Reflections on the Essence of Proof in Criminal Proceedings

In this paper, the author continues the cycle of his scientific publications devoted to the problems of theory, legislative regulation and practice of cognition and proving of circumstances that are relevant to a criminal case.

The paper investigates and analyzes two of the most common scientific approaches to the essence of criminal procedural evidence: a) a narrow approch, i.e. identifying proving with a specific type of cognitive activity of a person; b) a broad approach, i.e. involving inclusion in the content of proving cognitive (cognitive-verifying) techniques and various argumentative and logical operations carried out by the interrogator, investigator, as well as the accused, the defence counsel, the victim and other participants in criminal proceedings.

Methodologically relying on the results of many years of research conducted at the intersection of philosophy and psychology, psychophysiology and neuropsychology, the author comes to a conclusion about the feasibility of using a broad approach to the essence of criminal procedural evidence that reflect the continuity of this enforcement activity in relation to the general laws of gnoseology and formal logic. According to the author, the use of this approach allows to maximize harmonization of criminal procedural theory with the real life needs of investigative and judicial practices.

At the same time, the paper concludes that many scientific disputes and disagreements about the essence and content of criminal procedural evidence are to some extent factitious and derived from a lack of uniformity in the terminology used. However, the author believes that in modern conditions it is almost impossible to reach any consensus in this part of the development of criminal procedural science. Thus, this circumstance should be perceived as an objectively existing theoretical reality.

1. Astafyev YuV, Izotova NV. Dokazyvanie i operativno-rozysknaya deyatelnost: problemy sootnosheniya i vzaimodeystviya [Proving and operational search activity: problems of correlation and interaction]. Kursk: FGUIPP Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.)

2. Belkin RS Lleninskaya teoriya otrazheniya i metodologicheskie problemy sovetskoy kriminalistiki [Lenin theory of reflection and methodological problems of Soviet forensics]. Moscow: Higher School of Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR Press; 1970. (In Russ.)

3. Bozhev VP. Osnovnye voprosy sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa : ucheb. posobie [Main issues of the Soviet criminal process: study. manual]. Moscow: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR Press; 1978. (In Russ.)

4. Volodina LM. Problemy ugolovnogo protsessa: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Problems of criminal process: law, theory, practice]. Moscow: Yurist Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.)

5. Zaporozhets AV, editor. Vospriyatie i deystvie [Perception and action]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ.; 1967. (In Russ.)

6. Gorskiy GF, Kokorev LD, Elkind PS. Problemy dokazatelstv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Problems of Evidence in the Soviet Criminal Procedure]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ.; 1978. (In Russ.)

7. Davletov AA. Osnovy ugolovno-protsessualnogo poznaniya [Fundamentals of Criminal Procedure Cognition]. 2nd ed. Yekaterinburg: Humanities University Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.)

8. Deineko NI. Obektivnoe i subektivnoe v protsesse otrazheniya (filosofskiy aspekt) [The Objective and Subjective in the process of reflection (philosophical aspect)]. Kiev — Odessa: Vyshcha Shkola Publ.; 1978. (In Russ.)

9. Aleksandrov GF, editor. Dialekticheskiy materializm [Dialectical materialism]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ.; 1954. (In Russ.)

10. Zazhitskiy VI. Dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie po UPK RF [Evidence and proof under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation]. St. Petersburg: Legal Center-Press Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.)

11. Kaz TsM. Dokazatelstva v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Evidence in the Soviet criminal proceedings]. Saratov: Saratov State University Publ.; 1960. (In Russ.)

12. Karneeva LM. Dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie pri proizvodstve rassledovaniya [Evidence and proof during the investigation]. Gorkiy: GVSh of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR Publ.; 1977. (In Russ.)

13. Karyakin EA. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy formirovaniya istiny po ugolovnomu delu v sude pervoy instantsii [Theoretical and practical problems of formation of truth in criminal case in court of first instance]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.)

14. Kassirer E. Poznanie i deystvitelnost [Cognition and validity]. St. Petersburg: Shipovnik Publ.; 1912. (In Russ.)

15. Kokorev LD, Kuznetsov NP. Ugolovnyy protsess: dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie [Criminal Procedure: Evidence and Proving]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University publ.; 1995. (In Russ.)

16. Kopnin PV. Gnoseologicheskie i logicheskie osnovy nauki [Gnoseological and logical foundations of science]. Moscow: Mysl Publ.; 1974. (In Russ.)

17. Kopyeva AN. Dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam v vyshestoyashchem sude [Proof in criminal cases in a higher court]. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University publ.; 1990. (In Russ.)

18. Kostenko RV. Dokazatelstva v ugolovnom protsesse: kontseptualnye podkhody i perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya : dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Evidence in criminal proceedings: conceptual approaches and prospects of legal regulation: Dr. Sci. (Law) Dissertation]. Krasnodar: KubGAU Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.)

19. Kurylev SV. Osnovy teorii dokazyvaniya v sovetskom pravosudii [Fundamentals of the theory of proof in Soviet justice]. Minsk: Lenin BSU Publ.; 1969. (In Russ.)

20. Livshits V. Ya. Printsip neposredstvennosti v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [The principle of immediacy in the Soviet criminal process]. Moscow-Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ.; 1949. (In Russ.)

21. Luzgin IM. metodologicheskie problemy rassledovaniya [Methodological problems of investigation]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1973. (In Russ.)

22. Lupinskaya PA. Dokazyvanie v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse : ucheb. posobie [Proving in the Soviet criminal process: study. manual]. Moscow: VYuZI publ.; 1966. (In Russ.)

23. Lupinskaya PA. resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoriya, zakonodatelstvo, praktika [Decisions in criminal proceedings: theory, legislation, practice]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.)

24. Maklakov AG. Obshchaya psikhologiya [General Psychology]. St. Petersburg; Peter Publ.; 2001. (In Russ.)

25. Naisser U. Poznanie i realnost. Smysl i printsipy kognitivnoy psikhologii [Cognition and reality. Meaning and Principles of Cognitive Psychology]. Moscow: Progress Publ.; 1981. (In Russ.)

26. Petukhovskiy AA. Problemy dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom protsesse (sovershenstvovanie zakonodatelstva i pravoprimenitelnoy praktiki) [Problems of proof in criminal proceedings (improvement of legislation and law enforcement practice)]. Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.)

27. Popper KP. Obektivnoe znanie. Evolyutsionnyy podkhod [Objective knowledge. Evolutionary Approach]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.)

28. Rakhunov RD. Uchastniki ugolovno-protsessualnoy deyatelnosti [Participants of criminal procedure]. Moscow: Gosurizdat Publ.; 1961. (In Russ.)

29. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy. ocherki o germenevtike [Conflict interpretations. Essays on hermeneutics]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ.; 2008. (In Russ.)

30. Rossinskiy BV, Rossinskiy S. B. Rezultaty administrativnoy deyatelnosti kak dokazatelstva po ugolovnomu delu [Results of administrative activity as evidence in criminal case]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law. 2018;9(3):310—329. (In Russ.)

31. Rossinskiy SB. K voprosu o razvitii teorii dokazatelstv v ugolovnom protsesse [On the question of the development of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings]. Russian Criminological Outlook. 2013;3;354—365. (In Russ.)

32. Rossinskiy SB. Problema ispolzovaniya v ugolovnom protsesse rezultatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatelnosti trebuet okonchatelnogo razresheniya [The Problem of Using the Results of Criminal Intelligence and Surveillance Operations Should be Finally Resolved]. Lex russica. 2018;10(143): 70—84. (In Russ.)

33. Solovyov AB. Dokazyvanie v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa [Proving in pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.)

34. Zhogin NV, editor. Teoriya dokazatelstv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Theory of Evidence in the Soviet Criminal Proceedings]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ., 1973. (In Russ.)

35. Trusov AI. Osnovy teorii sudebnykh dokazatelstv [Fundamentals of the theory of judicial evidence]. Moscow: Gosurizdat Publ.; 1960. (In Russ.)

36. Fatkullin FN. Obshchie problemy protsessualnogo dokazyvaniya [General problems of procedural proof]. 2nd. ed. Kazan: Kazan University Publ.; 1976. (In Russ.)

37. Chudinov EM. Priroda nauchnoy istiny [Nature of scientific truth]. Moscow: Librokom Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.)

38. Sheyfer SA. Sobiranie dokazatelstv po ugolovnomu delu: problemy zakonodatelstva, teorii i praktiki [Collecting evidence on a criminal case: problems of legislation, theory and practice]. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.)

39. Sheptulin AP. Dialekticheskiy metod poznaniya [Dialectical Method of Cognition]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ.; 1983. (In Russ.)

40. Yakimovich YuK. Dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse rossii [Evidence and proof in criminal proceedings of Russia]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University; 2015. (In Russ.)