Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Ma Siu Method as a Principle of the Socialist Judicial System with Chinese Specifics: History and Modern Understanding

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.202.9.133-145

Abstract

A striking feature of modern Chinese society is the preservation and development in new conditions of important elements of its traditional legal culture. The paper analyzes one of these elements. It takes its name from the statesman and party leader Ma Siu (1899–1962) and represents a set of basic methods and principles of the judicial system of the country, which judges should be guided by in their professional activities. The author believes that the most important direction of the development of the Ma Siu method in modern conditions is the openness and accessibility of the judiciary, which is manifested in the large-scale introduction of electronic justice into the country’s legal system in 2013. The undoubted leadership of China in this area does not weaken, according to the author, the attention of the authorities to improving the key principles of the Ma Siu method, the essence of which are the spiritual and moral foundations of «justice for the people». These foundations are manifested in the consolidation of the rule of law, the development of the institution of people’s assessors, as well as the widespread introduction of socialist values into the judicial system of the country. The main among these values is considered to be public, state and political control over the activities of the courts, without which justice breaks away from the people and turns into fiction, and the principles of separation of powers and independence of the judiciary are the result of misconceptions of Western philosophical and socio-political thought. The author’s analysis of the laws of the People’s Republic of China adopted in recent years, as well as published scientific articles, comments and statements by official authorities, allow us to conclude that, although no law of the People’s Republic of China directly states this, the main role in controlling the judiciary, of course, belongs to the Communist Party of China, confirming the continuity this «beautiful folk judicial tradition», which arose during the period of Ma Siu’s activity.

About the Author

A. V. Danshin
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Danshin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Law Institute

Krasnaya ul., d. 6, Kemerovo, 650000



References

1. An Zihui. Sovershenstvovanie narodnoy yuridicheskoy sistemy Kitaya po obraztsu reform yuridicheskoy sistemy Rossii [Improvement of the people’s legal system of China on the model of reforms of the legal system of Russia]. In: Sukhodolov AP, Ozernikova TG, editors. Razvitie rossiysko-kitayskikh otnosheniy: novaya mezhdunarodnaya realnost: materialy Vtoroy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 70-letiyu Pobedy vo Vtoroy mirovoy voyne: v 2 ch. [The development of Russian-Chinese relations: A new international reality. Proccedings of the Second International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Victory in World War II: in 2 parts]. Irkutsk; 2016. Pp. 9–17. (In Russ.).

2. Gracheva YuV, Korobeev AI, Malikov SV, Chuchaev AI. Ugolovno-pravovye riski v sfere tsifrovykh tekhnologiy: problemy i predlozheniya [Criminal and Legal Risks in the Field of Digital Technologies: Problems and Suggestions]. Lex Russica. 2020;73(1):145-159. (In Russ.).

3. Nepeyvoda N. Poetizm realizatsii printsipa zakonnosti v Den Konstitutsii KNR [Poetics of the implementation of the principle of legality on the Day of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China]. Available from: https://zakon.ru/blog/2019/12/08/poetizm_realizacii_principa_zakonnosti_v_den_konstitucii_knr. (In Russ.).

4. Nepeyvoda N. Pravosudie na konchikakh paltsev: opyt KNR [Justice at your fingertips: The experience of the PRC]. Available from: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/05/02/pravosudie_na_konchikah_palcev_opyt_knr_83633. (In Russ.).

5. Xi Jinping. Vysoko nesya velikoe znamya sotsializma s kitayskoy spetsifikoy [Carrying high the great banner of Socialism with Chinese specifics]. (Oct. 16, 2022). Available from: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/rus/zxxx/202210/t20221026_10792071.html. (In Russ.).

6. Spesivov NV. Ot fantasticheskikh teoriy k obektivnoy realnosti: est li budushchee u iskusstvennogo intellekta i prediktivnykh tekhnologiy pri otpravlenii pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam? [From Fantastic Theories to Objective Reality: Is there Future for Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Technologies in Administration of Criminal Justice?]. Lex Russica. 2023;76(2):81-90. (In Russ.).

7. Troshchinsky PV, Gudoshnikov LM. Sudebnaya sistema KNR [The judicial system of the People’s Republic of China]. In: Vinogradov AV, editor. Sovremennoe kitayskoe gosudarstvo [The Modern Chinese State]. Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences. T. 1: Osnovnye instituty gosudarstvennoy vlasti i upravleniya [Vol. 1. The main institutions of state power and governance]. Moscow: RAS Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

8. Fokov AP. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respublike: tsifrovaya realnost i organizatsiya «umnogo suda» [Electronic justice in the People’s Republic of China: Digital reality and the organization of a «smart court»]. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatelstvo; pravo i upravlenie [Science and education: Economy and economics; entrepreneurship; law and management]. 2021;8(135):119-124. (In Russ.).

9. Huang PhC, Bernhardt K, editors. The History and Theory of Legal Practice in China: Toward a Historical-Social Jurisprudence. Los Angeles — Leiden (Netherlands) — Boston: Brill; 2014.

10. Pan Huaiping. Prodolzhayte prekrasnye traditsii narodnogo pravosudiya v pogranichnom rayone Shensi-Gansu-Nankin, priderzhivaytes i razvivayte sotsialisticheskuyu sudebnuyu sistemu s kitayskoy spetsifikoy [Continue the wonderful traditions of people’s justice in the Shaanxi-Gansu-Nanjing border region, adhere to and develop a socialist judicial system with Chinese specifics]. Narodnoe pravovoe gosudarstv [The people’s legal state]. No. 127. May 2022. [潘怀平:发扬陕甘宁边区人民司法优良传统坚持和发展中国特色社会主义司法制度.来源: «人民法治»杂志第127期]. Available from: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/MoQ3qj17RjUrxHd86XEUPg.

11. He Xiaorong. Vnutrenniy dukh sudebnykh metodov Ma Siu i ego tsennost v nashe vremya [Inner spirit judicial methods of MA SIU and its value in our time. 贺小荣: "马锡五审判方式" 的内在精神及其时代价值]. Available from: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4MjY4MzM1NA==&mid=2649867889&idx=1&sn=7d8f9d3839ffee7e00dcbaa7692481f8&chksm=878492c4b0f31bd2fc9b0401f21d08b13f6f2ba9344c9cdc8d82bc64d96b8-93bd7b95519404c&scene=27.

12. Zhang Mingying. «Metod Ma Siu». Ne ostavlyayte massy ni na mgnovene [The Ma Siu Method. Don’t leave the masses even for a moment. 张明明: "马锡五审判方式"-"刻也不离开""]. Available from: https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210719A02KPM00.

13. Zheng Zhong. Nasledovat i razvivat sudebnye metody Ma Siu v novuyu epokhu [To inherit and develop the judicial methods of Ma Siu in the new era. 郑重:在新新新时和"马马方式]. Available from: https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-217661.html.


Review

For citations:


Danshin A.V. Ma Siu Method as a Principle of the Socialist Judicial System with Chinese Specifics: History and Modern Understanding. Lex Russica. 2023;76(9):133-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.202.9.133-145

Views: 242


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)