Implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement in the Legal Systems of the EAEU Member States
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.206.1.103-118
Abstract
The Paris Climate Agreement provides for the acceptance by the participating States of obligations, which this treaty enshrines as «nationally determined contributions» (NDC). The goal of these commitments is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and keep global temperature increases well below 2°C compared to preindustrial levels. This mechanism has a number of legal features: first, each state establishes NDC independently, reports them to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), acting as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, and registers them with the Secretariat. From this moment, a new international legal obligation of the state to implement the NDC arises. Secondly, it can be changed only in the direction of greater «ambition», that is, by increasing targets for limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Thirdly, the Paris Agreement does not require the coordination of national measures with the rest of the parties to the treaty. Each participant in the Paris Agreement represents an NDC, which determines the scope of its own obligations without the participation of other states, unlike the mechanism provided for in the GATT and GATS, where WTO member states are required to coordinate their national measures with the rest of the participants (Goods schedule / Services schedule). Fourthly, the monitoring mechanism provides for the first stage of summing up in 2023, when an assessment of the progress towards achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement will be given.
A comparative analysis of the NDC of the EAEU member states, all of which are parties to the Paris Agreement, allows us to generalize. The Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation announced the achievement of carbon neutrality by 2060, the rest of the states — by 2050. Some states (the Republic of Belarus, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Republic of Kazakhstan) have set two targets for the implementation of NDC: conditional (achievement of the indicator with international financial support and access to modern technologies) and unconditional (achievement of the indicator at own expense). The level of development of the legal framework for the implementation of the NDC of the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Belarus and the Kyrgyz Republic is inferior to the level of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of limiting greenhouse gas emissions, turnover of carbon units and taxation of carbon emissions (introduction of a carbon tax). At the EAEU level, the member states have adopted a roadmap on the climate agenda, and much work remains to be done to develop a regulatory framework.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. M. LifshitsRussian Federation
Ilya M. Lifshits, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of International Law
32, building 1, Levoberezhnaya St., Moscow 125445
A. S. Smbatyan
Russian Federation
Anait S. Smbatyan, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of International Law
32, building 1, Levoberezhnaya St., Moscow 125445
M. R. Salia
Russian Federation
Marianna R. Salia, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of International Law
32, building 1, Levoberezhnaya St., Moscow 125445
References
1. Dobson NL. Extraterritoriality and Climate Change Jurisdiction Exploring EU Climate Protection under International Law. Hurt; 2021.
2. Laevskaya EV. Legal support for the «green» economy principles implementation in the Republic of Belarus. Minsk: Chetyre chetverti Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
3. Makarov IA. Bridging the Gaps in the Polycentric Climate Change Regime. In: Grigiryev LM, Pabst A, editors. Global Governance in Transformation Challenges for International Cooperation. Springer; 2020.
4. Mayer B. Climate Change Mitigation as an Obligation under Customary International Law. Yale Journal of International Law. 2023;48(1):105-151.
5. Mayer B. Transparency under the Paris Rulebook: An Enhanced Transparency Framework? Climate Law. 2019;9(1):40-64.
6. Migaleva TE, Podbiralina GV, Razumnova LL. Convergence of the positions of the EAEU Member States on the climate agenda and carbon regulation. Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics. 2022;2(40):41-50. (In Russ.).
7. Ostrom E. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
8. Rajamani L. The 2015 Paris Agreement: Interplay between Hard, Soft and Non-Obligations. Journal of Environmental Law. 2016;28:337-358.
9. Sitnikov S. An experiment on greenhouse gas emissions quotas has begun in Russia. Available from: https://empp.ru/assets/files/empp-alert-sakhalin.pdf [cited 2023 September 050]. (In Russ.).
10. Smbatyan AS, Saliya MR. The climate agenda in the activities of the EAEU and its member States. International environmental law. Proceedings of the 28th round table The International Congress «Blishchenkov readings». Moscow, June 6, 2022 = International Environmental Law: Proceedings of the Roundtables Discussion of the XVII Blischenko Congress. Moscow, 6 June 2022. Abashidze AKh, Solntsev AM, editors. Moscow: RUDN Publ.; 2010. Pp. 148–156. (In Russ.).
11. Sokolova NA. Climate Change: International Legal Regulation Development. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2021;16(12):177-184. (In Russ.).
12. Solntsev AM. Climate change: an international legal dimension. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. 2018;1:60-78. (In Russ.).
13. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Commentaries. Comp. by Talalaev AN (commentaries); Zakharova NV, editor (preface). Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Lifshits I.M., Smbatyan A.S., Salia M.R. Implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement in the Legal Systems of the EAEU Member States. Lex Russica. 2024;77(1):103-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.206.1.103-118