Right to Truth in International Justice

The right to truth is a phenomenon that appeared in international law after about the 1980s. Its development is associated with the repression of authoritarian governments in Latin America in the context of basic human rights leveling, which received negative reaction from society. The global need for justice and the preservation of a stable world has led to the gradual expansion of the institute to other regions of the world. The uniqueness of the developed methods allowing us to preserve the memory of large-scale crimes against the person in the public consciousness, to improve and fill in the right to receive information (the right to know), makes it possible to talk about the right to the truth as one of the most promising mechanisms of the human rights protection system. The paper attempts to understand the right to the truth at the present stage, the scope of guarantees it contains, and examines particular cases in relation to the right to know the circumstances of crimes, including cases of enforced disappearance, facts about victims, their fate and location, identification of criminals, rights of victims and their families. The right to the truth is a dynamically developing complex institution of international law, a powerful tool in the hands of international justice bodies in the fight against the perpetrators of the most serious crimes and in the prevention of crimes, a tool for the formation of a truly legal, democratic state. It is based on customary international law, supplemented in general terms by special rules of contract law. The incompleteness of material regulation is compensated by the law enforcement activities of international courts. By its legal nature, the right to the truth is based on positive international obligations of states to prosecute, to provide assistance to other states and international bodies, and on negative obligations as a means of prevention.

1. Abakumova IV, Ryadinskaya EN. Osobennosti postkonfliktnogo vosstanovleniya: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt [Features of post-conflict reconstruction: domestic and foreign experience]. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni V. P. Astafeva [Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University]. 2016;4(38):208-214. (In Russ.)

2. Antonov A, Evseev A. Amnistii v mekhanizme perekhodnogo pravosudiya [Amnesties in the transitional justice mechanism]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International justice]. 2019;1(29):118-133. (In Russ.)

3. Bobrinskiy NA. Postsovetskoe perekhodnoe pravosudie v Rossii: dostizheniya i upushchennye vozmozhnosti [Post-Soviet transitional justice in Russia: achievements and missed opportunities]. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative constitutional review]. 2018;1(122):142-168. (In Russ.)

4. Gabyshev VE, Nelaeva GA, Sidorova NV, Khabarova EA. Rassledovanie genderno obuslovlennogo nasiliya v ramkakh pravosudiya perekhodnogo perioda: opyt Brazilii [Investigating gender based violence in the framework of transitional justice: Brazil case]. Latinskaya Amerika [Latin America]. 2019;8:35-46. (In Russ.)

5. Evseev A. «Prorabotka proshlogo»: slozhnost sudebnogo poznaniya ["Working through the past": The complexity of judicial knowledge]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International justice]. 2017;4(24):122-139. (In Russ.)

6. Zorkin VD. Spravedlivost — imperativ tsivilizatsii prava [Justice: The imperative of civilisation of law]. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of state and law]. 2018;2:67-80. (In Russ.)

7. Kirsch E. Dva elementa v mekhanizme pravosudiya perekhodnogo perioda: mezhdunarodnye ugolovnye sudy i komissii po ustanovleniyu istiny [Two elements in the transitional justice mechanism: International criminal courts and truth commissions]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International justice]. 2013;2(6):74-87. (In Russ.)

8. Klyuchnikov AYu. Razvitie mezhdunarodnogo prava cherez sudebnoe tolkovanie [Development of international law through judicial interpretation]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Juridical Journal]. 2018;4(121):37- 42. (In Russ.)

9. Musaev MA. Osnovy kompleksnoy zashchity zhertv prestupleniy [Fundamentals of comprehensive protection of victims of crime]. Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo [Public and private law]. 2017;1(33):7-31. (In Russ.)

10. Chernyavskiy AG. Vozniknovenie i evolyutsiya mezhdunarodnogo prava: multikulturalizm, partikulyarizm, universalizm — klassifikatsiya i terminologiya [The emergence and evolution of international law. Multiculturalism, particularism, universalism: classification and terminology]. Voennoe pravo [Military law]. 2020;1(59):257-273. (In Russ.)

11. Crane DM. White Man’s Justice: Applying International Justice After Regional Third World Conflicts. Cardozo Law Abstract. 2005-2006;27. (In Eng.)