Some Issues on Forensics Digitalization
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.196.3.100-109
Abstract
Amid forensics digitalization, an extremely urgent issue is to find a reasonable balance between private and public interests, between preserving the secrecy of correspondence, privacy, etc., guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the availability for obtaining information remotely without the user knowing about it, intercepting information transmitted over computer networks, and studying the memory of electronic devices. Illegal actions with electronic digital information can cause serious and irreversible consequences associated not only with property damage, but also with physical harm to people. The peculiarities of high-tech crimes are their high latency and the constant growth of their number. We should note that the scale of cybercrime has changed. The possibility that «cyber attacks» will be automated reduces the requirements for the qualification of the violator and increases the number of crimes. The current situation necessitates a comprehensive study of not only the investigation of crimes in the field of computer information, but also the digitalization of forensics in general. The technological progress of the 21st century in the field of cyberspace and electronic document management, the specifics of electronic information and methods of its seizure, production tactics persistently require the expansion of forensics objects, as well as the range of investigative actions regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. However, such an expansion of the range of investigative actions should be approached very carefully.
The methodological basis of the study was: dialectical method as a general scientific method of cognition; general scientific and private scientific methods of theoretical and empirical cognition (features of the reflection of digital information in the information environment): description; analysis and synthesis of criminologists’ points of view; comparative legal method and method of system research.
About the Authors
A. B. SmushkinRussian Federation
Aleksandr B. Smushkin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Criminalistics
Chernyshevskogo, d. 104, Saratov, 410028
M. M. Menzhega
Russian Federation
Mikhail M. Menzhega, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Criminalistics
Chernyshevskogo, d. 104, Saratov, 410028
References
1. Bazhenov SV. Operativno-rozysknoe meropriyatie «Poluchenie kompyuternoy informatsii» [Operational search event «Obtaining computer information»]. Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii [Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia]. 2017;2. (In Russ.).
2. Krasnova LB. Ispolzovanie osobennostey informatsionnykh tekhnologiy dlya ustanovleniya i proverki alibi [Using information technology features to establish and verify an alibi]. Voronezhskie kriminalisticheskie chteniya: sbornik nauch. trudov [Voronezh forensic readings: Collection of scientific works]. 2014;16. (In Russ.).
3. Kryukova TS. Nekotorye voprosy izyatiya elektronnykh nositeley informatsii v khode proizvodstva sledstvennykh deystviy: analiz sudebnoy praktiki [Some issues of electronic data storage seizure in the course of investigative actions: Analysis of judicial practice]. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika [Legal Order: History, Theory, Practice]. 2016;4:61-63. (In Russ.).
4. Kuchin OS. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya mirovoy kriminalistiki [On some trends in the development of world criminology]. In: Davydiv SI, Polyakov VV, editors. Problemy borby s prestupnostyu v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii: teoriya i praktika: sbornik statey XVIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Ugolovno-protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya na Altae [Problems of combating crime in the context of digitalization: Theory and practice. Proceedings of 18th International Scientific and Practical Conference «Criminal procedure and criminalistic readings in Altay»]. Issue 16. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Altai State University. Barnaul: Altai University Publishing House; 2020. (In Russ.).
5. Pobedkin AV. Ugolovno-protsessualnoe zakonodatelstvo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: otsifrovat ili odukhotvorit? [Criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation: Digitize or spiritualize?]. In: Kriminalistika v usloviyakh razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva (59‑e ezhegodnye kriminalisticheskie chteniya): sbornik statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Criminalistics in the context of the development of the Information Society (59th Annual Forensic Readings). Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference]. Moscow: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii Publ.; 2018. Pp. 217–224. (In Russ.).
6. Sergeev MS. Elektronnaya proverka soobshcheniy o prestuplenii [Electronic verification of crime reports]. In: Kuchin OS, editor. Elektronnye nositeli informatsii v kriminalistike: materialy kruglogo stola [Electronic media in criminalistics: Proceedings of the roundtable]. Moscow State University, Moscow, May 13, 2016. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ.; 2016. P. 65. (In Russ.).
7. Smushkin AB. K voprosu ob elektronnykh sledstvennykh deystviyakh [On the issue of electronic investigative activities]. Zakonodatelstvo [Legislation]. 2019;11. (In Russ.).
8. Timoshenko EA. Kompyuternaya forenzika i ee rol v protsesse raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy v usloviyakh globalnoy tsifrovizatsii [Computer forensics and its role in the process of solving and investigating crimes in the context of global digitalization]. Vestnik studencheskogo nauchnogo obshchestva GOU VPO «Donetskiy natsionalnyy universitet» [Bulletin of the Student Scientific Society of Donetsk National University]. 2022;4(14‑2):178-182. (In Russ.).
9. Tropina TL. Kiberprestupnost: ponyatie, sostoyanie, ugolovno-pravovye mery borby: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Cybercrime: Concept, state, criminal law measures of struggle. Author’s abstract of Cand. Sci. (Law) Thesis]. Vladivostok; 2007. (In Russ.).
10. Fedotov NN. Forenzika — kompyuternaya kriminalistika [Forensics — computer criminalistics]. Moscow: Yuridicheskiy Mir; 2007. (In Russ.).
11. Shurukhnov NG. Etapy tsifrovizatsii neposredstvennogo proizvodstva sledstvennykh i inykh protsessualnykh deystviy [Stages of digitalization of direct production of investigative and other procedural actions]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2018;436. (In Russ.).
12. Yakovlev AN. Obshchedostupnaya tsifrovaya informatsiya v raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy [Publicly available digital information in the disclosure and investigation of crimes]. In: Prestupnost v sfere informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnykh tekhnologiy: problemy preduprezhdeniya, raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy: sbornik materialov vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Voronezh, 24–25 aprelya 2014 g.) [Crime in the field of information and telecommunication technologies: Problems of prevention, disclosure and investigation of crimes. Proceedings the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Voronezh, April 24–25, 2014)]. Voronezh: Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ.; 2014. Pp. 28–32. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Smushkin A.B., Menzhega M.M. Some Issues on Forensics Digitalization. Lex Russica. 2023;76(3):100-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.196.3.100-109