A Socio-Economic Formation: Problems of Efficiency and Low Level of Anti-Corruption Security

The paper examines the influence of socio-economic formation on crime. The author comes to the conclusion that the determinism of the existing economic, social and regulatory causes of corruption is based on an inefficient socio-economic formation. The author notes that an inefficient form of public administration, as well as a type of socio-economic formation, are not able to eliminate the causes of corruption, since this formation does not at all imply elimination of these causes, but, on the contrary, contributes to their existence and development. This takes place due to the fact that the form of public administration limits the possibility of applying and implementing a different, more effective form of public administration and socio-economic formation.
Corruption as a phenomenon exists in a socio-economic formation in which socially useful principles, guidelines and attitudes are poorly organized or absent. The use of effective measures to combat corruption is not possible in the socio-economic formation where the main vices of society still exist or are idealized: selfishness, greed, thirst for power, excessive exploitation of an individual, etc. A corrupt behavior model becomes the norm in a situation when the state power and the state economy are dependent on private capital and investors.
The author comes to the conclusion that the use of combined forms of public administration is effective and expedient. An effective use of combined forms of public administration can eliminate the main set of causes, circumstances and conditions that contribute to the emergence, growth and development of both corruption and crime in the country as a whole.
A combined form of public administration presupposes the uniform participation of society, business entities and authorities in the implementation of socio-economic policy, which has common socially useful goals based on socially useful attitudes and guidelines.

1. Damm IA. Predposylki formirovaniya antikorruptsionnoy bezopasnosti RF [Prerequisites for the formationof the anti-corruption security theory in the russian federation]. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2021;14(11):1690-1709. (In Russ.).

2. Kipkeeva ZB. Potomki Chingizkhana v istorii Severnogo Kavkaza XVIII–XIX vv. [Descendants of Genghis Khan in the history of the North Caucasus of the 18th–19th centuries]. Stavropol: NCFU Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).

3. Kozlov YuM, Frolov ES. Nauchnaya organizatsiya upravleniya i pravo [Scientific organization of management and law]. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University; 1986. (In Russ.).

4. Dolgova AI, editor. Kriminologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Criminology: textbook for universities]. 4th ed. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

5. Kuznetsov IV. Krepost v stepi [Fortress in the steppe]. Stavropol: Book Publishing House; 1987. (In Russ.).

6. Lenin VI. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy The complete works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Politizdat Publ.; 1967. (In Russ.).

7. Luneev VV. Nastoyashchey borby s korruptsiey v Rossii net [There is no real fight against corruption in Russia]. Criminal Law. 2007;5:104-108. (In Russ.).

8. Marx K. Kapital [Capital]. Vol. 1. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature; 1949. (In Russ.).

9. Maslakova EA. Kriminologiya: uchebnoe posobie [Criminology: a textbook]. Orel: RANEPA Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.).

10. Popov LL. Problemy administrativnykh reform v Rossii [Problems of administrative reforms in Russia]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2018;1:24-30. (In Russ.).

11. Rosenthal MM, Yudin PF. Filosofskiy slovar [Philosophical Dictionary]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ.; 1963. (In Russ.).

12. Sergeev AL. Politiko-pravovye transformatsii ekonomiki v kontseptsii kubinskogo sotsializma [Political and legal transformations of the economy in the concept of Cuban socialism]. Lex russica. 2022;2(183):64-76. (In Russ.).

13. Starilov YuN. Administrativnye protsedury — neotemlemaya chast zakonodatelstva o gosudarstvennom i munitsipalnom upravlenii: problemy teorii, praktiki i zakonotvorchestva [Administrative procedures are an integral part of the legislation on state and municipal administration: problems of theory, practice and lawmaking]. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2019;4(39):8-27. (In Russ.).

14. Starilov YuN. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v sisteme edinoy publichnoy vlasti: terminologicheskiy itog konstitutsionnoy reformy [Public administration in the system of unified Public Authority: terminological outcome of the constitutional reform]. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2020;1(40):20-31. (In Russ.).

15. Chernyshevsky NG. Chto delat? [What should be done?]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).