Administrative Investigation conducted by the National Guard Troops Officials as an Institution of Military and Administrative Law Needs to Be Improved
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.188.7.131-138
Abstract
Based on the analysis of regulatory legal acts, the concept and features of conducting an administrative investigation provided for by both military legislation and administrative legislation are revealed. The grounds, objectives and procedure for conducting an administrative investigation are analyzed. Attention is given to the fact that in the field of military-service relations, an administrative investigation is conducted against subordinate military personnel, while administrative legislation prescribes an administrative investigation against individuals and organizations that are not organizationally subordinate to the National Guard troops. The errors affecting the recognition by the court of the procedural order for conducting an audit, as well as an administrative investigation, as illegal or unjustified are indicated. We are talking about the fact that a legal unit participates in the administrative investigation (proceedings). At the same time, the administrative legislation considers this procedure differently. It is mentioned that if the level of competence in a military unit is assessed by the commander (chief), then the competence of officials is assessed by the court, which is authorized either to approve the decision taken or to cancel it. It is substantiated that the initiator of the administrative investigation is the appropriate commander (chief), who appoints such an investigation independently or on the basis of a written report of a serviceman, notification of a medical organization, notification of law enforcement agencies, notification (messages, statements) of other persons, including relatives of the injured serviceman. The reason for conducting an administrative investigation is a ruling on conducting an administrative investigation made based on a decision of an official. The mixing of the two forms of inspections in practice leads to the incorrect application of regulatory legal acts, which creates confusion. This leads to the fact that an administrative investigation in the field of military service relations should be called differently, removing the term «administrative investigation» from circulation.
About the Author
V. M. ShenshinRussian Federation
Viktor M. Shenshin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law
Moskovsky prosp., d. 149, St. Petersburg, 196105
References
1. Bakhrah DN. Administrativnoe pravo [Administrative law]. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.).
2. German ES. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya, primenyaemykh voennosluzhashchimi voysk natsionalnoy gvardii [Problems of legal regulation of administrative coercion measures used by service members of the National Guard troops]. Voennoe pravo [Military law]. 2017;6(46). (In Russ.).
3. German ES. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh kak osobaya protsessualnaya forma realizatsii administrativno-protsessualnogo statusa fizicheskikh lits [Proceedings on cases of administrative offenses as a special procedural form of realization of the administrative procedural status of individuals]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya «Pravo» [Vestnik NSU. Series «Law»]. 2010;6(2). (In Russ.).
4. Koryakin VM, Kudashkin AV, Fateev KV. Voenno-administrativnoe pravo (voennaya administratsiya) [Military administrative law (military administration)]. Moscow: Za prava voennosluzhashchikh Publ.; 2008. (In Russ.).
5. Nazarova IS, Shenshin VM. K voprosu o zakreplenii prikazom rukovoditelya federalnogo organa ispolnitelnoy vlasti formy protokola ob administrativnom pravonarushenii [On the issue of fixing the form of the protocol on an administrative offense by the order of the head of the federal executive authority]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess [Administrative Law and Procedure]. 2022;1:38-41. (In Russ.).
6. Telegin AS. Rassledovanie administrativnykh pravonarusheniy: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Investigation of administrative offenses. Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Sverdlovsk; 1983. (In Russ.).
7. Shenshin VM. Kontseptsiya administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatelnosti Rosgvardii: tochka zreniya [The concept of administrative and jurisdictional activity of Rosgvardiya: A viewpoint]. Voennoe pravo [Military law]. 2020;1(59):56-61. (In Russ.).
8. Shenshin VM. O nekotorykh osobennostyakh provedeniya administrativnykh rassledovaniy v voyskakh natsionalnoy gvardii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [About some features of conducting administrative investigations in the troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation]. Pravo v vooruzhennykh silakh [Law in the Armed Forces — Military Legal Review]. 2017;8(241):12-15. (In Russ.).
9. Shenshin VM. Oformlenie protokola ob administrativnom pravonarushenii dolzhnostnymi litsami voysk natsionalnoy gvardii pri osushchestvlenii imi administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatelnosti: voprosy primeneniya [Protocol on an administrative offense registration by officials of the National Guard troops when they carry out administrative and jurisdictional activities: issues of application]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justitia]. 2020;2:22-24. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shenshin V.M. Administrative Investigation conducted by the National Guard Troops Officials as an Institution of Military and Administrative Law Needs to Be Improved. Lex Russica. 2022;75(7):131-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.188.7.131-138