Legal and Bioethical Changes in the Commodification of Human, Including Bioprinted, Organs and Tissues

Modern breakthrough scientific ideas in the field of introduction and development of biomedical technologies have led to a significant objectification of the human body. The paper analyzes the trend of commodification of the human body and its parts from the standpoint of bioethics and law, which determines the consideration of these as goods that participate in economic turnover and have their own price. The problems of insufficiency of human organs suitable for transplantation, the risk of rejection of the transplant by the recipient’s immune system, as well as the need to ensure the safety of donor organs and tissues can be leveled by creating artificial human organs and tissues, including through the use of advanced additive technologies (3D bioprinting), creating a three-dimensional model of a human organ on a cellular basis, which is subject to subsequent transplantation to a recipient in need. The development of 3D-bioprinting allows us to resolve bioethical and legal contradictions caused by the actual inclusion of human organs and tissues in civil (economic) turnover, while international acts enshrine the principle of inadmissibility of commercialization of the human body, by virtue of which the human body and its parts should not be a source of financial benefit. The author summarizes that 3D bioprinting is able to significantly smooth out the negative manifestations of the human body commodification trend. The peculiarity of applying the principle of non-commercialization of the human body is due to the fact that in this case the emphasis is placed on obtaining cellular material for creating a bioprinted human organ. First of all, the principle of non-commercialization of the human body should remain in effect when providing cell material by a third party (donor), even if only in terms of determining the legal regime of cell material and created bioprinted human organs and tissues. If the recipient’s own cells are used, this principle loses its meaning.

3D-bioprinting, biomedicine, bioprinted human organs, donation, human body commodification, new technologies, human organs and tissues, human rights, legal regime, principles, transplantation

1. Ayusheeva IZ. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya dogovornykh otnosheniy v sfere sozdaniya bioprintnykh chelovecheskikh organov [Problems of legal regulation of contractual relations in the process of creating bio-print human organs]. Lex russica. 2019;6:92-99. (In Russ.)

2. Bogdanov DV. Tekhnologiya bioprintinga kak legalnyy vyzov: opredelenie modeli pravovogo regulirovaniya [Bioprinting technology as a legal challenge: Determining the model of legal regulation]. Lex russica. 2019;6:80-91. (In Russ.)

3. Dorogin DA. Protivopravnye deyaniya, svyazannye s organami i (ili) tkanyami cheloveka: ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie: monografiya [Illegal acts related to human organs and (or) tissues: criminal law research: monograph]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2016. (In Russ.)

4. Izutkin DA. Chelovecheskoe telo kak obekt biomeditsinskikh tekhnologiy: filosofskie i eticheskie aspekty [The human body as an object of biomedical technologies: Philosophical and ethical aspects]. Gumanitarnyy vektor. 2018;13(2):76-81. (In Russ.)

5. Kleymenov MP, Senokosova EK. Ugrozy kriminologicheskoy bezopasnosti sistemy okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi i ikh klassifikatsiya [Threats to criminological security of the system of medical care and their classification]. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Journal of Criminology]. 2017;11(4):696-705. (In Russ.)

6. Popova OV. Ot telesnogo kanona Novogo vremeni k osmysleniyu sovremennykh praktik biotekhnologicheskogo konstruirovaniya [From the body Canon of the New time to the understanding of modern practices of biotechnological construction]. Filosofskaya antropologiya [Philosophical anthropology]. 2018;4(2):51-68. (In Russ.)

7. Popova OV. Chelovek, ego tsena i tsennost: k probleme kommodifikatsii tela v nauchnom poznanii [Man, his price and value: On the problem of commodification of the body in scientific knowledge]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science]. 2016;49(3):140-157. (In Russ.)

8. Archpriest Sergiy Filimonov. Sotsialnaya doktrina Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi i pravoslavnoe bogoslovie o transplantatsii [Social doctrine of the Russian Orthodox Church and Orthodox theology on transplantation]. Nefrologiya [Nephrology]. 2011;15(4):104-110. (In Russ.)

9. Sinitsyn SA. Iskovaya zashchita veshchnykh prav v rossiyskom i zarubezhnom grazhdanskom prave: aktualnye problemy [Claim protection of property rights in Russian and foreign civil law: topical issues]. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2015. (In Russ.)

10. Khubulava GG. Religiozno-eticheskiy aspekt transplantatsii [Religious and ethical aspect of transplantation]. Meditsinskiy almanakh [Medical almanac]. 2016;4(44):31-35. (In Russ.)

11. Wenxiang Zhao, Tao Xu. Preliminary engineering for in situ in vivo bioprinting: a novel micro bioprinting platform for in situ in vivo bioprinting at a gastric wound site. Biofabrication. 2020;12:045020. (In Eng.)