as well as complicates the criminogenic situation due to “ethnic crime”, including corruption-related crimes, creating problems for the State in the field of law enforcement. This kind of metamorphoses, which require constitutional changes, forces the domestic legal science to develop a perspective model of the state structure of Russia. Discussions on this issue are valuable in themselves, as they allow us to formulate possible directions for the development of the state and law with due regard to the historical destiny and international mission of our State, especially in light of the 75th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War. The considerations stated above mainstream this paper.

About the Authors

E. I. Foigel
Baikal State University
Russian Federation

Elena I. Foigel, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Criminalistics, Forensic Examination and Legal Psychology 

ul. Lenina, d. 11, Irkutsk, 664003



G. G. Nebratenko
South Russian Institute of Management, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Gennadiy G. Nebratenko, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Theory and History of the State and Law

ul. Pushkinskaya, d. 70, Rostov-on-Don, 344002



I. G. Smirnova
Institute of the State and Law, Baikal State University
Russian Federation

Irina G. Smirnova, Dr. Sci. (law), Head of the Department of Criminal Law, Criminology and Criminal Procedure

ul. Lenina, d. 11, Irkutsk, 664003



References

1. Zhuravleva GP, editor. XXI vek : Novaya realnost sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya mira i Rossii [21st century: The New Reality of Socio-Economic Development of the World and Russia]. Moscow: Plekhanov University Press; 2018. (In Russ.)

2. Atanov AA. Dannost, deystvitelnost, ekspertnaya otsenka v sisteme metodologii gumanitarnykh nauk [Data, validity, expert assessment in the system of methodology of humanities]. Bulletin of Baikal State University. 2019;29(3):359—371. DOI: 10.17150/2500-2759.2019.29 (3).359-371. (In Russ.)

3. Kirienko GS. Ukrupnenie subektov rossiyskoy federatsii: sovremennyy vzglyad na staruyu reformu [Enlargement of subjects of the Russian Federation: a modern view of the old reform]. State Power and Local Self-Government. 2015;9:30-34. (In Russ.)

4. Litvintseva NYu. Konstitutsionnyy mekhanizm realizatsii prav lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Constitutional mechanism of realization of the rights of the individual in criminal proceedings]. Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings. 2019;2:31—32. (In Russ.)

5. Umnova IA. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sovremennogo rossiyskogo federalizma [Constitutional Fundamentals of Modern Russian Federalism]. Moscow: Delo Publ.; 1998. (In Russ.)

6. Shalak AV. K otsenke sotsialnogo polozheniya naseleniya vostochnoy sibiri (1940-e gody) [To the assessment of the social situation of the population of Eastern Siberia (1940s)]. Journal of Economic History and History of Economics. 2000;7:66—74. (In Russ.)

7. Shuplitsov AF, Latysheva MA. Mekhanizm effektivnogo osvoeniya territoriy Zabaykalskogo kraya [Mechanism of Effective Development of Areas of Transbaikal Krai]. Bulletin of Baikal State University. 2019;29(2):332—341. DOI: 10.17150/2500-2759.2019.29 (2).332-341. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Foigel E.I., Nebratenko G.G., Smirnova I.G. A Promising Model of the “Symmetrical Federation” State System in the Context of Ensuring National Security of Russia. Lex Russica. 2020;73(9):39-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.166.9.039-048

Views: 943


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)