Reasons Why Inflicting Harm is not a Sufficient Indicator of Abuse of the Right

One of the most difficult issues of civil law is the determination of the criteria for abuse of rights prohibited by Article 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Among numerous points of view on this issue, the following has become very widespread in judicial practice: an abuse of the right can be established based on the negative consequences that have occurred for third parties as a result of the exercise of the right. Since these consequences are evident, then the exercise of the right constituted an abuse. Substantial support for this approach is provided by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation opining that the rule of Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is aimed at implementing the principle enshrined in Part 3 of Art. 17 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Having studied the origins of this point of view and its legal foundations, the author noted a number of inherent shortcomings. In particular, this point of view does not distinguish between inflicting unacceptable harm and admissible actions causing harm to another person; it does not take into account the competition of legal norms; it does not take into account that causing harm prohibited by law is an offense and, therefore, it is not an act of exercising subjective rights. These and other shortcomings of the concept of causing harm, noted by the author of the paper, lead to the conclusion that the feature of “causing harm” in itself is insufficient to qualify the act as an act of abuse of the right and the application of Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. In addition to the indicated feature, which is a prerequisite for the application of Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the court must establish another (key) factor, namely: the fact that, in its opinion, allows to distinguish between legal abuse and other lawful and unlawful phenomena.

1. Agarkov MM. Problema zloupotrebleniya pravom v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [The problem of abuse of rights in Soviet civil law]. In: Selected works on civil law: in 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Center YurInfoR Publ.; 2002 (In Russ.).

2. Akhonina YuS. Usloviya realizatsii svobody zaklyucheniya dogovorov v predprinimatelskikh otnosheniyakh : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [Conditions for the implementation of the freedom to conclude contracts in business relations: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2015 (In Russ.).

3. Boldinov YaV. Nedopushchenie zloupotrebleniya pravom kak tsel antimonopolnogo regulirovaniya [Inadmissibility of Abuse of Law as a Purpose of the Anti-Monopoly Regulation]. Jurist. 2018;8:28-33 (In Russ.).

4. Vavilin EV. Mekhanizm osushchestvleniya grazhdanskikh prav i ispolneniya obyazannostey : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [The Mechanism for the implementation of civil rights and the performance of duties: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2009 (In Russ.).

5. Vanin VV, Miroshnik SV. Zloupotreblenie pravom v chastnopravovykh i publichno-pravovykh otnosheniyakh [Abuse of law in private and public law relations]. Civil Law. 2020;5:11-14. DOI: 10.18572/2070-2140-2020-5-11-14 (In Russ.).

6. Gadzhiev GA. Ot pravoprimeneniya do zloupotrebleniya [From law enforcement to abuse]. EZh-Jurist. 2004;42:10-11 (in Russ.)

7. Gribanov VP. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav [Implementation and protection of civil rights]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2001 (in Russ.).

8. Deryugina TV. Teoreticheskie problemy v sfere osushchestvleniya subektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav : dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Theoretical problems in the implementation of subjective civil rights: Doctoral Dissertation]. Volgograd; 2010 (In Russ.).

9. Dolinskaya VV. Problemy vzaimodeystviya deliktnogo prava i prava korporatsiy (korporativnogo prava) [Problems of interaction between tort law and corporation (corporate law)]. Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2020;9:9-17 (In Russ.).

10. Domanzho VP. Vopros ob otvetstvennosti za vred, prichinennyy pri osushchestvlenii prava, v proekte nashego grazhdanskogo ulozheniya [The question of liability for harm caused in the exercise of law in the draft of our civil code]. In: Collection of articles on civil and commercial law. In memory of Professor Gabriel F. Shershenevich. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2005 (In Russ.).

11. Dubinchin AA. Angliyskoe kontraktnoe pravo: statuty, pretsedenty, kommentarii. Ch. 1 : Zaklyuchenie dogovora [English contract law: statutes, precedents, comments. Part 1: Conclusion of a contract]. Yekaterinburg: Uralskiy rabochiy; 2015 (In Russ.).

12. Ibragimova MV. Zloupotreblenie subektivnym grazhdanskim pravom: ponyatie, sushchnost, vidy i posledstviya : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Abuse of subjective civil right: concept, essence, types and consequences: Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Ryazan; 2005 (In Russ.).

13. Kovaleva NA. Zloupotreblenie pravom po grazhdanskomu zakonodatelstvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Abuse of the right under the civil legislation of the Russian Federation: Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2005 (In Russ.).

14. Kurbatov AYa. Printsip nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya pravom: k starym problemam dobavilis novye [The principle of inadmissibility of abuse of law: new problems have been added to the old ones]. Zakon. 2013;9:36-43 (In Russ.).

15. Mazur OV. Trebovanie razumnosti v sootnoshenii s trebovaniem dobrosovestnosti v grazhdanskom prave : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The requirement of rationality in relation to the requirement of good faith in civil law: Author’s Abstract]. St. Petersburg; 2012 (In Russ.).

16. Malein SN. Osushchestvlenie grazhdanskikh prav i problema “zloupotrebleniya pravom” [An exercise of civil rights and the problem of “abuse of the right”]. In: Problems of protection of the rights of citizens and organizations in the light of the provisions of the Constitution of the USSR: Proceedings of VYUZI. Moscow; 1980 (In Russ.).

17. Osmanova DO. Zloupotrebleniya pri nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstve) : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Abuse in insolvency (bankruptcy): Author’s Abstract]. Moscow; 2018 (In Russ).

18. Tokarev DA. Zloupotreblenie pravom v khozyaystvennykh obshchestvakh: usloviya vozniknoveniya i sposoby zashchity : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Abuse of the right in business societies: conditions for the emergence and methods of protection: Author’s Abstract]. Volgograd; 2010 (In Russ.).

19. Filippov PM, Belonozhkin AYu. Novoe opredelenie subektivnogo grazhdanskogo prava i zloupotreblenie im [A new definition of subjective civil right and its abuse]. Volgograd: Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ.; 2009 (In Russ.).

20. Yasser Suleiman Hassan Mohamed. Grazhdansko-pravovaya zashchita ot zloupotrebleniya v prave Rossii i yemena : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Civil protection against abuse in the law of Russia and Yemen: Author’s Abstract]. Kazan; 2005 (In Russ.).