Conceptual Approaches to the International Legal Definition of the Concept of «Aggression» and the Problems of Improving Russian Legislation

Based on the study of doctrinal sources, contractual legal regulation and judicial practice materials, the paper defines legal models for the establishment of acts of aggression: the Nuremberg-Tokyo model (as a contractual one, only stating the fact of aggressive war and to a certain extent functional for the purpose of establishing individual criminal responsibility) and the universal UN model (or a political and legal model related to the establishment of an act of aggression as a violation of the territorial integrity or political independence of states and with the subsequent transfer of the case to the International Criminal Court for prosecution to bring the perpetrators to justice). There is a tendency to overestimate the «internationality» in defining acts of aggression by removing national jurisdictions from the possibility of qualifying acts of armed attack by stating the statutory authority of the UN Security Council in determining the committed act of aggression (Article 39 of the UN Charter). The «regional» and «bilateral» models of countering acts of aggression within the framework of fulfilling allied obligations are considered. An objective model of suppressing an armed attack and its consequences is proposed as a subjective imputation by the injured state (group of states) of committing an act of aggression to the aggressor state (group of states), which can be implemented in the legislation and law enforcement practice of Russia. The paper reflects the main points from the speech delivered by Professor Batyr on May 28, 2024 at a round table in the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on the topic «The concept of aggression in international law and Russian doctrinal documents».

1. Blokker N. The crime of aggression and the United Nations Security Council. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2007;20:(4):867-894.

2. Boltanova ES, Zdorovtseva AA, Zolotova OA, et al. Administrative and legal regimes in public administration in the Russian Federation: theory and modern practice: A monograph. Ed. by Nozdrachev AF. Moscow: IZiSP under the Government of the Russian Federation: Kontrakt Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).

3. Boucher-Saulnier F. Practical Dictionary of Humanitarian Law. Transl. from French by Kirpichnikova E, Saditdinova V. 2nd ed., suppl., exp. Moscow: MKKK Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).

4. Brilliantov VA, editor. Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Article by article: In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).

5. Bunyon F. Just war, aggressive war and international humanitarian law. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 2002;847:205-233. (In Russ.).

6. Cassese A. On some problematical aspects of the crime of aggression. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2007;20:(4):841-849.

7. Cryer R, Friman H, Robinson D, Wilmshurst E. An introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

8. Dabone Z. International law: Armed groups in a state-centric system Revue. International Review of the Red Cross. 2011;93(882):395-423.

9. Dzeitova RB. The basis of individual criminal responsibility for the crime of aggression. Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2024. (In Russ.).

10. Esakov GA, editor. Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (article by article). Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

11. Farkhutdinov IZ. Pre-emptive self-defense in international law: Application and abuse. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. 2016;4:97-124. (In Russ.).

12. Glotova SV. The crime of aggression: Some legal problems of definition in the Nuremberg Statute and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. 2017;2:87-96. (In Russ.).

13. Gray Ch. International law on the use of force. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.

14. Grinvud K. Advisory opinion on Nuclear Weapons and the contribution of the International Court of Justice to the development of international humanitarian law. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 1997;316:62- 71. (In Russ.).

15. Inogamova-Khegay LV. Issues of the crime of aggression in international criminal law. In: Bogusha GI, Trikoz EN, editors. The International Criminal Court: Problems, discussions, search for solutions. Moscow: European Commission; 2008. Pp. 164–186. (In Russ.).

16. Kamto M. L’agression en droit international. Ed. by A. Pedone. 2010.

17. Kemp G. Individual criminal liability for the international crime of aggression. Intersentia; 2016.

18. Kibalnik AG. The crime of aggression: The deceived expectations of international criminal law. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Journal of Criminology]. 2019;2:300-310. (In Russ.).

19. Kolb R. On the origin of the terminological pair jus ad bellum / jus in bello. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. Special issue. 1997;320:80-88. (In Russ.).

20. Kozhukharik DN, editor. Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).

21. Kramer RC, Michalowski RJ. War, aggression and state crime: A criminological analysis of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. British Journal of Criminology. 2005;4(4):446-469.

22. Kress C. The crime of aggression before the first review of the ICC Statute. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2007;20(4):851-865.

23. Lobach DV. Crimes against peace: Criminal law research. Author’s abstract of Cand. Diss. (Law). Saratov; 2013. (In Russ.).

24. Lobach DV. Problematic aspects of the legal regulation of responsibility for the crime of aggression. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. 2021;3:38-44. (In Russ.).

25. Lobach DV. The subject of a crime manifested in the form of aggression in international law and Russian criminal legislation. Zakon i pravo [Law and Legislation]. 2011;4:80-83. (In Russ.).

26. Malakhova OV. Aggression as a crime under international and national criminal law. Cand. Diss. (Law). Stavropol; 2003. (In Russ.).

27. Maleev YuN. Who and how was tried in Nuremberg (a story with a sequel). Mezhdunarodnoe pravo [International law]. 2006;3(27):191-220. (In Russ.).

28. Marusin IS. Definition of aggression in the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the statute of the Nuremberg Tribunal. Pravovedenie. 2013;4(309):112-120. (In Russ.).

29. McDougall C. The crime of aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2013.

30. Muller-Schieke IK. Defining the crime of aggression under the Statute of the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2001;14(2):409-430.

31. Obrazhiev KV, Pikurov NI, editors. Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Vol. 2: Special part (Sections VII–VIII). Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

32. Opalich EV. Problems of implementation of the international legal definition of aggression in the legislation of Latin American countries. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2021;3:23-26. (In Russ.).

33. Pancracio JP. Un mutant juridique: l’agression internationale. Institut de Recherche Stratégique de l’École Militaire IRSEM. 2011;7.

34. Rarog AI, editor. Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. 14th ed. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

35. Reisinger Coracini A. Evaluating domestic legislation on the customary crime of aggression under the Rome Statute’s complementarity regime. In: Stahn C, Sluiter G, editors. The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court. Leiden-Boston; 2009. Pp. 725–754.

36. Sando I. Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 1997;316:79. (In Russ.).

37. Sayapin SV. Definition of the crime of aggression and national criminal law systems. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International justice]. 2012;1(2):87-97. (In Russ.).

38. Timoshkov SG. Aggression as an international crime. Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).

39. Timoshkov SG. Formation of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in relation to the crime of aggression. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya [Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law]. 2017;3:136-141. (In Russ.).

40. Tuzmukhamedov BR. Pre-emption by force: «Carolina» and modernity. Rossiya v globalnoy politike. 2006;4(2):204-213. (In Russ.).

41. Yakushin VA. Subjective imputation and its significance in criminal law. Tolyatti: TolPI Publ.; 1998. (In Russ.).

42. Zourek J. Enfin une définition de l’agression. Annuaire français de droit international. 1974;20:9-30.