Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

EcoClimate and ESG Disputes: Practice, Risks, Prospects

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.214.9.009-021

Abstract

The ecoclimate or «green» agenda, largely constituted through the concept of «sustainable development» and the system of ESG standards, has captured the world and is changing society, generating new social patterns, and ceasing business and management models. This encourages rethinking the legal superstructure, adapting new regulatory arrays to the current legal taxonomy, which is not always possible, taking into account the positivist approach to law and a significant amount of «soft» law rules and sources of non-state regulation within the framework of «green» regulation. The ecoclimate agenda has a number of dimensions in the context of law and jurisprudence, one of which is the practice of ecoclimate and ESG disputes, often of a cross-border nature. Very little attention is paid to this issue in the Russian research space, while the volume of relevant lawsuits in the world is growing rapidly. The object of the study within the framework of this work covers the risk-oriented nature of the above-mentioned issues, the licensing risks of mainly cross-border contracts, the assessment of companies’ activities in the field of sustainable development in the context of possible judicial or arbitration proceedings. The paper provides a classification of ecoclimate and ESG disputes, gives examples of judicial and arbitration practice, and makes some conclusions regarding mitigation of litigation risks generated by the companies’ activities.

About the Author

M. V. Mazhorina
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Russian Federation

Maria V. Mazhorina, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of International Private Law; Vice-Rector for Strategic and International Development, Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), Head of the Center of Competences «Sustainable Development Law. ESG Standards»

Moscow



References

1. Ermakova EP. Specifics of resolving disputes in the field of climate protection by state courts and arbitration. RUDN Journal of Law. 2022;26(1):192-209. (In Russ.).

2. ESG Litigation Guide. Available at: https://engagepremium.hoganlovells.com/_reports/esg-litigation-guidereport-20240804-215303.pdf [Accessed 09.09.2024].

3. Hackett D, Demas R, Sanders D, Wicha J, and Fowler A. А growing ESG risks of litigation. Available at: https://insightplus.bakermckenzie.com/bm/attachment_dw.action?attkey=FRbANEucS95NMLRN47z%2BeeOgEFCt8EGQJsWJiCH2WAWHb%2FPDBPVvguIFm%2BtSugID&nav=FRbANEucS95NMLRN47z%2BeeOgEFCt8EGQbuwypnpZjc4%3D&attdocparam=pB7HEsg%2FZ312Bk8OIuOIH1c%2BY4beLEAenR5wi6BMndE%3D&fromContentView=1. [Accessed 09.09.2024].

4. Majorina MV. ESG principles in international business and sustainable contracts. Aktual’nye problem rossijskogo prava. 2021;16(12):185-198. (In Russ.).

5. Majorina MV. Sustainable Development Law: Essence, Subject and Methodology. Lex russica. 2022;75(5):117-126. (In Russ.).

6. Mazhorina MV and Shakhnazarov BA (eds.). Sustainable law and ESG standards. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2023.

7. Piumpton LM, Cumbo-Steinmetz Sh, Terry JA, and Allen H. ESG litigation risk. Available at: https://www.torys.com/Our%20Latest%20Thinking/Publications/2021/03/esg-litigation-risk/ [Accessed 09.09.2024].

8. Setzer J, Higham C. Global trends in climate: 2024 snapshot. Available at: https://climatecasechart.com/about/ [Accessed 09.09.2024].

9. Summerville Т, Soukup А, and Wu LF. A Closer Look: Developing Trends in ESG Litigation. Available at: https://www.insideclassactions.com/2024/04/18/a-closer-look-developing-trends-in-esg-litigation/ [Accessed 04.08.2024].


Review

For citations:


Mazhorina M.V. EcoClimate and ESG Disputes: Practice, Risks, Prospects. Lex Russica. 2024;77(9):9-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.214.9.009-021

Views: 277


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)