The Concept and Types of Liability in Russian Civil Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.201.8.009-021
Abstract
The paper describes the results of the study of the concept of liability under the civil law of Russia as it is reflected in the current legislation of the Russian Federation. The authors proceed from the fact that such an approach to the study of civil law phenomena, including liability, is constructive, since the phenomena under examination are investigated first in the context of de lege lata, and then in the context of de lege ferenda. Research in the aspect of de lege lata involves identification of the legislator’s understanding of the content of the category of liability under civil law that is expressed in the current civil legislation. It is emphasized that the interpretation of liability in the aspect of de lege lata can be used in the interpretation and application of current legislation. The understanding of liability expressed in the legislation should be mainly used in the interpretation of the truth before the purely theoretically cognizable essence of responsibility under civil law, and the theoretical essence of responsibility should be taken into account when making amendments and additions to the current legislation. The paper critically assesses the tendency to cumulate liability measures by introducing such new types of liability as fair compensation (Article 65.2 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) and compensation for damage (Article 16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). The authors criticize the attempts of the judiciary to legalize such a type of liability as compensation for causing reputational damage to legal entities through its own practice (and not through the legislative process). The authors conclude that it is possible to distinguish between liability measures and other civil law methods provided for by the current legislation of the Russian Federation, which does not exclude the need for its further improvement both in terms of the development of general provisions and in relation to the regulation of individual civil liability measures
Keywords
About the Authors
S. V. OchkurenkoRussian Federation
Sergey V. Ochkurenko - Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Financial and Banking Law, Law Institute
ul. Universitetskaya, d. 33, Sevastopol, 299053
V. G. Rotan
Russian Federation
Vladimir G. Rotan - Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Law Institute
ul. Universitetskaya, d. 33, Sevastopol, 299053
References
1. Belov VA. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya chast. Vvedenie v grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law. The general part. Introduction to Civil Law]. Moscow: Yurayt Publ.; 2011. (In Russ.).
2. Braginsky MI, Vitryansky VV. Dogovornoe pravo. Obshchie polozheniya [Contract law. General provisions]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).
3. Vaskovsky EV. Tsivilisticheskaya metodologiya. Uchenie o tolkovanii i primenenii grazhdanskikh zakonov [Civilistic methodology. The doctrine of the interpretation and application of civil laws]. Moscow: Tsentr YurInfoR Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.).
4. Gavrilov EV. Pravovye pozitsii Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka o kompensatsii vreda, ne poddayushchegosya polnomu denezhnomu ischisleniyu, prichinennogo umaleniem delovoy reputatsii organizatsii [The Legal Positions of the European Court of Human Rights on Compensation for the Damage, not Susceptible to Precise Monetary Calculation, Caused by Belittling of Business Reputation of the Organizations]. Rossijskaja justitsija. 2017;6:64-67. (In Russ.).
5. Sukhanov EA (ed.). Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 4 t. T. 1: Obshchaya chast [Civil Law: Textbook in 4 vols. General Part]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).
6. Karapetov AG (ed.). Dogovornoe i obyazatelstvennoe pravo (obshchaya chast): postateynyy kommentariy k statyam 307–453 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Contract and Obligation law (general part): Article-by-article commentary on Articles 307–453 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
7. Iering R. Izbrannye trudy: v 2 t. [Selected works: in 2 vols]. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: Law Center-Press Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).
8. Ioffe OS. Izbrannye trudy: v 4 t. T. 1: Pravootnoshenie po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. Otvetstvennost po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. [Selected works: in 4 vols. Vol. 1: Legal relations under Soviet Civil law. Responsibility under Soviet civil law]. St. Petersburg: Law Center-Press Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).
9. Ispolinov AS, Sidorenko MA. Voprosy vozmeshcheniya ushcherba v Evropeyskom Sude po pravam cheloveka: prisuzhdenie spravedlivoy kompensatsii i zaklyuchenie mirovykh soglasheniy [Issues of Reparation in the European Court of Human Rights: Award of Just Compensation and Conclusion of Friendly Settlements]. Zakon. 2019;6:93-104. (In Russ.).
10. Kuznetsov DA. Funktsii kompensatsii za narushenie prav cheloveka v nadnatsionalnykh i natsionalnykh sudebnykh resheniyakh [Functions of compensation for human rights violations in supranational and national judicial decisions]. International Justice. 2021;1:81-101. (In Russ.).
11. Lenin VI. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [The complete works]. Vol. 44. 5th ed. Moscow: Political Literature Publishing House, 1970. (In Russ.).
12. Monastyrsky YuE. Institut ubytkov v grazhdanskom prave Rossii. Professionalnye faktory effektivnogo primeneniya [Institute of Damages in the civil law of Russia. Professional factors of effective application]. Moscow: Promethei Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).
13. Rotan VG, Sonin OE, Chertkova YuV. Noveyshee uchenie o tolkovanii prava (po materialam grazhdanskogo i drugikh otrasley prava): monografiya [The latest teaching on the interpretation of law (based on the civil and other branches of law): monograph]. Simferopol; 2019. (In Russ.).
14. Karapetov AG (ed.). Osnovnye polozheniya grazhdanskogo prava: postateynyy kommentariy k statyam 1–16.1 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The main provisions of civil law: an article-by-article commentary on Articles 1–16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).
15. Sidorenko MA. O prisuzhdenii spravedlivoy kompensatsii (iz praktiki Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka) [On the award of fair compensation (from the practice of the European Court of Human Rights]. The Rule of Law. 2018;2:210-225. (In Russ.).
16. Tretyakov SV. O doktorskoy dissertatsii V. L. Tolstykh [About V.L. Tolstykh Doctoral Dissertation]. Civil Law Review. 2008;8(1):243-264. (In Russ.).
17. Khokhlov VA. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost za narushenie dogovorov: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. [Civil liability for breach of contracts: Doctoral Dissertation]. Saratov; 1998. (In Russ.).
18. Chernogor NN. O teoreticheskikh problemakh yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [On theoretical problems of legal responsibility]. Journal of Russian Law. 2006;5:105-109. (In Russ.).
19. Erdelevsky A. O podkhode Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF k zashchite delovoy reputatsii yuridicheskikh lits [On the approach of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to the protection of the business reputation of legal entities]. Business and Law. 2005;4:111-116. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ochkurenko S.V., Rotan V.G. The Concept and Types of Liability in Russian Civil Law. Lex Russica. 2023;76(8):9-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.201.8.009-021