Main Mechanisms of Correlation between the Subjects of Constitutional Law

The purpose of the paper is to systematize the main mechanisms of the correlation between the subjects of constitutional law and to describe the specifics of each mechanism. The correlation between the subjects of constitutional law means the relationship between the subject and something or someone else in view of its actions or states. If legal relations arise only within the framework of the normatively established rules of behavior, the interaction is also carried out by various subjects in the name of a single common goal, the interrelationship simply represents absolutely any relationship between the subjects, the correlation includes all the listed phenomena, bearing in mind still different ways of life, the emergence of legal relations. One of the sections of this doctrinal concept is the "mechanical" element -- how the participants in the relationship relate to each other, sometimes not directly entering into legal relations, but exerting mutual influence. This element is important both in determining the specific actions of an individual subject, and for building a general systematics of the behavior of subjects, regulated by law. At the same time, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the paper deals exclusively with the mechanisms of correlation of the subjects of constitutional law, which does not always fully comply with the norms of law and has nothing to do with the mechanism of legal regulation. It should also be noted that the author examines only the mechanisms that he considers to be main. And the logic of the presentation is to consider them in such a way that this theoretical construct forms the basis of law-making activity, when actual relationships are primerely taken into account, and only then into account are taken project ideas with the help of which these relationships are expected to be transformed.

1. Agarkov MM. The Ponyatie sdelki po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [The concept of a transaction under the Soviet civil law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1946;3(4):52-53. (In Russ.).

2. Berman GD. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya [The Western tradition of law: the era of formation]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ. House; 1994. (In Russ.).

3. Vysotskiy IV. Osobennosti reprezentatsii nesistemnoy oppozitsii v sotsialnoy seti VKontakte (na primere regionalnogo predstavitelstva shtaba Alekseya Navalnogo) [Peculiarities of the representation of nonsystemic opposition in the social network VKontakte (on the example of the regional representation of the headquarters of Alexei Navalny)]. Alley of Science. 2017;3(16):856-859. (In Russ.).

4. Gaynulina GS, Smirnova AS. The problem of the broader influence of the Presidential Administration in the sphere of exercising power in relation to other bodies of state power. In: Proshchalygina, RA. (editor). Modern problems of the state and law: Proceedings of the regional student scientific conference: in 2 parts. Novosibirsk: Siberian University of Consumer Cooperatives Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

5. Granberg AG, Kistanov V , Adamesku AA. Gosudarstvenno-territorialnoe ustroystvo Rossii [State-territorial structure of Russia]. Moscow: DeKA Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

6. Grebenkov GV. Chelovek v pravovom bytii : vvedenie v pravovuyu personologiyu : monografiya [Man in legal life: Introduction to legal personology: monograph]. Donetsk: Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).

7. Dorozhkin YuN, Musina LM, Shkel SN. Politicheskaya oppozitsiya v postsovetskoy Rossii : monografiya [Political opposition in post-Soviet Russia: monograph]. Ufa: BAGSU Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).

8. Dyui D. Obshchestvo i ego problemy [Society and its problems]. Moscow: Idea-Press; 2002. (In Russ.).

9. Efremov AE. Etapy razvitiya zakonodatelstva SShA po borbe s terrorizmom posle 11 sentyabrya 2001 goda [The development of the USA legislation on the fight against terrorism after 11 September 2001]. Journal of Foreign Law and Comparative Law. 2017;3(64):88-94. (In Russ.).

10. Ivanov VV. Glava subekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii: pravovaya i politicheskaya istoriya instituta [Head of the subject of the Russian Federation: legal and political history of the institute]. Moscow: Praxis Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

11. Kirichek EV. Obshchestvennyy kontrol v Rossii: nekotorye teoretiko-metodologicheskie osobennosti i problemy zakonodatelnogo regulirovaniya [Public control in Russia: some theoretical methodological features and problems of legislative regulation]. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2016;9:43-46. (In Russ.).

12. Kolonchenko DG, Viryasova NV. Kibershpionazh kak sredstvo slezheniya za konfidentsialnoy kompyuternoy informatsiey [Cyber espionage as a means of tracking confidential computer information]. Concept. 2017;39:1946-1950. (In Russ.).

13. Kotlyarevsky SA. Pravovoe gosudarstvo i vneshnyaya politika [The rule-of-law state and foreign policy]. Moscow: G. Lissner and D. Sobko Publishing House; 1909. (In Russ.).

14. Krasavchikov OA. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [Legal facts in Soviet civil law]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat Publ.; 1958. (In Russ.).

15. Krasnov MA. Kto sberezhet konstitutsionalizm? [Who will save constitutionalism?]. In: Strashun BA, Alebastrova IA, editors. Constitutionalism: an ideal and/or reality: Proceedings of the round-table discussion held on February 4, 2011. Moscow: Institute of Law and Public Policy Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).

16. Lyubutin KN Problema subekta i obekta v nemetskoy klassicheskoy i marksistsko-leninskoy filosofii [The problem of subject and object in German classical and Marxist-Leninist philosophy]. Moscow; 1981. (In Russ.).

17. Maltsev GV. Sotsialisticheskoe pravo i svoboda lichnosti [Socialist law and personal freedom]. Moscow; 1968. (In Russ.).

18. Matuzov NI. Aktualnye problemy teorii prava [Actual problems of the theory of law]. Saratov: Saratov State Academy of Law Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).

19. Mikheeva TN, Gornev RV. K voprosu o formirovanii obshchestvennykh sovetov pri organakh mestnogo samoupravleniya [To the question of the formation of public councils under the local government]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2015;8:9-11. (In Russ.).

20. Monastyrskiy YuE. Materialno-pravovye osobennosti trebovaniy ob ubytkakh : monografiya [Substantive features of claims for losses: monograph]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

21. Nechkin AV. Nepopulyarnye reformy v Rossii: ponyatie i vozmozhnye puti legitimatsii [Unpopular reforms in Russia: the concept and possible ways of legitimation]. Electronic Supplement to the Russian Juridical Journal. 2019;4:18-22. (In Russ.).

22. Ostrom V. Smysl amerikanskogo federalizma. chto takoe samoupravlyayushcheesya obshchestvo [The meaning of American federalism. What is a self-governing society]. Moscow: Arena Publ.; 1993. (In Russ.).

23. Pitko EV. «Nepopulyarnye resheniya», ili k voprosu o pensionnoy reforme v Rossii ["Unpopular decisions", or On the issue of pension reform in Russia]. In: Actual problems of modern legislation of the Russian Federation: collection of articles. Compiled by Efimova OV. Saratov: Saratovskiy istochnik Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

24. Kabysheva, SV. Pravovye pozitsii izbiratelnykh komissiy Rossii [Legal positions of election commissions of Russia]. Moscow: Formula Prava Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

25. Pryakhina TM. Sovremennye problemy konstitutsionnogo prognozirovaniya [Modern problems of constitutional forecasting]. In: Strashun BA, Alebastrova IA, editors. Constitutionalism: an ideal and/or reality: Proceedings of the round-table discussion held on February 4, 2011. Moscow: Institute of Law and Public Policy Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).

26. Radchenko AS, Knyshov AA. «Paket Yarovoy» i «Akt patriota»: obshchee i chastnoe ["Yarovaya Package" and "Patriot Act": General and Specific]. Scientific Almanac. 2017;3-1(29):334-336. (In Russ.).

27. Radchenko VI , Uglanova OA. Administratsiya prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii: rabochiy apparat ili chetvertaya vetv vlasti [Administration of the President of the Russian Federation: the working apparatus or the fourth branch of power]. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin. 2017;6(119):109-115. (In Russ.).

28. Sozonova YuS. Partiya «Yabloko»: istoriya, programma, deyatelnost [The Yabloko Party: History, Program, Activities]. Dobroshtan, VM, editor. The Civil Peace — The Civil War: Understanding and Forecasts: Proceedings of an International Scientific Conference. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

29. Sokolova OS Pravovoe regulirovanie uchastiya grazhdan v obshchestvennom kontrole [Legal regulation of citizens’ participation in public control]. Administrative and Municipal Law. 2015;2:133-138. (In Russ.).

30. Tikhomirov YuA. Gosudarstvo : monografiya [The State: Monograph]. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).

31. Tikhomirov YuA. Upravlenie delami obshchestva : (subekty i obekty upravleniya v sotsialnom obshchestve) [Society’s Affairs Administration: (Subjects and objects of administration in a social society). Moscow: Mysl Publ.; 1984. (In Russ.).

32. Uvachev VA. Mekhanizm razdeleniya vlastey v pravovom gosudarstve [The mechanism of separation of powers in a state governed by the rule of law]. Moscow: Perspektiva Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

33. Fedotov VN, Fedotov AV. Territorialnoe obshchestvennoe samoupravlenie: pravo i praktika : konstitutsionnopravovoe issledovanie [Territorial public self-government: Law and practice: constitutional and legal research]. Moscow: Sputnik + Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).

34. Fofanov VP. Sotsialnaya deyatelnost kak sistema [Social activity as a system]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ.; 1981. (In Russ.).

35. Chistyakov OI. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2008. (In Russ.).

36. Ebzeev BS. Konstitutsiya, vlast i svoboda v Rossii : opyt sinteticheskogo issledovaniya [Constitution, power and freedom in Russia: The experience of synthetic research]. Moscow: Prospect Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.).

37. Zenin SS. Development of ideas of sovereignty searching for theological foundations. European Journal of Science and Theology. 2020;16(3):57-66. (In Russ.).