The Contribution of the History of Concepts to the Critical Understanding of the State

The paper develops the problems of critical understanding of the phenomenon of the state. The author comprehends the contribution of the German history of concepts (Begriffsgeschichte) and the British Conceptual History to the critical understanding of the emergence of the state as a concept and social phenomenon in Modern times. Representatives of these lines of thought trace the appearance of the English State and the French État to the 17th century, the German Staat to the second half of the 18th century. Russian followers of these traditions explore the historical and ideological context of the emergence of the state in the 15th– 18th centuries. The researchers emphasize that in Germany the concept of the state is formed two centuries later than that in France, but it immediately becomes political and subordinates the rest of the meanings of the word, creating a theoretical basis for the development of state studies and public law, while the French état and English state in the meaning of the state have long been used in relation to non-state political and even nonpolitical phenomena. An important contribution of the history of concepts was the search for the ideological and social foundations of modern state legal terms and models — state sovereignty, citizenship, legal and social state, endowed with meaning primarily in the continental tradition. The author continues the study of the problems of critical understanding of the state, which began in the article «Critical Concepts of the State and their Significance for Russian Jurisprudence: Introduction to the Problem» (Lex russica. 2020;6:122-138).

1. Badalyan DA. The concept of the «constitution» in Russia of the 18th–19th centuries: From the resolution of the Sejm and legalization to the topping of the building and the legal order. In: Miller AI, Sdvizhkov DA, Shirle I (eds). «Concepts about Russia»: On the historical semantics of the Imperial period. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2012. Pp. 151–174. (In Russ.).

2. Boldt H, Conze W, Haverkate G, Klippel D, Koselleck R. Staat und Souveränität. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Bd. 6. Red.: R. Koselleck. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 1990. Pp. 1–105.

3. Chetvernin VA, Yakovlev VA. Institutional theory and legal libertarianism. Yearbook of Libertarian Legal Theory. Vol. 2. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ.; 2009. Pp. 217–239. (In Russ.).

4. Collingwood R. The idea of the history. Autobiography. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1980. (In Russ.).

5. Debolsky NN. Civil legal capacity under Russian law until the end of the 17th century. St. Petersburg: Tip. M.M. Stasyulevicha; 1903. (In Russ.).

6. Engels F. The origin of the family, private property and the state: in connection with the research of Lewis G. Morgan. Moscow: Librocom Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

7. Gorobiy AV. The history of concepts by Carl Schmitt and Reinhart Kosellek. Vestnik TvGU. Philosophy Series. 2013;4:159-170. (In Russ.).

8. Kharkhordin OA. The basic concepts of Russian politics. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2011. (In Russ.). Kharkhordin OA. What is a «state»? The Russian term in the European context. The concept of the state in four languages. St. Petersburg: Evrop. un‑t v S.-Peterb. Publ.; 2002. Pp. 152–217. (In Russ.).

9. Kiselev MA. The truth and the law in the second half of the 17th — first quarter of the 18th century: From the monarch-judge to the monarch-legislator. In: Miller AI, Sdvizhkov DA, Shirle I (eds). «Concepts about Russia»: On the historical semantics of the Imperial period. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2012. Pp. 49–65. (In Russ.).

10. Kofanov LL. The system of Roman public law of the era of the Republic and the Principate. Moscow: Indrik Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

11. Koposov NE. The history of concepts yesterday and today. Historical concepts and political ideas in Russia of the 16th–20th centuries. St. Petersburg: Evrop. un‑t v S.-Peterb. Publ.; 2006. Pp. 9–32. (In Russ.).

12. Kosellek R. Introduction. Dictionary of basic historical concepts. Selected articles: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2014. Pp. 23–44. (In Russ.).

13. Kosellek R. On the question of temporal structures in historical development. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2010. Pp. 21–33. (In Russ.).

14. Krom MM. The birth of the «state»: From the history of the Moscow political discourse of the 16th century. In: Historical concepts and political ideas in Russia of the 16th–20th centuries. Vol. 5. St. Petersburg; 2006. Pp. 54–69. (In Russ.).

15. Krom MM. The birth of the Modern State in Russia and Western Europe: A comparative historical perspective. In: The works of the Department of Russian History from ancient times to the 20th century. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Saint-Petersburg University; 2006. Pp. 27–36. (In Russ.).

16. Krom MM. The use of concepts in research on the history of Pre-Petrine Russia: Changing milestones and new landmarks. In: Garreta G, Dyufo G, Pimenova L (eds). How do we write history? Moscow: Rospen Publ.; 2013. Pp. 94–125. (In Russ.).

17. Kuchkin VA. Formation and development of the state territory of the Eastern Slavs in the 9th–13th centuries. Otechestvennaya istoriya. 2003;3:71-80. (In Russ.).

18. Lukin PV. Novgorod Veche in the 13th–15th centuries. Historiographical constructions and data of Hanseatic documents. Disputes about the Novgorod Veche: Interdisciplinary dialogue. Proceedings of the round table. St. Petersburg: Evrop. un‑t v S.-Peterb. Publ.; 2012. Pp. 10–60. (In Russ.).

19. Marasinova EN. The law in Russia of the second half of the 18th century. In: Miller AI, Sdvizhkov DA, Shirle I (eds). «Concepts about Russia»: On the historical semantics of the Imperial period. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2012. Pp. 66–93. (In Russ.).

20. Pavlov AV. The Adventures of the Method: The Cambridge School (of Political Thought) in Contexts. Logos. 2018;4:261-302. (In Russ.).

21. Pocock JGA. The Machiavelli moment. Florence’s political thought and the Atlantic Republican tradition. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

22. Schmidt SO. «The Moscow State»: An explanation of the name of the Russian state of the 16th018th centuries. In: Schmidt SO. Russia of Ivan the Terrible. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 2010. Pp. 255–301. (In Russ.).

23. Schmitt C. The state as a concrete concept associated with a certain historical epoch. Logos. 2012;5(89):205- 215. (In Russ.).

24. Skinner Q. Collingwood’s Approach to the History of Political Thought: formation, Challenge, Prospects. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2004;2(66):55-66. (In Russ.).

25. Skinner Q. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. The Cambridge School: Theory and Practice of Intellectual History. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2018. Pp. 53–122. (In Russ.).

26. Skinner Q. The Ideological Context of Hobbes’s Political Thought. The Historical Journal. 1966;9(1):286-317. Skinner Q. The State. In: Ball T, Farr J, Hanson RL (eds). Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge; 1994. Pp. 90–131.

27. Skinner Q. The State. The concept of the state in four languages. St. Petersburg: Evrop. un‑t v S.-Peterb. Publ.; 2002. Pp. 12–74. (In Russ.).

28. Stolleis M. The History of Public Law in Germany: The Weimar Republic and National Socialism. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).

29. Teschke B. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Creation of Modern International Relations. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics; 2019. (In Russ.).

30. The Cambridge School: Theory and Practice of Intellectual History. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).

31. The history of concepts, the history of discourse, the history of mentality. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

32. Vulpius R. Towards the semantics of Empire in Russia of the 18th century: The conceptual field of civilization. In: Miller AI, Sdvizhkov DA, Shirle I (eds). «Concepts about Russia»: On the historical semantics of the Imperial period. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2012. Pp. 50–70. (In Russ.).

33. Whatmore R. What is intellectual history? Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).