The Constitutional Principle of Equality as a Complex Concept: Problems of the Addressee and the Degree of Implementation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.219.2.033-041
Abstract
The Constitution of the Russian Federation uses concepts that are different from the legal point of view, namely: «equality before the law» and «equality of rights» The first term means equal treatment by the law, but not equal rights and obligations. And only in this case, the word «all» used in Art. 19 may have a valid meaning: a citizen, a legal entity, a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, and the State itself are equal since they are equal regarding legal norms applied to them, which, of course, will contain various prescriptions in relation to these subjects. Today, the issue of recognizing and protecting so-called group rights is very relevant. The rights of the second generation — socio-economic rights — are largely related to the actual conditions for their implementation: if personal rights are based on the idea of formal equality, then for this group of rights equality presupposes «affirmative actions» of the State aimed at equalizing the actual conditions of legal use. In this regard, the problem of opposition to formal and actual equality arises: actual equality is usually considered as opposition to formal equality. Meanwhile, if we switch to the language of strict terminology, then actual equality does not mean at all equality of the result or socio-economic equality, but only formal equality that means ensuring it by mechanisms of its «factual» implementation.
About the Author
M. V. PresnyakovRussian Federation
Mikhail V. Presnyakov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Constitutional and International Law; Professor, Department of Constitutional Law named after Professor I.E. Farber and Professor V.T. Kabyshev
Saratov
References
1. Avdeenkova MP, Golovistikova AN, Grudtsyna LYu, et al. Constitution of the Russian Federation: doctrinal commentary (article-by-article). 2nd ed. Moscow; Statute; 2013. (In Russ.).
2. Bondar NS. Judicial constitutionalism in Russia in the light of constitutional justice. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M Publ.; 2011. (In Russ.).
3. Chetvernin VA (ed.). Constitution of the Russian Federation: problematic comment. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.).
4. Golovin EG. Does the equality of religious associations before the law allow the existence of «traditional religions?” Vlast’. 2018;9:86. (In Russ.).
5. Komkova GN. Constitutional principle of equality of human rights and freedoms in Russia. Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House; 2002. (In Russ.).
6. Krasinsky VV. Protection of state sovereignty. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
7. Lapaeva VV. Legal principle of formal equality. Journal of Russian Law. 2008;2. (In Russ.).
8. Nersesyants VS. Philosophy of Law. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.).
9. Tyutin DV. Tax law: course of lectures. «ConsultantPlus» Reference Database. 2020. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Presnyakov M.V. The Constitutional Principle of Equality as a Complex Concept: Problems of the Addressee and the Degree of Implementation. Lex Russica. 2025;78(2):33–41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.219.2.033-041