Synergetic Vectors of Development of Individual Forensic Theories in the context of Modern Criminal Proceedings (a Preliminary Aspect)

A rapidly developing society determines the need to adjust well-established approaches to understanding and regulating crime prevention mechanisms. It should be noted that the modern criminal policy of the state is on the verge of systemic changes. Balance of public and private interests; authority and independence of subjects of criminal proceedings; means of combating crime and social control; public and secret methods of exposing criminals; conflict and compromise; defense and prosecution; complex and simplified procedural forms of legal proceedings; inevitability of criminal prosecution and conciliation procedures; verbal and digital technologies in legal proceedings; professional skills and technical means — these are the few systemic formations, the content of which requires a modern rethinking with dew regard to prevailing realities of the functioning of society. And here the key supporting role in the formation of effective technologies for solving the problems of modern criminal proceedings, as a mechanism of complex systemic formations operating in the context of multifactorial law enforcement practice, belongs to criminalistic science. At the same time, an important tool in understanding and modeling promising vectors of the development of a system of private forensic theories is the synergetic approach, which significantly complements the wellestablished structural and systemic method in scientific knowledge. The use of the synergetics methodology makes it possible to identify not only the intrastructural connections of the system of forensic knowledge, but also to assess how such a system as a whole is affected by external (legal, ideological, etc.) factors. And the most important thing is to ensure the harmonious (regarding the changing realities of law enforcement practice) progressive development of individual private forensic theories.

1. Altaev EA. Tactics of interrogation of the defendant by the state prosecutor at a court hearing. Author’s Abstract. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.).

2. Andreev AS. Criminalistics in the context of the development of digital technologies. Intellectual Resources for Regional Development. 2020;2:456 461. (In Russ.).

3. Avakian MV. Methods of investigation and maintenance of state charges in cases of intentional infliction of serious harm to health. Author’s Abstract. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Kaliningrad; 2018. (In Russ.).

4. Babaeva EU. Fundamentals of the criminalistic theory of overcoming the resistance to criminal prosecution. Author’s Abstract. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).

5. Baev OYa. Fundamentals of the methodology of criminal prosecution and professional protection against it: a scientific and practical guide (on the example of a corner-procedural study of official and official crimes). Moscow: Eksmo Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.).

6. Baev OYa. Pragmatic foundations of criminalistic methodology of criminal procedural investigation of crimes of certain types. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2007;1:254,279. (In Russ.).

7. Baev OYa. Tactics of criminal prosecution and professional protection from it. Investigative tactics: scientific and practical manual. Moscow: Exam Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

8. Bedrizov AG, Volchetskaya TS, Galyashin NV [et al.]; Komissarova YaV (ed.). Criminalistic study of personality: A scientific and practical guide for LL.M. Students. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

9. Belkin RS. Criminalistic encyclopedia. Moscow: Megatron XXI Publ.; 2000. (In Russ.).

10. Budanov VG. Methodology of synergetics in postnonclassical science. In: Facets of cognition: science, philosophy, culture in the 21st century. Moscow: URSS Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).

11. Delokarov KH. Synergetics and cognition of social transformations. In: Synergetic paradigm. Man and society in conditions of instability. Moscow: Progress-Tradition Publ.; 2003. (In Russ.).

12. Garmaev YuP, Shashin DG. Features of the forensic methodology of investigation and maintenance of public prosecution in a criminal cases on drug trafficking. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.).

13. Garmaev YuP. Theoretical foundations of the formation of criminalistic methods of crime investigation. Author’s Abstract. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.).

14. Glazyrin FV. Criminalistic study of the personality of the accused. Author’s Abstract. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Sverdlovsk; 1973. (In Russ.).

15. Gribunov OP. Criminalistic theory of causality in the context of establishing the mechanism of trace formation: philosophical and theoretical aspects. Tomsk State University Journal. 2019;446:207-211. (In Russ.).

16. Gusev AA. Identification on the basis of appearance. Author’s Abstract. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 1955. (In Russ.).

17. Kim DV. Gavlo VK (ed.). Criminalistic situations and their resolution in criminal proceedings. Barnaul: Publishing House of Alt. Unita; 2006. (In Russ.).

18. Kislenko SL. Typification of the personality and behavior of the defendant and its role in maintaining public prosecution in court. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2021;2:110-117. (In Russ.).

19. Knyazeva EN. Synergetic challenge to culture. Synergetic paradigm. The variety of searches and approaches. Moscow: Progress — Tradition Publ.; 2000. (In Russ.).

20. Komarov IM, Yan EI. Criminalistic theory of causality: some philosophical and theoretical foundations. Problems of Law Enforcement. 2017;1:21-27. (In Russ.).

21. Lavrov VP. Private forensic theories: current state and development trends. Proceedings of the Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences. 2016;3-2:85-90. (In Russ.).

22. Lushechkina MA. Criminalistic study of personality in the tactics of investigation. Author’s Abstract. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.).

23. Makarenko IA. The identity of a minor accused as an object of forensic research. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).

24. Malykhina NI. A person who has committed a crime as an object of study in criminology. Saratov: Publishing house of FGBOU VPO «SGUA»; 2012. (In Russ.).

25. Novik V. Maintaining the state prosecution in cases of illegal drug trafficking. Zakonnost’. 2006;9:20-22. (In Russ.).

26. Osipova EV, Preibis I.I. Judicial tactics in the study of the defendant’s personality. Izvestiya Tula State University. Economics and Law. 2018;2-2:88-95. (In Russ.).

27. Posokhina IV. Criminalistic aspects of maintaining state prosecution in cases of bribery. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. St. Petersburg; 2006. (In Russ.).

28. Protasevich AA, Voigel EI. On the possibilities of forensic habitoscopy in the implementation of measures to counter modern cybercrime. All-Russian Journal of Criminology. 2020;14(3):471-480. (In Russ.).

29. Ruzavin GI. Methodology of scientific cognition. Moscow: Unity-Dana Publ.; 2005. (In Russ.).

30. Snetkov VA. Method of identification based on the appearance of persons photographed with a significant time gap. Moscow; 1971. (In Russ.).

31. Stepin VS. Scientific rationality in the humanistic dimension. In: About the human in the Man. Moscow: Politizdat Publ.; 1991. (In Russ.).

32. Terziev NV. Criminalistic identification of personality by signs of appearance: studies. Moscow: VUZI Publishing House; 1956. (In Russ.).

33. Valkyria NI. Actual tasks of the criminalistic study of man at the present stage. Vestnik of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2023;4:101-111. (In Russ.).

34. Valkyrie NI, Leontiev AD. Neurocomputing: possibilities and prospects of application in the investigation of crimes. Kriminalist. 2023;4:6-8. (In Russ.).

35. Volchetskaya TS. Yablokov NP (ed.). Criminalistic situalogy. Moscow: Kaliningr University Press; Kaliningrad; 1997. (In Russ.).

36. Voloshin VM. Maintaining public prosecution in court with the participation of jurors. In: Investigative practice. Scientific and practical collection of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. Issue No. 184. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).

37. Zhbankov VA. Conceptual foundations of establishing the identity of a criminal in criminology. Author’s Abstract. Dr. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).