The Concept of “Judicial Doctrine” in Russian Jurisprudence (General Notes)

The paper aims to address the totality of individual terms based on the generic concept of “doctrine”: “legal doctrine”, “scientific doctrine”, “judicial doctrine” the way they are interpreted in modern Russian legal science. Substantially and conceptually, the work anticipates an approach to another subject that is an integral part of the Russian judicial doctrine and the process of its formation, namely the application of the principles and norms of international law in the administration of justice. The paper focuses on some ambiguous interpretations of the understanding of the phenomena that are combined with each other due to the interweaving of the above concepts found in modern domestic and foreign literature, sometimes mixing their external and internal sides, proposed corresponding original solutions or paradoxical qualifications. Two extremes are emphasized in the course of revealing the essence of the analyzed concepts: either an almost arbitrary — mechanical — connection of all the elements present in one case or another into a kind of artificial “complex”, or a declination in favor of only one component as a central (or supporting) component while ignoring the others. Analyzing the legal doctrine as a concept the author differentiates between a category of science and judicial doctrine, and assumes that it is worth avoiding hyperbolization of differentiation between them. On the other hand, it would be fruitless to draw direct lines of their influence on each other. At the same time, when using the term “judicial doctrine”, it is impossible to abstract from the concept of “doctrine” in the general scientific sense. Their mutual intersection with each other, “penetration” into each other are objective. Formulating the conclusions on the problems of the concepts of legal, scientific and judicial doctrine, the author advocates greater caution in making proposals and, at the same time, greater criticism in assessing the already existing conclusions of legal theorists and practitioners.

1. Baranov PP, Ovchinnikov AI. Vneshnie i vnutrennie ugrozy konstitutsionnomu stroyu sovremennoy Rossii [External and internal threats to the constitutional order of modern Russia]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justitia]. 2017;1:44-47 (In Russ.).

2. Gadzhiev KhI. Sudebnye doktriny i effektivnost pravoprimeneniya [Judicial doctrines and the effectiveness of law enforcement]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2019;6:14-27 (In Russ.).

3. Puzikov RV, Zelinsky Ya, Rybakov OYu, et al. Doktrina prava: ponyatie, sushchnost, natsionalnye osobennosti [The doctrine of law: Concept, essence, national peculiarities]. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation; Derzhavin Tambov State University; Scientific Center for Legal Policy of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Tambov: Izdatelskiy dom TGU imeni G. R. Derzhavina; 2016 (In Russ.).

4. Dolzhikov AV. Uzhe pora umom Rossiyu ponimat? Trebovanie prigodnosti v konstitutsionnom pravosudii [Is it time to understand Russia with your mind? The requirement of fitness in constitutional justice]. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review]. 2020;6:51-86 (In Russ.).

5. Zozulya AA. Doktrina v sovremennom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Doctrine in modern law. Author’s abstract of the Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. St. Petersburg, 2006 (In Russ.).

6. Ibragimova YuE. Rol sudebnykh doktrin v praktike arbitrazhnykh sudov [The role of judicial doctrines in the practice of arbitration courts]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2020;4:172-185 (In Russ.).

7. Korkunov NM. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava (po izdaniyu 1898 g.) [Lectures on the general theory of law (according to the edition of 1898)]. St. Petersburg; 2004 (In Russ.).

8. Lazarev VV. Izbrannye trudy: v 3 t. T. 1 [Selected works: in 3 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Novaya yustitsiya; 2010 (In Russ.).

9. Marchenko MN. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudeyskoe pravo [Judicial law-making process andjudge-made law]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2011 (In Russ.).

10. Mozolin VP. Sovremennaya doktrina i grazhdanskoe zakonodatelstvo [Modern doctrine and civil legislation]. Moscow: Yustitsinform; 2008 (In Russ.).

11. Nebratenko OO. Pravovaya doktrina v deyatelnosti Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Legal doctrine in the activities of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskiy sudya [Russian Judge]. 2020;11 (In Russ.).

12. Nersesyants VS. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva [Theory of law and the state]. Moscow: Norma; Infra-M; 2013 (In Russ.).

13. Petrazhitskiy LI. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriey nravstvennosti: v 2 t. [Theory of law and the state in connection with the theory of morality. In 2 vols.]. St. Petersburg; 1910 (In Russ.).

14. Anishina VI, Artemov VYu, Bolshova AK, et al. Pravosudie v sovremennom mire: monografiya [Justice in the modern world: A monograph]. Lebedev VM, Khabrieva TYa, editors. Moscow: Norma; Infra-M; 2012 (In Russ.).

15. Romanova EV. Sudebnaya doktrina v sisteme istochnikov nalogovogo prava SShA: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Judicial doctrine in the system of sources of US tax law. Author’s abstract of the Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow, 2012 (In Russ.).

16. Demidov AI, editor. Rossiyskaya yuridicheskaya doktrina v XXI veke: problemy i puti ikh resheniya: nauch.-prakt. konferentsiya, 3-4 oktyabrya 2001 g. [Russian legal doctrine in the 21st century: Problems and ways to solve them. Scientific and practical conference, October 3-4, 2001]. Saratov; 2001 (In Russ.).

17. Taribo EV. Sudebno-konstitutsionnaya doktrina “fakultativnosti nalogovykh lgot”: predely primeneniya [Judicial constitutional doctrine of “optional tax benefits”: Limits of application]. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya [Journal of Constitutional Justice]. 2003;2:10-17 (In Russ.).

18. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia; 1983 (In Russ.).

19. Dworkin R. Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard: Harvard University Press; 1977.

20. Harris D, Tallon D. Contract Law Today: Anglo-French Comparisons. Oxford, 1989.

21. Glendon M, Gordon M, Osakwe Ch. Comparative Legal Traditions in a Nutshell. Texts, Materials and Cases on the Civil and Common Law Traditions. St. Paul; Minn., 1994.

22. Merryman JH, Pérez-Perdomo R. The Civil War Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. Fourth Edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2018.

23. Peczenik A. Scientia Juris. A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Springer Publishers; 2005.

24. Rubin EL, Feely M. Creating Legal Doctrine. Southern California Law Abstract. 1996:1989-2037.