Criminal Proceedings and Digital Technologies: Combine or Separate

The purpose of the paper is to analyze the legal regulation and judicial practice of digitalization of criminal proceedings. In modern conditions, rapidly developing technologies are being introduced into all spheres of human life. On the one hand, technologies facilitate and simplify processes, on the other, entail the need to solve specific tasks that did not arise before their use. Criminal proceedings, being a multifaceted and complex activity that affects the most significant human rights, such as life, freedom, inviolability of the home, requires the most careful approach and caution when using digital technologies. However, the essence of the criminal process itself does not exclude the expediency of optimizing the investigation of a criminal case, its consideration and resolution by the court through digitalization. The criminal procedure legislation includes a few norms regulating the use of technologies in criminal proceedings. The draft law, which proposes to introduce norms regulating remote judicial proceedings, does not concern criminal proceedings, which indicates the gradual and cautious digitalization of this area of law enforcement. At the same time, judicial practice dictates the need for detailed regulation of the use of digital technologies in criminal proceedings. Amendments should be made to the Code of Criminal Procedure, providing for the grounds and procedure for remote participation in a court session by means of a web conference for a witness, specialist, and expert. The current level of development of digital technologies makes it possible to use them without negatively affecting the quality of the process, while reducing court costs, terms of consideration of cases and ensuring the protection of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings.

1. Biryukov PN. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i «predskazannoe pravosudie»: zarubezhnyy opyt [Artificial intelligence and «predicted justice»: Foreign experience]. Lex Russica. 2019;(11):79-87. (In Russ.)

2. Borisova LV. Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh stanovleniya i razvitiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v sovremennoy Rossii [About the main directions of formation and development of electronic justice in modern Russia]. Pravo i tsifrovaya ekonomika [Law and the Digital Economy]. 2020;2:32-35. (In Russ.)

3. Bryantseva OV, Soldatkina OL. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Rossii: problemy i puti resheniya [Electronic justice in Russia: Problems and solutions]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Кутафafina (MGYuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. 2019;12:97-104. (In Russ.)

4. Vilkova TYu. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnoy obyazannosti gosudarstva obespechit dostup k pravosudiyu v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy [Implementation of the Constitutional Obligation of the State to Ensure Access to Justice in the Context of Digital Technologies Development]. Aktualʹnye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2020;8:155-163. (In Russ.)

5. Voskobitova LA. Ispolzovanie funktsionalnogo podkhoda dlya tsifrovizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Using a functional approach to digitalize criminal proceedings]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Кутафafina (MGYuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. 2020;10:34-51. (In Russ.)

6. Voskobitova LA. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo i tsifrovye tekhnologii: problemy sovmestimosti [Criminal Justice and Digital Technology: Compatibility Issue]. Lex russica. 2019;5:91-104. (In Russ.)

7. Golovanova NA, Gravina AA, Zaitsev OA, Kashepov VP, Koshaeva TO, et al. Ugolovno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatelnost v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii: monografiya [Criminal jurisdictional activity in the conditions of digitalization. A monograph]. Moscow: IZiSP under the Government of the Russian Federation; LLC «Law firm Contract»; 2019. (In Russ.)

8. Lukyanova IN. Razreshenie sporov onlayn: tekhnologichnyy put k «privatizatsii pravosudiya»? [Online dispute resolution: A technological way to «privatize justice»?]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: Experience, analysis, practice]. 2020;8:45-48. (In Russ.)

9. Marenkov DV. Provedenie onlayn-slushaniy v mezhdunarodnom arbitrazhe vopreki vozrazheniyam odnoy iz storon. Reshenie Verkhovnogo suda Avstrii [Conducting online hearings in international arbitration against the objections of one of the parties. Decision of the Supreme Court of Austria]. Treteysiy sud [Arbitration]. 2020;3-4:120-134. (In Russ.)

10. Maslennikova LN. Kontseptualnyy podkhod k postroeniyu ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, obespechivayushchego dostup k pravosudiyu v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy [A conceptual approach to the construction of criminal proceedings providing access to justice in the context of the development of digital technologies]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Кутафafina (MGYuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. 2020;10:52-65. (In Russ.)

11. Sazonova M. Distantsionnoe uchastie v sudebnom zasedanii [Remote participation in the court session]. Garant.ru. April 19, 2021. (In Russ.)

12. Sofiychuk NV, Kolpakova LA. K voprosu o dostupe grazhdan k pravosudiyu v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [On the issue of citizens’ access to justice in the context of digitalization of criminal proceedings]. Lex russica. 2020;11:71-80. (In Russ.)

13. Spak A. Vyzovy pandemii [Pandemic challenges]. Advokatskaya gazeta. 2020 July. No. 13. (In Russ.)

14. Sheremetev II. Ispolzovanie sovremennykh tsifrovykh tekhnologiy pri sudebnom razbiratelstve ugolovnykh del v distantsionnom rezhime [The use of modern digital technologies in the trial of criminal cases remotely]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Kutafina (MGYuA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)]. 2020;10:97-107. (In Russ.)

15. Shuvalova M. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Rossii: novyy etap [Electronic justice in Russia: A new stage]. Garant. ru. 2020 October 14. (In Russ.)

16. Shulgin EP.Zarubezhnyy opyt deyatelnosti organov, osushchestvlyayushchikh proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v elektronnom formate [Foreign experience in the activities of bodies conducting criminal proceedings in electronic format]. Akademicheskaya mysl. 2019;4:85-89. (In Russ.)

17. Implementing Video hearings (Party-to-State): A Process Evaluation. Dr. Meredith Rossner and Ms. Martha McCurdy, 2018. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/upload [cited 2021 August 25].

18. Sadler K. Realising the potential for video hearings. Sadler. 30 July 2018. Available from: https://insidehmcts.blog.gov.uk/2018/07/30/realising-the-potential-for-video-hearings [cited 2021 August 25].