Court Fine as an Alternative to Criminal Liability
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.169.12.118-130
Abstract
In 2016 the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation was supplemented by article 762 , i.e. an innovative norm on exemption from criminal liability with a court fine. Its novelty is that it provides for: 1) conditional release from criminal liability; 2)the use of a coercive measure against a person who is considered innocent by virtue of the presumption of innocence; 3) its use is associated with the payment of a sum of money to the budget. In addition, the consent of the victim is not required for its application. In practice, there is no uniformity in the interpretation of the new law. The purpose of the paper is to summarize the practice of applying the new norm, conceptualize it and give recommendations on its application. The paper concludes that a court fine is not a liability. Agreeing to pay money to the budget and paying it is a "good deed", a form of making amends for the harm caused by a crime to society as a result of law and order violation. This may be sufficient to release you from liability if there is no victim. The rule on a court fine supplements the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on active repentance (article 75) and reconciliation with the victim (article 76) and is especially relevant in the absence of the victim, when the application of these articles is problematic. If there is a victim, the harm caused to him (including moral) must be compensated. The fact that the consent of the victim and the Prosecutor is not required for the application of a court fine does not mean that the court has the right to ignore their opinion.
About the Author
I. A. KlepitskiyRussian Federation
Ivan A. Klepitskiy, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Boshno SV. Naznachenie sudebnogo shtrafa: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Appointment of a court fine: Issues of theory and practice]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2017;7:114-125. (In Russ.)
2. Golovko LV. Alternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom prave [Alternatives to criminal prosecution in modern law]. St. Petersburg; 2002. (In Russ.)
3. Dudchenko MYu. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: vozmozhnye problemy na praktike [Exemption from criminal liability with a court fine: Possible problems in practice]. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal Procedure]. 2016;10:59-63. (In Russ.)
4. Zvecharovsky IE. O yuridicheskoy prirode sudebnogo shtrafa (st. 762 , 104.4 UK RF) [Legal Nature of a Court Fine (Article 762, 1044 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2016;6:98-101. (In Russ.)
5. Kudryavtseva AV, Sutyagin KI. Sudebnyy shtraf [Court fine]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2016;6:102-110. (In Russ.)
6. Lobanova LV, Mkrtchyan SM. Nekotorye problemy ustanovleniya i realizatsii novogo osnovaniya osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti [Some problems of establishing and implementing a new basis for exemption from criminal liability]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2016;6:111-121. (In Russ.)
7. Lutsenko NS. Sudebnyy shtraf: problemy teorii i pravoprimeneniya: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Judicial fine: Problems of theory and law enforcement. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Krasnoyarsk; 2020. (In Russ.)
8. Molchanov DM, Kulikov AS. Sudebnyy shtraf v UK RF i ugolovno-pravovaya kompensatsiya v UK Respubliki Belarus: sravnitelnyy analiz [Court fine in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and criminal law compensation in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus: A comparative analysis]. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2017;12:125-134. (In Russ.)
9. Poluektov AG. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: teoreticheskiy i prikladnoy aspekty : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Exemption from criminal liability with the imposition of a court fine: Theoretical and applied aspects. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.)
10. Skripchenko NYu. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v svyazi s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: zakonodatelnoe regulirovanie i praktika primeneniya [Exemption from criminal liability in connection with the imposition of a court fine: Legislative regulation and practice of application]. Pravovaya paradigma [Legal Concept]. 2018;2:139-147. (In Russ.)
11. Soktoev ZB. Problemy primeneniya norm o sudebnom shtrafe [Problems of applying the rules on court fines]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2017;1:90-94. (In Russ.)
12. Khlebnitsyna EA. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Exemption from criminal liability with the imposition of a court fine. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.)
13. Khlebnitsyna EA. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: monografiya [Exemption from criminal liability with the imposition of a court fine: A monograph]. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.)
14. Yusupov MYu. Voprosy primeneniya novogo vida osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa [The Application of a New Type of Exemption from Criminal Liability with the Imposition of a Court Fine]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2016;6:122-128. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Klepitskiy I.A. Court Fine as an Alternative to Criminal Liability. Lex Russica. 2020;73(12):118-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.169.12.118-130