Revisiting the Real Scope of the Obligation to Compensate for Harm to Health: The Way to Individualization of Tort Liability?

The paper is devoted to the problem of determining the real scope of tort liability for harm caused to health in the context of the mutual influence of the relevant legal design and alternative compensation forms, as well as an attempt to reconsider detected imbalances from the standpoint of existing, traditional and innovative theoretical concepts. It is established that modern legislation and practice leads to inconsistent use of recourse and quasi-recourse rights of claims for the purpose of holding liable a direct causer of physical harm and (or) expanding the scope of such liability, which requires justification of the conceptual principles of the adopted approach, allowing to narrow all cases of this kind to a single system. It is noted that the relations concerning compensation for harm to health provide extensive ground for discussing individualizing educational and preventive principles of tort liability, not related to the use of such a means of protecting a violated right as compensation for moral harm, which is caused by the conditional nature of the list of losses and costs provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 1085 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, by the existence of alternative ways to assess physical harm, implemented in special types of insurance and by the lack of a unified system for determining the consequences of causing damage to health and other factors. The author proposes the mechanism of objectification in the norms of civil law of the corresponding doctrinal decision applicable in combination with the current legal regulation of insurance means of compensation, constructions of liability for third parties and liability regardless of fault. Implementation of this proposal also requires departure from the restrictive method of determining the amount and nature of the harm caused to health to be compensated based on the norms of social security law and to make necessary amendments to Section 2 of Chapter 59 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

1. Arslanov KM. Grazhdansko-pravovoe (chastnoe) nakazanie za delikt: preduprezhdenie, «lichnoe udovletvorenie» v grazhdanskom prave [Civil (private) punishment for tort: prevention, «personal satisfaction» in civil law]. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2015;2:241-247. (In Russ.).

2. Belikova KM, Rumyantsev MB. Nekotorye razmyshleniya o prichinenii vreda istochnikom povyshennoy opasnosti v prave RF i SShA [Some reflections on causing harm by a source of increased danger in the law of the Russian Federation and the USA]. Law and Politics. 2018;5:29-41. (In Russ.).

3. Bogdanov DE. Triedinaya sushchnost spravedlivosti v sfere deliktnoy otvetstvennosti [The triune essence of justice in the field of tort liability]. Journal of Russian Law. 2013;7:49-62. (In Russ.).

4. Bogdanov DE, Bogdanova EE. K voprosu o nekompensatsionnykh ubytkakh v grazhdanskom prave Rossii [Revisiting the Non-Compensatory Damages under the Civil Law of Russia]. Civil Law. 2017;2:7-10. (In Russ.).

5. Budylin SL. Sverkh kompensatsionnye ubytki. Vozmozhnosti ikh vzyskaniya v Rossii i za rubezhom [Overcompensatory losses. The possibilities of their recovery in Russia and abroad]. Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2014;4:116-125. (In Russ.).

6. Volos AA. Printsipy obyazatelstvennogo prava: monografiya [Principles of the Law of Obligations: monograph]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

7. Deryugina SR. Pravovye osobennosti deliktnykh obyazatelstv, voznikayushchikh pri prichinenii vreda istochnikom povyshennoy opasnosti [Legal features of the tort obligations arising at causing of harm by the source of the increased danger]. Juridical Journal of Samara University. 2020;6(1):145-151. (In Russ.).

8. Egorova MA, Krylov VG, Romanov AK. Deliktnye obyazatelstva i deliktnaya otvetstvennost v angliyskom, nemetskom i frantsuzskom prave: uchebnoe posobie [Tort obligations and tort liability in English, German and French law: a textbook]. Moscow: Justicinform Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).

9. Krasnova SA. Sverkhkompensatsionnaya zashchita v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave: formy i predely [Overcompensation in Russian Civil Law: Forms and Limits]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2020;1:68-110. (In Russ.).

10. Tarasenko OA. Problemy ucheniya o grazhdansko-pravovoy otvetstvennosti [Problems of the Civil Liability Doctrine]. Lex russica. 2017;5(126):11-23. (In Russ.).

11. Li Ch. Sootnoshenie vinovnoy i bezvinovnoy otvetstvennosti v deliktnykh obyazatelstvakh [The ratio of guilty and innocent liability in tort obligations]. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2013;4:53-63. (In Russ.).

12. Markina MV. Osnovnaya i subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost za prichinenie vreda litsom, zastrakhovavshim svoyu grazhdansko-pravovuyu otvetstvennost za prichinenie vreda [Primary and Subsidiary Liability for Infliction of Harm by a Person Having Insured its Civil Liability for Infliction of Harm]. Jurist. 2021;6:33-35. (In Russ.).

13. Matantsev DA. Osnovaniya deliktnoy otvetstvennosti v rimskom i sovremennom evropeyskom grazhdanskom prave [Grounds of Tort Liability in Roman and Modern European Civil Law]. Legal Science. 2021;11:110-114. (In Russ.).

14. Rodionova OM. Mekhanizm grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya: deyatelnostno-dogmaticheskiy podkhod: monografiya [Mechanism of civil law regulation: activity-dogmatic approach: monograph]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).

15. Rumyantsev MB. Bezvinovnaya otvetstvennost — odin iz vektorov razvitiya deliktnogo prava v Rossii i SShA [Bezvinovnaja responsibility — one of vectors of development of a law of torts to Russia and the USA]. Sovremennoe pravo. 2011;11:46-49. (In Russ.).

16. Sarbash SV. Elementarnaya dogmatika obyazatelstv: uchebnoe posobie [Elementary dogmatics of obligations: a textbook]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

17. Chulyukova SA. K probleme pravovogo regulirovaniya vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo zhizni grazhdanina [To the issue of legal regulation of compensation caused life citizen]. Law and State: The Theory and Practice. 2018;9(165):94-99. (In Russ.).

18. Shiminova MYa. Kompensatsiya vreda grazhdanam: grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie [Compensation for harm to citizens: civil law regulation]. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1979. (In Russ.).

19. Koziol H. Punitive Damages — A European Perspective. Louisiana Law Review. 2008;68:741-764. (In Russ.).

20. Underwood J. Tort Law: Principles in Practice. New York: Wolters Kluwer; 2022. (In Russ.).