The Right to Choose Non-Law: How to Open Pandora’s Box with Lex Voluntatis
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.181.12.009-021
Abstract
The autonomy of the will of the parties (lex voluntatis) is one of the central institutions of private international law that, in the context of proliferation of non-legal subject matter, multiplying sources of non-state regulation, and also due to the conceptualization of the institution of “rules of law” in the practice of world arbitrations, acquires a new methodological meaning and requires its rethinking. The paper examines the institution of the autonomy of the will of the parties from different angles: as a principle of conflict of laws, as a substantive law institution, and as a mechanism for legitimizing the norms of non-state regulation. The autonomy of the will of the parties today acquires a visible potential of a legal basis for the construction of a special, possibly “hybrid,” regulatory regime for cross-border private law, for mainly contractual relations, it becomes a form of expression of the right to choose non-law. Interpreting the autonomy of the will through the prism of the substantive law theory and in the context of admitting the choice of non-state regulation as the applicable law can pose a serious risk both for the parties to cross-border agreements and for the law-enforcer in terms of conflicting law and non-law. The author concludes that acknowledgement that the institution of autonomy of the will authorizes the right to choose non-law, in fact, means that a fragmented legal space, which itself differs significantly from state to state, can collide with a rapidly scalable, even more heterogeneous non-state array of norms emanating from non-state actors. This state of the normative superstructure can be characterized as a conflict of law and non-law and requires the development and adjustment of an appropriate methodology of private international law.
Keywords
About the Author
M. V. MazhorinaRussian Federation
Maria V. Mazhorina, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Private International Law
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Asoskov AV. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovornykh obyazatelstv [Conflict-of-laws regulation of contractual obligations]. Moscow: Infotropic-Media Publ; 2012 (In Russ.).
2. Beloglavek AI. Evropeyskoe mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo — dogovornye svyazi i obyazatelstva : v 2 t. [European private international law — contractual relations and obligations: in 2 volumes] Vol. 1. Kiev: Taxon Publ.; 2010 (In Russ.).
3. Komarov AS. Vneshneekonomicheskiy dogovor: vybor kontragentami primenimogo prava [An international business agreement: choice of applicable law by counterparties]. In: Komarov AS, editor. Actual legal aspects of modern practice of international commercial turnover: collection of articles. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2016 (In Russ.).
4. Mazhorina MV. O kollizii prava i “neprava», renovatsii lex mercatoria, smart-kontraktakh i blokcheynarbitrazhe [Conflict-of-Law and “Non-Law” Renovation of the Lex Mercatoria, Smart Contracts and Blockchain Arbitration]. Lex russica. 2019;7(152):93-107. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2019.152.7.093-107 (In Russ.).
5. Plekhanov V, editor. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo : sbornik natsionalnykh kodifikatsiy [International private law: collection of national codifications]. Moscow; 2021 (In Russ.).
6. Novikova TV. O podkhodakh k osmysleniyu avtonomii voli v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [About Approaches to Understanding Autonomy of the Will in Private International Law]. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2021;6:183-191. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520015045-0 (In Russ.).
7. Tretyakov SV. Yuridicheskaya priroda avtonomii voli storon v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The legal nature of the autonomy of the will of the parties in private international law: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2003 (In Russ.).
8. Lando O. The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute. Available at: http://translex.uni-koeln.de/114900/_/lando-ole-the-law-applicable-to-the-merits-of-the-dispute-in:-sarcevic-essays-on-international-commercialarbitration-boston-london-1991-at-129-et-seq/#head_21 (Accessed: 11.11.2021) (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Mazhorina M.V. The Right to Choose Non-Law: How to Open Pandora’s Box with Lex Voluntatis. Lex Russica. 2021;74(12):9-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.181.12.009-021