International Tax Policy: the Russian Federation, the European Union and «Double Standards»

The article analyzes the reasons why the European Union classifies the Russian Federation as an offshore state (including Russia in the next edition of the list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions). The study determines the objectives of introducing the legal design of an international holding company into the domestic tax legislation and the tasks for which it is used. The paper proves that classification of special economic districts «Oktyabrsky Island of the Kaliningrad region» and «Russian Island of the Primorsky Territory» as low-tax jurisdictions aimed at assisting foreign organizations in tax evasion is unfounded. The paper examines legal innovations introduced into the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in order to exclude Russia from the European list of offshores. It is established that their application will potentially have a negative impact on the amount of budget revenues, and will also lead to the erosion of the foundations of state policy on deoffshorization of the Russian economy. The author gives negative assesment of haste adoption of amendments to the Tax Code of the Russian Federation and their insufficient elaboration during the legislative process. The paper compares the states and territories classified as offshore by the Russian Federation and the European Union and describes low-tax jurisdictions associated with the major EU members, as well as the UK and Switzerland. The paper highlights a transit nature of the economies of a number of European Union members (the Republic of Cyprus, Malta, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, etc.) when moving financial assets from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax ones. The above allows the author to come to unsatisfactory conclusions concerning «integrity» of the international tax policy of European states. The author used analytical and comparative legal methods to perform the study.

1. Aganbegyan AG. Kak vozobnovit sotsialno-ekonomicheskiy rost v Rossii? [How to resume socio-economic growth in Russia?]. Scientific Works оf the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2020;2:164-182. (In Russ.).

2. Andrianov VD, Krivopustova ES. Prichiny, dinamika i masshtaby ottoka kapitala iz ekonomiki Rossii [The reasons, dynamics and scale of capital outflow from Russian economy]. Russial Journal of Money and Finance. 2015;2:61-65. (In Russ.).

3. Bagaeva AV. Assotsiirovannye otnosheniya gosudarstv i novaya regionalnaya klientela [Associated Relations of the States and New Regional Clientele]. Observer. 2014;10:40-47. (In Russ.).

4. Bobrova AV, Vopilova SN. Rol ofshornykh zon v natsionalnoy ekonomike Rossii [The role of offshore zones in the national economy of Russia]. Management in Modern System. 2018;4:89-97. (In Russ.).

5. Bulatov AS. Sovremennaya rossiyskaya ekonomicheskaya model i ee vneshneekonomicheskie aspekty [Today’s Russian economic system and its external economic aspects]. Russia and the Contemporary World. 2020;2:158-168. (In Russ.).

6. Bulatov AS, Kuznetsov AV, Platonova IN, Kvashnin YuD, Pertseva SYu, Rebrey SM, Senyuk NYu, Tatulov KG. Rossiya v mezhdunarodnom dvizhenii kapitala v 2014–2015 godakh [Russia in the international capital movement in 2014–2015]. Vestnik of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016;5:422-433. (In Russ.).

7. Krokhina YuA. Mezhdunarodnye soglasheniya ob izbezhanii dvoynogo nalogooblozheniya: effektivnost pravovogo regulirovaniya [International conventions on avoidance of double taxation: effectiveness of legal regulation]. The Rule of Law State: Theory and Practice. 2015;4:140-144. (In Russ.).

8. Kuznetsova GV. Uchastie Rossii v mezhdunarodnom dvizhenii pryamykh investitsiy [Russian participation in the foreign direct investments flows]. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2015;4:39-54. (In Russ.).

9. Motala M. Nalogovyy suverenitet i zashchita investorov: pochemu predlagaemyy globalnyy minimalnyy nalog ne polozhit konets korporativnomu nalogovomu arbitrazhu [Tax Sovereignty and Investor Protection: Why the Proposed Global Minimum Tax Is not the Final Frontier for Corporate Tax Arbitrage]. International Organisations Research Journal. 2021;2:99-131. (In Russ.).

10. Sargsyan LM. Struktura mezhdunarodnoy sistemy regulirovaniya ofshornykh zon: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Structure of the international anti-offshore regulation system: current state and prospects]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics. 2016;2:31-54. (In Russ.).

11. Sarkisov AK. Novye mezhdunarodnye podkhody k otsenke preimushchestv i nedostatkov «fenomena ofshornykh zon» v tselyakh obespecheniya finansovoy bezopasnosti gosudarstv [New aspects of international assessment «of the phenomenon of offshore zones» on investment and tax advantages, and as the threat to the financial security of states]. International Cooperation of the Eurasian States: Politics, Economics, Law. 2015;4:82-91. (In Russ.).

12. Starostina MI. Offshornyy biznes v sovremennom mire [Offshore business in the modern world]. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin. 2014;6:65-80. (In Russ.).

13. Heifets BA. Globalnaya deofshorizatsiya 4.0 [Global Deoffshorization 4.0]. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022;2:76-92. (In Russ.).

14. Heifets BA. Deofshorizatsiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki: vozmozhnosti i predely [Deoffshorization of the Russian economy: opportunities and limits]. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.)