The Age of Criminal Responsibility: Controversial Issues of Legislation and Practice
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.183.2.046-055
Abstract
One of the most important areas of criminal policy is to increase the effectiveness of the norms of criminal law concerning the responsibility of minors. The paper aims to study criminal law norms that differentiate responsibility depending on the age of the person who committed a crime and the practice of its application. A study carried out using historical and comparative methods showed that the number of crimes, the responsibility for which starts at the age of 14 under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is constantly growing. The number increased from 20 crimes in 1997 to 33 crimes in 2021. The results obtained in the course of the study confirm that the practice of establishing criminal liability for committing a crime from the age of 14 or reducing the already established age from 16 to 14 years based on the mere danger of such a crime cannot be considered justified. Another conclusion drawn from the study is that the Russian law-maker should have taken advantage of the recommendation of the Model Criminal Code for the CIS member states and enshrined the rule that in cases provided for by law (for example, for crimes commited by public officials or military crimes), only a person who has reached an age older than 16 years can be subject to criminal responsibility. Refusal to include in Art. 20 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of the third age (in addition to 16 and 14) of criminal liability has led to the fact that the courts, in particular, do not apply the provisions on «age-related insanity» to persons who have reached 18 years of age at the time of the crime, but who have a mental retardation, which under certain conditions can be considered as a manifestation of age discrimination.
About the Author
K. Z. TrapaidzeRussian Federation
Konstantin Z. Trapaidze, Cand Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration of the Faculty of Management and Politics
prosp. Vernadskogo, d. 76, Moscow, 119454
References
1. Blagov EV. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya): problemy ponimaniya [Criminal community (criminal organization): Problems of Comprehension]. The Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia. 2020;4(79):68-72 (In Russ.).
2. Dolgova AI, editor. Borba s organizovannymi proyavleniyami prestupnosti i obespechenie natsionalnoy bezopasnosti : materialy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii (22–23 yanvarya 2019 g., Moskva) [Combating organized manifestations of crime and ensuring national security: Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference (January 22–23, 2019, Moscow)]. Moscow: Russian Criminological Association; 2019 (In Russ.).
3. Demchuk SD. Ugolovno-pravovye priznaki organizovannoy gruppy [Criminal Law Characteristics of an Organized Group]. Lex russica. 2021;8(177):58-68 (In Russ.).
4. Karelin DV, Shesler AV. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo: problemy zakonodatelnoy reglamentatsii i praktiki primeneniya [The criminal association: problems of legislative regulation and application practice]. Siberian Law Herald. 2015;1(5):5-9 (In Russ.).
5. Kleymenov MP, Kleymenov IM. Razvitie organizovannoy prestupnosti: yavlenie i opredelenie [The Development of organized crime: The phenomenon and definition]. Herald of the Omsk University. Series «Law». 2017;2(51):160-174 (In Russ.).
6. Kleimenov MP, Kleimenov IM, Kozlovskaya MG. Normativnyy podkhod k organizovannoy prestupnosti [Normative approach to organized crime]. Herald of the Omsk University. Series «Law». 2019; 16(1):167-177 (In Russ.).
7. Klimenko YuA. Klassifikatsiya souchastiya: formy, vidy, znachenie dlya ugolovno-pravovoy otsenki prestupleniya [Classification of conspiracy: forms, types, meaning for the criminal-legal assessment of a crime]. Lex russica. 2016;5(114):156-168 (In Russ.).
8. Matskevich IM. Organizovannaya ekonomicheskaya prestupnost [Organized economic crime]. Monitoring of Law Enforcement. 2016;1(18):4-10 (In Russ.).
9. Mondokhonov AN. Problema sootnosheniya ponyatiya organizovannoy prestupnoy gruppy v Konventsii OON protiv transnatsionalnoy organizovannoy prestupnosti i v ugolovnom zakonodatelstve Rossii [The problem of correlation between the concepts of the organized criminal group in the united nations convention against transnational organized crime and in the criminal law of Russia]. Siberian Law Herald. 2012;3(58):77-81 (In Russ.).
10. Ovchinnikova GV. Kommentariy k postanovleniyu Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O sudebnoy praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem» ot 10 iyunya 2010 goda № 12 [Commentary to the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation «On the judicial practice of considering criminal cases on the organization of a criminal community (criminal organization) or participation in it» dated June 10, 2010 No 12]. Popova AN, editor. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Law Institute (branch) of the Academy of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation; 2011 (In Russ.).
11. Prozumentov LM. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya) kak forma souchastiya v prestuplenii [Criminal community (criminal organization) as a form of complicity in a crime]. Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2011;352:138-142 (In Russ.).
12. Skuratov YuI, Glazkova LV, Grudinin NS, Neznamova AA. Razvitie organizovannoy prestupnosti v Rossii: sistemnyy analiz [The Development of Organized Crime in Russia: A System Analysis]. Russian Journal of Criminology. 2016;10(4):638-648 (In Russ.).
13. Tarasevich IA. O protivorechii statey 35 i 282.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossii v kontekste opredeleniya prestupnogo soobshchestva [On the contradiction of articles 35 and 282.1 of the Criminal Code of Russia in the context of the definition of a criminal community]. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research. 2017;3(4):168-181 (In Russ.).
14. Lukyanov VV, Prokhorov VS, Shchepelkova VF, editors. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast [Criminal law of Russia. General part: textbook]. St. Petersburg : St. Petersburg State University Publishing House; 2013 (In Russ.).
15. Revin VP, editor. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii [Criminal law of Russia. General part: textbook]. Moscow: Yustitsinform Publ.; 2016 (In Russ.).
16. Yakusheva TV. Zakonodatelnaya reglamentatsiya i praktika privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Legislative regulation and practice of bringing to criminal responsibility for the organization of a criminal community (criminal organization): Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Moscow; 2016 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Trapaidze K.Z. The Age of Criminal Responsibility: Controversial Issues of Legislation and Practice. Lex Russica. 2022;75(2):46-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.183.2.046-055