Crime Prevention System in the USSR: A Relic of the Past or a Model of the Future?

The current geopolitical situation in the world dictates the need to find new approaches in the field of countering global external and internal risks. Often such a search leads to the expediency of returning to social practices that have already been implemented and have proven their viability: if not a complete reverse, then the use of the most useful social tools that are maximally applicable in domestic conditions. Crime has always been one of the main internal threats to national security. In this regard, a retrospective study of the means and methods used to counter crime is not only interesting, but also practically useful. The experience of legal regulation and practical implementation of the crime prevention system in the USSR has both advantages and disadvantages. The identification of positive aspects, the identification of effective tools that could be used in the process of improving the currently existing crime prevention system in Russia, could make it possible to build the most effective promising model of counter-criminal activity at the present stage. The appeal to the crime prevention system in the USSR is due to the special significance of this period of national statehood, marked by significant historical events that demonstrated the role of the state in ensuring security, respect for human and civil rights and freedoms, including those who violated the law. During the Soviet period, special attention was given to the penitentiary and post-penitentiary period of the re-socialization of convicts, the provision of correctional and educational influence on them, a real system of preventing recidivism was built. Modern studies of such experience are actualized in connection with the organization of the probation system in the Russian Federation as a set of measures, functions and powers of the relevant entities assisting convicts who find themselves in a difficult life situation, which is ultimately aimed at preventing crimes.

1. Bezhentsev AA. Retrospektiva profilaktiki pravonarusheniy nesovershennoletnikh v Sovetskom Soyuze [Retrospective of juvenile delinquency prevention in the Soviet Union]. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Vestnik of Siberian Law Institute of the MIA of Russia]. 2019;3(36):119-124. (In Russ.).

2. Gurnitskiy AV. Bednost kak kriminogennyy faktor [Poverty as a criminogenic factor]. Nauchnyy portal MVD RF [Scientific portal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation]. 2014;3:42-46. (In Russ.).

3. Detkov MG. Soderzhanie penitentsiarnoy politiki rossiyskogo gosudarstva i ee realizatsiya v sisteme ispolneniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody v period 1917–1930-kh godov[The content of the penitentiary policy of the Russian state and its implementation in the system of execution of criminal punishment in the form of imprisonment in the period of the 1917–1930s]. Moscow; 1992. (In Russ.).

4. Zhurbin RV. Preduprezhdenie prestupnosti na sovremennom etape razvitiya obshchestva: ponyatie, soderzhanie, printsipy [Crime prevention at the present stage of society development: Concept, content, principles]. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Journal of Criminology]. 2016;4:627-637. (In Russ.).

5. Kleimenov MP, Kondratiev AV, Seibol EM. Profilaktika pravonarusheniy: istoricheskiy ocherk [Prevention of offenses: A historical essay]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo» [Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law»]. 2020;17(1):108-119. (In Russ.).

6. Korobeev AI. Prestupnost v sovremennoy Rossii kak vnutrenniy vyzov razvitiyu gosudarstva [Crime in modern Russia as an internal challenge to the development of the state]. Zhurnal prikladnykh issledovaniy [Journal of Applied Research]. 2020;3:33-39. (In Russ.).

7. Korobeev AI. Ugolovnaya politika sovremennoy Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy [Criminal policy of modern Russia: Status and prospects]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2016;3(35):247-249. (In Russ.).

8. Kosoplechev N, Grigoryan V, Fedulov I. Sistema mer preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti: deyatelnost gosudarstvennykh organov i obshchestvennykh organizatsiy [The system of crime prevention measures: The activities of state bodies and public organizations]. Moscow; 1988. (In Russ.).

9. Levakova EN. Organizatsiya preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy oblastnymi gosudarstvennymi organami i obshchestvennymi organizatsiyami [Organization of crime prevention by regional state bodies and public organizations]. Moscow; 1989. (In Russ.).

10. Rossinskiy SB. UPK RSFSR 1922 goda — pervyy kodifitsirovannyy istochnik sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessualnogo prava (k 100-letiyu s momenta prinyatiya) [The Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR of 1922: The first codified source of Soviet criminal procedure law (to the 100th anniversary of its adoption)]. Kriminalistika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow]. 2022;3(23):229-238. (In Russ.).

11. Sinyukova TN. Obshchestvennye organizatsii SSSR v 20–40‑e gody: ikh istoriko-pravovaya rol [Public organizations of the USSR in the 20-40s: Their historical and legal role]. Izvestiya RGPU imeni I. Gertsena [Izvestiya RSPU named after A.I. Herzen]. 2015;174:95-100. (In Russ.).

12. Tarasova MI, Smirnov IS. Istoriya sozdaniya obshchestvennykh nablyudatelnykh komissiy [The history of the creation of public supervisory commissions]. Istoriya i sovremennoe mirovozzrenie [History and modern worldview]. 2020;3(2):71-76. (In Russ.).

13. Shestakov DA. Semeynaya kriminologiya. Semya — konflikt — prestuplenie [Family criminology. Family — conflict — crime]. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University; 1996. (In Russ.).

14. Jantsen ID. Semeyno-brachnye otnosheniya v SSSR v 1920–1930‑e gody: ot defamilizatsii k klassicheskoy sovetskoy seme [Family and marriage relations in the USSR in the 1920s–1930s: from defamilization to the classical Soviet family]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences]. 2019;4‑2:29-31. (In Russ.).