Telecommunications Secrecy Violation in the Context of Russian Criminal Law: Current Problems and Prospects for Overcoming Them

The paper is devoted to the controversial issues of criminal liability for violating the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations, postal, telegraph and other messages based on the analysis of Russian legislation, generalization of judicial practice and experience of foreign countries. The author explains the concept and content of communication secrecy, examines its correlation with other types of legally protected information, provides a criminal legal assessment of the dissemination of mutual correspondence without the consent of one of the addressees, and considers a sign of insignificance of the act in relation to encroachments on constitutional human rights. Telecommunications secrecy is defined as any information transmitted using wired, radio, optical or other electromagnetic systems, to which access is restricted in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, other regulatory legal and local acts. It is proposed to consolidate the provision that only a person who is not the addressee of negotiations, correspondence and other messages can bear criminal responsibility for violating the secrecy of communication. The rules of qualification of the violation of the secrecy of communication are formulated in conjunction with the crimes in the field of computer information, as well as with the illegal receipt and disclosure of information constituting a trade secret. It is noted that Part 2 of Article 138 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be supplemented with the provision listing qualifying signs of the use of information and telecommunication networks by a person and about unauthorized access to the critical infrastructure of the Russian Federation. The author criticizes the refusal of the courts to recognize the violation of the secrecy of communication as an insignificant act only because of the special significance of the object of criminal law protection. A rule is established to eliminate competing criminal law norms concerning exemption from liability for violating the secrecy of communication by applying the article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which is the most favourable for the person who committed the crime. In conclusion, the author proposes a new version of the article of the criminal law on violation of the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations and other telecommunication messages that provides for the composition of a crime with administrative prejudice.

1. Glava MVD Britanii Patel zayavila prankeram o gotovnosti pomogat neonatsistam s Ukrainy [British Interior Minister Patel told prankers about her readiness to help neo-Nazis from Ukraine]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 24 March 2023. № 8711. (In Russ.).

2. Izmozik VS. «Chernye kabinety»: istoriya rossiyskoy perlyustratsii, XVIII — nachalo XX veka [«Black offices»: the history of Russian perlustration, 18th — early 20th century: monograph]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2015.

3. Izotova AN. Pravovoe regulirovanie tayny svyazi v informatsionnom obshchestve [Legal regulation of communication secrecy in the information society]. RUDN Journal of Law. 2020;24(4):985-1004. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-4-985-1004. (In Russ.).

4. Izotova AN. Transformatsiya kruga subektov tayny svyazi: vliyanie tsifrovizatsii [Transformation of the circle of subjects of the secrecy of communication: the impact of digitalization]. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2022;17(3):40-52. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.136.3.040-052. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

5. Kufleva VN, Kubrak VS. Problemy realizatsii prava na taynu perepiski v messendzherakh: teoreticheskiy i komparativistskiy aspekty [Problems of realization of the right to secrecy of correspondence in messengers: theoretical and comparative aspects]. Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social sciences. 2018;10:153-157. (In Russ.).

6. Marinov AA, Usov EG, Zagainov VV. Protivodeystvie prestupleniyam, svyazannym s narusheniem tayny telefonnykh peregovorov [Countering crimes related to the violation of telephone conversation secrecy]. The Herald of the Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Science. 2021;4:69-75. (In Russ.).

7. Meshcheryakova MA. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na taynu kommunikatsii: ponyatie i soderzhanie [Constitutional right to privacy of communication: concept and content]. Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2020;3(53):127-127. (In Russ.).

8. Public Relations Department of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Is it possible to announce mutual correspondence? Available at: https://minjust.uz/ru/press-center/news/99045/?print=Y.

9. Pirbudagova DS, Sadikova IS. Pravo na taynu perepiski, telefonnykh peregovorov, pochtovykh, telegrafnykh i inykh soobshcheniy: problemy realizatsii [The right to secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations, postal, telegraphic and other messages: problems of implementation]. Law Herald of Dagestan State University. 2011;1:33-35. (In Russ.).

10. Pribytkova IV. Zashchita chesti i dostoinstva obvinyaemogo, tayny perepiski, telefonnykh peregovorov, soobshcheniy [Protection of the honor and dignity of the accused, the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations, messages]. Bulletin of Science and Education. 2018;17(53):101-104. (In Russ.).

11. Rossiyskie prankery opublikovali polnoe video razgovora s ministrom oborony Velikobritanii [Russian prankers have published a full video of a conversation with the British Defense Minister]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 24 March 2022. № 8711. (In Russ.).

12. Prosecutor’s Office of the Ryazan region. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie tayny perepiski, telefonnykh peregovorov, pochtovykh, telegrafnykh i inykh soobshcheniy [Criminal liability for violation of the secrecy of correspondence, telephone conversations, postal, telegraphic and other messages]. Available at: https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/web/proc_62/activity/legal-education/explain?item=48799093. (In Russ.).

13. Cherkasov VS. Pochemu v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse neobkhodimo sovershenstvovat garantii zashchity tayny «elektronnykh kommunikatsiy»? [Why is necessary to improve the guarantees of «electronic communications» secrecy protection in the Russian criminal proceeding law?]. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2021;4:129-133. (In Russ.).

14. Fake news v epokhu globalizatsii [Fake news in the era of globalization]. Roscongress Information and Analytical system. Available at: https://roscongress.org/sessions/spief-fake-news-v-epokhu-globalizatsii/translation/. (In Russ.).