Genesis of Harm and Losses in Civil Law Doctrine. The Factor of European Science

The works of the first Russian jurists on the problem of compensation for damages in civil law are not sufficiently used in scientific works on this topic. This article can fill in the gaps and be of interest to specialists in this field of research. The author has studied and compared the main works on civil law compensation published before the revolution of 1917. It was found that the science of civil law has moved away from the consideration of universal claims for damages as a remedy and focused on the interpretation of damages as a sanction for an offense. Modern authors repeat the four-level structure of consideration of compensation cases adopted and developed in the Soviet period and the influence of the following conditions: illegality, causality, guilt, proven material damage, lost profit. The author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to return to the ideas that existed before the Russian Revolution and use them to improve the existing theory of compensation for damages and losses.

Russian pre-Soviet civil law initially proceeded from the concept of responsibility only for behavior, since the category of «illegal actions» was introduced in Article 684 of the Code of Laws of the Russian Empire. Due to the developing industry, separate laws provided for payment as the equivalent of property losses for any material damage from dangerous activities, that is, for the materialized risk. In the Draft civil code of the Russian Empire, branched norms on responsibility for lawful actions appeared. A proper scientific generalization of this approach and phenomenon has not yet been made. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation has a norm on compensation for damage due to lawful actions, when it is specified in the law, but not on recovery of damages.

1. Agarkov MM. Vina poterpevshego v obyazatelstvakh iz prichineniya vreda: obzor praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR [The victim’s fault in liabilities arising from causing harm: Judicial review of the Supreme Court of the USSR]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1940;3:70-79. (In Russ.).

2. Antimonov BS. Znachenie viny poterpevshego pri grazhdanskom pravonarushenii [The meaning of the victim’s fault in a civil offense]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat Publ.; 1950. (In Russ.).

3. Vinaver MM. Grazhdanskaya khronika [Civil chronicle]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 1913;3:100-120. (In Russ.).

4. Zmirlov KP. Voznagrazhdenie za vred i ubytki vsledstvie smerti ili povrezhdeniya zdorovya, prichinennykh zheleznodorozhnymi i parokhodnymi predpriyatiyami, po resheniyam Pravitelstvuyushchego senata [Remuneration for damage and losses due to death or damage to health caused by railway and steamship enterprises, according to the decisions of the Governing Senate]. St. Petersburg: Senat Publishing House; 1908. (In Russ.).

5. Domanzho VP. Vopros ob otvetstvennosti za vred, prichinennyy pri osushchestvlenii prava, v proekte nashego grazhdanskogo ulozheniya [The issue of liability for harm caused in the exercise of the right under the draft civil code. Collection of Articles on Civil and Commercial Law. In memory of Professor Gabriel Feliksovich Shershenevich]. Moscow: Statute Publ.; 2005. (In Russ.).

6. Tyutryumov IM. Zakony grazhdanskie s razyasneniyami Pravitelstvuyushchego Senata i kommentariyami russkikh yuristov [Civil laws with explanations of the Governing Senate and comments of Russian lawyers]. Book 2. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).

7. Ioffe OS. Obyazatelstvennoe pravo [The law of obligations]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1975. (In Russ.).

8. Krivtsov AS. Obshchee uchenie ob ubytkakh [The general doctrine of losses]. Yuryev: Mattisen Publishing House; 1902. (In Russ.).

9. Meyer DI. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo: v 2 ch. [Russian Civil Law: in 2 parts]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

10. Muromtsev SA. Grazhdanskoe pravo Drevnego Rima [Civil Law of Ancient Rome]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

11. Pakhman SV. O sovremennom dvizhenii v nauke prava [The modern movement in the science of law]. St. Petersburg: Goverining Senat Publishing House; 1882. (In Russ.).

12. Pirvitz EE. Znachenie viny, sluchaya i nepreodolimoy sily v grazhdanskom prave [The meaning of fault, chance and force majeure in civil law]. Journal of the Ministry of Justice. St. Petersburg: Governing Senate Publishing House; 1895. (In Russ.).

13. Pobedonostsev KP. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava: v 3 ch. Ch. 1: Dogovory i obyazatelstva [Course of civil law: in 3 parts. Part 3: Contracts and obligations]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

14. Pokrovskiy IA. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [The main problems of civil law]. Petrograd: Pravo Publ.; 1917. (In Russ.).

15. Sadikov ON. Ubytki v grazhdanskom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Losses in the civil law of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.).

16. Sobchak AA. O nekotorykh spornykh voprosakh obshchey teorii pravovoy otvetstvennosti [On some controversial issues of the general theory of legal responsibility]. Pravovedenie. 1968;1:49-57. (In Russ.).

17. Shershenevich GF. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava: v 2 t. [Textbook of Russian civil law: in 2 vols]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2005. (In Russ.).

18. Yablochkov TM. Vliyanie viny poterpevshego na razmer vozmeshchaemykh emu ubytkov: T. 1: Chast teoreticheskaya [The impact of the victim’s fault on the amount of damages reimbursed to him: Vol. 1: Theoretical part]. Yaroslavl; 1910. (In Russ.).