Procedural Guarantees of the Rights of Participants in Investigative Activities Carried out via a Video Conferencing System

The modern digital transformation of Russian society affects criminal proceedings, which results in the expansion of the scope of application of LegalTech tools in the course of criminal proceedings. The purpose of LegalTech in modern criminal proceedings is to optimize not only the professional activities of the governmental participants in the criminal procedure when they carry out procedural actions and make procedural decisions, but also the procedural mechanism for protecting rights, defending legitimate interests by non-governmental participants in the field of activity under consideration. The results of the analysis of domestic and foreign experience (the Republic of Belarus, Ukraine, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Finland, and the Swiss Confederation), alongside with the position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, makes it possible to conclude that the investigator should use a video conference system during interrogation, confrontation, and identification.

At the same time, the author presents some arguments confirming the need to implement additional legal, organizational, technological measures in pre-trial proceedings in order to overcome the risks of unjustified restriction of the rights and legitimate interests of participants in these investigative actions.

We are talking about expanding the rights of participants in the analyzed investigative actions, clarifying the legal regulation of the procedure for video recording during the production of these actions, regulating the procedural status of the investigator-executor of the order on organizing the participation of a suspect, accused, victim, witness in investigative actions carried out using a video conferencing system, optimizing the technological support of criminal investigation business.

The author proposes to expand the procedural guarantees of the rights of certain social groups who, due to their state of health, social immaturity, lack of technical equipment, are not able to perceive the LegalTech technological tools, when an investigator decides on the production of an investigative action using a video conferencing system.

1. Avdonin KV, Cherkasov VS. Video-konferents-svyaz v sledstvennykh deystviyakh: kak pravilno ispolzovat i chto pomenyat v UPK [Video conferencing in investigative actions: How to use it correctly and what to change in the Criminal Procedure Code]. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal Procedure]. 2018;7:47-49. (In Russ.).

2. Bufetova MSh, Kobzar DN. Primenenie sistem video-konferents-svyazi v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: perspektiva izmeneniya zakonodatelstva [The use of video conferencing systems in criminal proceedings: Prospects of changing legislation]. Advokatskaya praktika [Advocate’s Practice]. 2021;1:14-18. (In Russ.).

3. Voronina NA. Tsifrovizatsiya deyatelnosti organov predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya v period pandemii COVID-19 [Digitalization of the activities of preliminary investigation bodies during the COVID-19 pandemic]. In: Khimicheva OV. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo: sovremennoe sostoyanie i strategiya razvitiya: X Ezhegodnaya Vseros. konferentsiya, 26 noyabrya 2020 g.: sbornik nauch. trudov [Criminal procedure: Current state and development strategy. 10th Annual All-Russian Conference, November 26, 2020. Collection of papers]. Moscow: Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia Publ.; 2021. Pp. 157–159. (In Russ.).

4. Gaas NN. Ispolzovanie video-konferents-svyazi pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy v stadii predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya: izmeneniya, v kotorykh nuzhdaetsya praktika [The use of video conferencing in the production of investigative actions at the stage of preliminary investigation: Changes that practice needs]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [Russian Investigator]. 2021;12:11-15. (In Russ.).

5. Zuev SV. Ugolovno-protsessualnye i operativno-rozysknye sredstva protivodeystviya organizovannoy prestupnosti: monografiya [Criminal procedural and operational investigative means of countering organized crime. A monograph]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).

6. Pashutina OS, Alymov DV. Ochnaya stavka: problemnye aspekty ugolovno-protsessualnogo regulirovaniya [Face-to-Face Interrogation: Problematic Aspects of Criminal Procedural Regulation]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel [Russian Investigator]. 2020;6:13-16. (In Russ.).

7. Pobedkin AV. Distantsionnoe sobiranie dokazatelstv: raspredelenie protsessualnoy otvetstvennosti [Remote collection of evidence: Distribution of procedural responsibility]. In: Kriminalisticheskaya i ugolovnoprotsessualnaya nauka: sovremennoe sostoyanie i tendentsii razvitiya: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konferentsii 7 fevralya 2022 g. [Criminalistic and Criminal procedure science: Current state and development trends. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference held on February 7, 2022]. Karaganda: Karaganda Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after Berimbek Beisenov Publ.; 2022. Pp. 199–202. (In Russ.).

8. Trefilov AA. Informatizatsiya ugolovnogo protsessa Shveytsarii [Informatization of the Swiss criminal procedure]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya [Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law]. 2019;2:87-92. (In Russ.).

9. Ugolovno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatelnost v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii: monografiya [Criminal-jurisdictional activity in the conditions of digitalization. A monograph]. Moscow: IZiSP, Kontrakt Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

10. Shcherba S, Arkhipova E. Pravovye osnovy primeneniya video-konferents-svyazi v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii i perspektivy ikh sovershenstvovaniya [The legal basis for the use of video conferencing in criminal proceedings in Russia and the prospects for their improvement]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law]. 2014;4:109-117. (In Russ.).

11. Yarkov AA. Ukhudshenie kachestva svyazi pri ispolzovanii sistem video-konferents-svyazi [Impairment of communications quality when using video conferencing systems]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure]. 2018;10:16-18. (In Russ.).