The Complexity of Crime Classification in Establishment of Alternative and Indefinite Types of Intent

The paper discusses the scientific and law enforcement aspects of understanding the types of intent in criminal law. The law enforcement and doctrinal features of alternative and indefinite types of intent and the problems associated with their establishment in the law of Russia and Belarus are considered. The paper analyzes the law enforcement practice and pressing issues of interpretation of the intentional form of guilt in accordance with the provisions of the current legislation of Russia and Belarus. The purpose of the paper is a rational and critical consideration of the provisions of the science of criminal law in relation to the question of the classification of criminal acts with an indefinite (unspecified) intent. The author concludes that when establishing the elements of an indefinite (unspecified) intent, the criminal act should be evaluated by the actual consequences. However, it is an inchoate offense that possesses the specifics of classification in this matter. Therefore, in such cases, it is necessary to establish the actual direction of the actions of the perpetrator, based on the objective situation of the act committed, the tools used, the means of committing the crime, the physical data of the victim and the accused, etc. The author proposes to pay attention to the following things in cases of crimes against life and health: the nature and method of utilizing the instrument of crime, its danger, the commission of actions that objectively pose a danger to human life; the intensity of damage, their localization, the possession of special skills and abilities to cause physical harm; the striking force of the impact, the physical data of the victim and the accused, the conscious nature of the guilty person’s behavior; the reasons for termination of criminal actions by the accused, his relationship with the victim on the eve of the crime, the subsequent behavior of the guilty and the victim. Research methods used in the paper are formal-dogmatic, comparative-legal, instrumental analysis. Scope of application: jurisprudence, law enforcement practice, lawmaking, lawmaking.

1. Abakshina NA. Vklad lekseya Ivanovicha Raroga v aktualizatsiyu psikhologicheskogo soderzhaniya viny [Alexey Ivanovich Rarog’s contribution to the actualization of the psychological content of guilt]. In: Rarog AI, editor. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XIX Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konferentsii [Criminal Law: Development strategy in the 21st century. Procs. of the 19th International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2022. Pp. 622–628. (In Russ.).

2. Babiy N. Umyshlennoe prichinenie tyazhkogo telesnogo povrezhdeniya: postanovlenie prinyato — voprosy ostalis [Intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm: Decision is made, questions remained]. Yustitsiya Belarusi [Justice of Belarus]. 2006;6:41-46. (In Russ.).

3. Vishnyakova NV. Edinstvo umysla kak priznak prodolzhaemogo khishcheniya [Unity of intent as a sign of continued theft]. Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2015;2:16-19. (In Russ.).

4. Gudimov AS. K voprosu o nekonkretizirovannom umysle pri umyshlennom prichinenii sredney tyazhesti vreda zdorovyu [On the issue of unclassified intent in the deliberate infliction of moderate harm to health]. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie [Man: Crime and punishment]. 2007;1:104-106. (In Russ.).

5. Dagel PS, Kotov DP. Subektivnaya storona prestupleniya i ee ustanovlenie [The subjective side of the crime and its establishment]. Voronezh: Voronezh University Publishing House; 1974. (In Russ.).

6. Zlobin GA, Nikiforov BS. Umysel i ego formy [Intent and its forms]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1972. (In Russ.).

7. Karpets II. Prestupnost: illyuzii i realnost [Crime: Illusions and reality]. Moscow: Ros. pravo Publ.; 1992. (In Russ.).

8. Kovalchuk A, Hilyuta V. Zashchita vladeniya v ugolovnom prave i pravila opredeleniya ushcherba pri sovershenii khishcheniy [Protection of possession in criminal law and rules for determining damage in the commission of theft]. Sudovy vesnik. 2018;2:42-45. (In Russ.).

9. Korableva SYu, Kazakova VA. Vina kak ugolovno-pravovaya kategoriya i ee vliyanie na kvalifikatsiyu [Guilt as a criminal legal category and its influence on classification]. Moscow: Nauchnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

10. Gruntov IO, Shidlovskiy AV, editors. Kurs ugolovnogo prava: v 5 t. Obshchaya chast. T. 1: Uchenie o prestuplenii [Course of criminal law: in 5 vols. General Part. Vol. 1: The Doctrine of Crime]. Minsk: BSU Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

11. Popov AN. Vina v prestupleniyakh protiv zhizni (st. 105, 106, 107, 108 UK RF) [Guilt in crimes against life (Articles 105, 106, 107, 108 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)]. St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterb. yurid. in-t Gener. prokuratury RF Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

12. Rastoropov SV. O kontseptsii viny v sostavakh prestupleniy protiv zdorovya cheloveka [On the concept of guilt in the composition of crimes against human health]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy [Russian Journal of Legal Studies]. 2015;2:145-151. (In Russ.).

13. Semchenkov IP. Aktualnye problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy, sovershaemykh s alternativnym umyslom [Actual problems of qualification of crimes committed with alternative intent]. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013;2:25-30. (In Russ.).

14. Lopashenko NA, editor. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast. Prestuplenie. Kn. 2: Subektivnaya storona prestupleniya [Criminal Law. General Part. Crime. Vol. VII. Book 2: The subjective side of the crime]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

15. Hilyuta V. Opredelenie poterpevshey storony po ugolovnym delam o khishcheniyakh [Determination of the injured party in criminal cases of embezzlement]. Zakonnost. 2019;12:46-48. (In Russ.).

16. Khilyuta VV. Opredelenie poterpevshey storony po ugolovnym delam o khishchenii [Determination of the injured party in criminal cases of embezzlement]. Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2020;2:611. (In Russ.).