Postclassical Rationality of Law in the Era of Postmodernity

The paper provides for debatable issues of rationality as a general philosophical category and as a legal concept. The author argues for the transition in philosophy and science from classical rationality to postclassical. Classical rationality is based on the presumption of the knowability of the world and the possibility of its transformation in accordance with the reasonable goals of the progressive development of mankind. However, the 20th century demonstrated the limitations of the human mind, unpredictability of the consequences of applying scientific rationality. Hence, the paradox of classical rationality follows: its growth, associated (or manifested) with the development of technology and technology, turns into an increased risk in all spheres of life. Post-classical rationality (post-non-classical, according to V. S. Stepin’s terminology) not only postulates the limitations of our knowledge about an opaque and stochastic world where uncertainty reigns, but also it assumes the involvement of a person socialized in the corresponding culture in the process of cognition (more broadly, perception, nomination, classification and categorization of the world and its development), its historical, valuebased and socio-cultural contextuality. The most developed and elaborated variant of postclassical rationality is the communicative contextuality which, however, is not devoid of problematic issues.
According to the author, postclassical rationality of law is dialogical and it includes a transcendent aspect — ensuring the normal reproduction of humanity -- and an immanent one — the legitimacy of the accepted norms of law also in the process of their reproduction. Postclassical rationality of the law norms construction is expressed in the struggle of the main social groups for the right to determine the significance (including legal) of various social problems. The rationality of the implementation of the norms of law is problematized by the paradox of «following the rule» elaboarted by by L. Wittgenstein that never contains the entirety of the prescriptions of its — rule — implementation. The author believes that in order to resolve the problems of rationality of law it is necessary to reconsider classical rationality of law as a postclassical rationality, rather than to reject this category and principle of law.

1. Batishchev GS. Dialogizm ili polifinizm? (Antitetika v ideynom nasledii M. M. Bakhtina) [Dialogism or polyphinism? (Antithetics in the ideological heritage of M.M. Bakhtin)]. In: M.M. Bakhtin as a philosopher. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1992. (In Russ.).

2. Baker GP, Hacker PMS. Skeptitsizm, pravila i yazyk: nauchnoe izdanie [Skepticism, Rules and Language: a scientific publication]. Moscow: Canon+: ROOI «Rehabilitation» Publ.; 2008. (In Russ.).

3. Bourdieu P. Vlast prava: osnovy sotsiologii yuridicheskogo polya [The power of law: fundamentals of the sociology of the legal field]. In: Smatko NA, editor. Bourdieu P. Social Environ: fields and practices. Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology; St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2005. (In Russ.).

4. Weber M. Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchey sotsiologii [Economy and society: essays of understanding sociology]. Vol. 1: Sociology. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2016. (In Russ.).

5. Weber M. Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchey sotsiologii [Economy and society: essays of understanding sociology]. Vol. 3: Law. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2018. (In Russ.).

6. Giddens E. Posledstviya sovremennosti [Consequences of modernity]. Moscow: Praxis Publ.; 2011. (In Russ.).

7. Giddens E. Ustroenie obshchestva: Ocherki teorii strukturatsii [Organization of society: Essays on the theory of structuration]. Moscow: Academic project Publ.; 2003 (Russ.).

8. Calabresi G. Budushchee prava i ekonomiki. Ocherki o reforme i razmyshleniya [The future of law and economics. Essays on reform and reflections]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute; 2016. (In Russ.).

9. Karapetov AG. Ekonomicheskiy analiz prava [Economic analysis of law]. Moscow: Statute Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

10. Kasatkin SN. Problema sledovaniya pravilu: Khart i Vitgenshteyn [The problem of following the rule: Hart and Wittgenstein]. In: L. Wittgenstein: pro et contra, anthology. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: RHGA Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

11. Kripke SA. Vitgenshteyn o pravilakh i individualnom yazyke [Wittgenstein on rules and individual language]. Moscow: Canon +: ROOI «Rehabilitation» Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

12. Lisanyuk EN. Argumentatsiya i sledovanie pravilu [Argumentation and following the rule]. In: L. Wittgenstein: pro et contra, anthology. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: RHGA Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

13. Moren E. O slozhnosti [About complexity]. Moscow: IOI Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).

14. Porus VN. Ratsionalnaya kommunikatsiya kak problema epistemologii [Rational communication as a problem of epistemology]. Kommunikativnaya ratsionalnost: epistemologicheskiy podkhod [Communicative rationality: an epistemological approach]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy; 2009. (In Russ.).

15. Porus VN. Ratsionalnost. Nauka. Kultura [Rationality. Science. Culture]. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.).

16. Stepin VS. Nauchim ratsionalnost v tekhnogennoy kulture: tipy i istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Let’s teach rationality in technogenic culture: types and historical evolution]. In: Guseynov AA, Lektorskiy VA, editors. Rationality and its boundaries: Proceedings of the international scientific conference «Rationality and its boundaries.» International Institute of Philosophy in Moscow (September 15–18, 2011). Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences; 2012. (In Russ.).

17. Foucault M. Etika zaboty o sebe kak praktika svobody [Ethics of self-care as a practice of freedom]. In: Bolshakov VP, editor. Foucault M. Intellectuals and Power: Selected political articles, speeches and interviews. Part 3. Moscow: Praxis Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).

18. Hayek F. Pravo. Zakonodatelstvo i svoboda: Sovremennoe ponimanie liberalnyh principov spravedlivosti i politiki [Law. Legislation and Freedom: A Modern Understanding of the liberal principles of Justice and Politics]. Moscow: IRISEN Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).

19. Shapiro Y. Begstvo ot realnosti v gumanitarnyh naukah [Escape from reality in the humanities]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2011. (In Russ.).

20. Shvyrev VS. Racionalnost v spektre ee vozmozhnostej [Rationality in the spectrum of its possibilities]. In: Lektorskiy, editor. Istoricheskie tipy racionalnosti [Historical types of rationality]. Vol. 1. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).

21. Dennet DC. Brainstorms. Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery Vt.: Bradford Books; 1978.

22. Habermas J. Technik und Wissenschaft als «Ideologie». Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1968.

23. Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2nd Bd. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981.