Requirements for an Arbitrator: A Comparative Historical Approach

The paper presents a comparative legal and comparative historical analysis of one of the aspects of the institution of the arbitration, namely, the election of an arbitrator. The contractual, non-state nature of arbitration leaves the disputing parties with a wide freedom of expression, including in determining the personality of a mediator or intermediaries in resolving a dispute. The paper focuses on identifying the key features that the disputing parties should pay attention to when choosing an arbitrator (judges). The Roman jurists established comprehensive and justified set of personality traits that an arbitrator should possess in order to maintain the general idea of the conclusiveness of judicial decisions. According to the norms of Roman law, an arbitrator must be a free person, physically healthy, with a developed intellect, with life experience, not tainted by immoral acts, not involved in illegal activities, not interested in a certain outcome of the case. In the Middle Ages, the system of mandatory requirements for a mediator in a dispute was reduced due to the simplification of public relations regulated by customary law, which was reflected in legislative documents. Priority was given to the high social stratum, ethnic and religious conformity of the judge to the disputing persons. In modern times, the freedom of litigants to choose arbitrators is almost absolute, taking into account the tendency to individualize the interests of the parties to the conflict and the inability to take into account all the particular circumstances of various disputes that could affect the choice of an arbitrator. Only when resolving economic disputes, the parties were guided by the judge’s special knowledge, which makes it possible to understand the essence of the property dispute and make a fair decision. The analysis made it possible to identify the continuity of the provisions of Roman law and the requirements imposed on the arbitration intermediary in the Middle Ages and Modern times. Historical comparison revealed a tendency to reduce the number of mandatory features of the candidate for arbitration, which determined the growing importance of the freedom of the disputing parties as the most significant feature of the arbitration court.

1. Volkov AF. Torgovye treteyskie sudy : Ist.-dogmat. issled [Commercial arbitration courts: Historical and doctrinal study]. St. Petersburg: Publ. House of Red. period. izd. M-va fin.; 1913. (In Russ.)

2. Kofanov LL, editor. Digesty Yustiniana = Digesta Iustiniani [Digests of Justinian = Digesta Iustiniani]. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Law, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of World History, Center for the Study of Roman Law. 2nd ed., rev. Moscow: Staut: PG&P; 2008. Vol. 1. Books 1-4: Vol. 1. Book 4. 2008. (In Russ.)

3. Drevnee russkoe pravo: Lektsii 1902/3 akad. g. zasl. ord. prof. Mosk. un-ta D.Ya. Samokvasova [Ancient Russian law: Lectures 1902/3 held by D.Ya Samokvasov, Member of the Academy, Moscow University Honored Professsor. Moscow: Univ. tip.; 1903. (In Russ.)

4. Duvernois NL. Istochniki prava i sud v drevney Rossii : Opyty po istorii rus. grazhd. prava [Sources of Law and the Court in Ancient Russia: Experiments on the History of Russian Civil Law]. Moscow: Univ. tip.; 1869. (In Russ.)

5. Zaytsev AI. Istoriya razvitiya treteyskikh sudov i treteyskogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii do 1917 g. [History of the development of arbitration courts and arbitration proceedings in Russia before 1917]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Herald of Civil Procedure]. 2012;2:89-128. (In Russ.)

6. Ivanov OV. Prava grazhdan pri rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh del [The rights of citizens in the consideration of civil cases]. Moscow: Yurid. lit.; 1970. (In Russ.)

7. Casa I. Arbitrazh (treteyskiy sud): istoriya sozdaniya i pravovaya priroda [Arbitration (arbitration court): History of creation and legal nature]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki [RUDN Journal. Series: Legal Sciences]. 2018;22(2):269-288. (In Russ.)

8. Malysheva KI. Kurs grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: T. 1–3 [A Course on Civil Legal Procedure. Vol. 1-3]. St. Petersburg: Tip. M. Stasyulevich Publ. House, 1874-1879. Vol. 1. 1876. (In Russ.)

9. Letuta TV. Ponyatie, pravovaya priroda treteyskogo suda [Concept, legal nature of the arbitration court]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. 2016;10:76-83. (In Russ.)

10. Locke J. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya: v 2 t. [Selected philosophical works: in 2 vols.]. Transl. form Eng. Moscow: Sotsekgiz; 1960. (In Russ.)

11. Annenkov K. Opyt kommentariya k ustavu grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Experience of commentary to the Charter of civil proceedings]. Vol. 1-6. St. Petersburg: Tip. M. Stasyulevich Publ. House; 1878-1887. Vol. 6. 1887. (In Russ.)

12. Pervoe poslanie k korinfyanam [The First Epistle to the Corinthians]. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Bibliya dlya vsekh: Bibl. shk. Emmaus; 2004. (In Russ.)

13. Abova TE, et al. Rossiyskaya yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya [The Russian Legal Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Infra-M; 1999. (In Russ.)

14. Skvortsov OYu. Treteyskoe razbiratelstvo predprinimatelskikh sporov v Rossii: Problemy. Tendentsii. Perspektivy [Arbitration of Business Disputes in Russia: Trends. Prospects]. Moscow: Volters Kluwer; 2005. (In Russ.)

15. Loginov PV. Treteyskie sudy v SSSR: ucheb.-metod. posobie po grazhd. protsessu dlya studentov vechernego otd-niya yurid. fak. [Arbitration courts in the USSR: A textbook on civil procedure for students of the evening department for Legal Studies]. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow: Moscow University Publ. House; 1963. (In Russ.)

16. Treteyskiy sud po russkomu pravu, istoriko-dogmaticheskoe rassuzhdenie A. Vitsyna [The Arbitration Court under Russian law, A. Vitsin’s historical and dogmatic reasoning]. Moscow: V. Gote Publ. House; 1856. (In Russ.)

17. Kutafin OE, editor. Yuridicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Legal Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Bolshaya rossiyskaya enciklopediya; 2002. (In Russ.)

18. Jarrosson Ch. La notion d’arbitrage. Paris: L. G. D. J. Publ.; 1987. (In Fr.)

19. Kaufmann-Kohler G, Rigozzi A. International Arbitration: Law and Practice in Switzerland. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. (In Eng.)

20. Lew JDM. Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration: A Study in Commercial Arbitration Awards (Oceana Transnational services). New York: Oceana Publications; 1978. (In Eng.)