Expert Activity in Public Administration: Constructing a Definition in Law

In the modern world, the use of expert competencies to justify management decisions is widely spread. A significant amount of expert activity takes place in the field of public administration, where it has its legal framework. However, there is currently no comprehensive law in the Russian Federation that defines the foundations for organizing expert activity in the field of public administration. To substantiate the significance of this issue and demonstrate the existing approaches in the scientific literature, the paper provides a systematic analysis of the understanding of expert activity by scholars from various disciplines and summarizes the views of legal scholars on the problem of the lack of a unified scientific and legal basis for regulating the relationshipsarising from the implementation of expert activity in public administration. Special attention is given to the terminological foundation of this type of expert activity to determine its place and role in the public administration system. The author offers a novel approach to formulating the definition of «expert activity in the field of public administration». The application of one of the categorical methods of systematic analysis has allowed for the development of a scientifically grounded construct. Through the formal-logical method of defining the concept, the author elucidates the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the legal category «expert activity in the field of public administration». The outcome obtained may serve as a basis for improving the conceptual framework of legislation on expert activity in the field of public administration.

1. Abboskhonov TKU. Concept and Purposes of Conducting Scientific-Legal Expertise of Draft Laws. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology. 2021;3(7):19-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue07-04 [Accessed 27.10.2024].

2. Aristarkhov AE, Sukhorukova NF. Expertise as a Type of Professional Activity. Discourse. 2018;2(16):111-119. (In Russ.).

3. Ashkerov AA. Expertocracy. Knowledge Management: Production and Circulation of Information in the Era of Ultrapitalism. Moscow: Europa Publ.; 2009. (In Russ.).

4. Averyanova TV. Judicial Expertise. Course of General Theory. Moscow: Norma, Infra M Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

5. Bakhrah DN. Administrative Law of Russia: A Textbook for Higher Educational Institutions. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.).

6. Baranova MV. Improper Advertising in Contemporary Russia: Legal Issues in the Preparation and Implementation of Expert Examination Results. Juridical Techniques. 2022;16:76-82. (In Russ.).

7. Belsky VI, Primshits DV, Trigubovich LG. Development of Analytical Competencies in Academic Clusters as a Tool for Strengthening Expert Support in Public Administration. Vescì Nacyânalʹnaj akadèmìì navuk Belarusì. Seryâ gumanìtarnyh navuk [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series]. 2020;65(3):367-376.

8. Bezdudnaya AG, Rastova YuI. Narratives of expert activity in the sphere of engineering. 2022;2(82):189-191. (In Russ.).

9. Biktimirov MR, Pilipenko OV, Safonov MS. On the devaluation of expert opinion or why do we need a law about the basics of expert activity. Public Administration. 2020;22(3):19-24. (In Russ.).

10. Bishmanov BM. Judicial Expert and Judicial Specialist. Moscow: Moscow Psychological and Social University Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

11. Bochkareva EA, Butko LV. Some problems in the doctrine of expert activities and expert examination in the field of financial relations. Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2019;442:209-216. (In Russ.).

12. Boush GD, Razumov VI. Methodology of Scientific Research (in Candidate and Doctoral Dissertations). Moscow: Infra M Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

13. Brinkmann M, Heine M. The Implementation of New Public Governance Through Blockchain: A Delphi-based analysis. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery. 2022;October:1 9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3560107.3560108 [Accessed 27.10.2024].

14. Dikanova TA. Issues of improving legislation about expert activity. Juridical Journal of Samara University. 2021;7(2):96-105. (In Russ.).

15. Edelmann N, Mergel I. Co-Production of digital public services in Austrian public administrations. Administrative Science. 2021;11(1):1-21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010022 [Accessed 27.10.2024].

16. Egorov VK. «Expertocracy:” on the institutional essence of the phenomenon. Sociology of Power. 2012;3:5- 12. (In Russ.).

17. Fedorova TV. Strengthening the Role of the Expert in Achieving the Objectives of Proceedings in Cases of Administrative Offenses Identified During Regulatory and Supervisory Activities. In: Stakhov AI (ed.). Current Issues in Optimizing Extrajudicial and Judicial Procedures for Resolving Administrative Cases Arising from State Control and Supervision Relations. Collection of Articles. Moscow: RGUП Publ.; 2021. Pp. 81–91. (In Russ.).

18. Fejes E, Futó I. Artificial intelligence in Public Administration — Supporting Administrative Decisions. Public Finance Quarterly. 2021;66(S1):23-51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_s_1_2 [Accessed 27.10.2024]. (In Russ.).

19. Kazakov MA, Bespalov DN. Public expertise: problems of institutionalization in priorities of development policy. PACIFIC RIM: Economics, Politics, Law. 2018;20(1 2):65-78. (In Russ.).

20. Koldin VYa, Smirnova SA. Examination in management and law. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012;1(25):24-32. (In Russ.).

21. Koldin VYa. Expertise and Law. Zakonodatel’stvo. 1999;9:69-82. (In Russ.).

22. Komissarova YaV. Conceptual Foundations of Expert Activity in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow: YurLitInform Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

23. Krasheninnikova YuA. The problems of ensuring the quality of experts’ work: the case of media content evaluation in the Russian Federation. Administrative Consulting. 2019;3(123):87-103. (In Russ.).

24. Litvak BG. Expert Technologies in Management. Moscow: Delo, Academy of National Economy under the Government of the Russian Federation Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).

25. Mailis NP. A Handbook for Experts. 4th ed. Moscow: Unity-Dana: Zakon i pravo Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

26. Mamitova NV. Expert examination as an interdisciplinary institute. State Legal Research. 2020;3:101-106. (In Russ.).

27. Masharov IM. Administrative and Public Activities in Russia: Problems of Legal Regulationю Moscow: Yurist Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).

28. Mironov AN. Dugenets AG (ed.). Administrative Procedures for the Preparation of Normative Legal Acts by Federal Executive Authorities. Vladimir: VIT-Print Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).

29. Mitskevich LA. Essays on the Theory of Administrative Law: Contemporary Content. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).

30. Nesterov AV. Expertise: General Theory of Expertise. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.).

31. Nesterov AV. Expertocracy in Russia. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review. 2014;41:281-295. (In Russ.).

32. Novikov DA, Raikova AN (eds.). Network Expertise. Moscow: Egves Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.).

33. Osintsev DV. Realities of public administration and the subject of the administrative science. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2022;1:31-34. (In Russ.).

34. Popov EV. Expert Systems: Solving Unformalized Problems in Dialogue with Computers. Moscow: Nauka. Chief Ed. of Physical and Mathematical Literature; 1987. (In Russ.).

35. Popov LL, Migacheva EV, Tikhomirov SV. Public Administration in Russia and Foreign Countries: Administrative and Legal Aspects. Moscow: Norma, Infra M Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).

36. Popov LL. Renaissance of Public Administration in Russia. Selected Works. Moscow: Norma, Infra M Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.).

37. Ravochkin NN. Modern world transition to expertocracy: socio-philosophical analysis. The Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;90(1):22-27. (In Russ.).

38. Rossinskaya ER. Judicial Expertise in Civil, Arbitration, Administrative, and Criminal Proceedings. 4th ed. Moscow: Norma, Infra M Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

39. Rossinskiy BV. Executive Power in the System of Public Administration. Moscow: Norma, Infra M Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

40. Sidelnikov YuV. Expertology — a New Scientific Discipline. Avtomatika i telemekhanika. 2000;2:107-126. (In Russ.).

41. Sidelnikov YuV. Formation of the Conceptual and Terminological Framework of Expertology. Problemy upravleniya. 2017;5:18-30. (In Russ.).

42. Sidelnikov YuV. System Analysis of Expert Forecasting Technology. Moscow: MAI-Print Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).

43. Sosunov DV. Role of expert community during acceptance of political decisions. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: History. Political science. Sociology. 2012;1:170-172. (In Russ.).

44. Starilov YuN. Administrative Law: in 2 parts. Part 1: History. Science. Subject. Norms. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ.; 1998. (In Russ.).

45. Sterilov YuN (ed.). General Administrative Law: Textbook: in 2 parts. Voronezh State University. 2nd edition. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

46. Sungurov A. Yu. Expert Communities and Power. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

47. Svetlov VA. Logics: A Study Guide. Moscow: Logos Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

48. Tikhomirov YuA. A Course on Administrative Law and Procedure. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.).

49. Timerbulatova NE, Arsenov VV, Krasyukov AV. Application of sociological methods for expertise of the normative legal documents. The Legal Culture. 2022;4(51):58-66. (In Russ.).

50. Umanskaya VP, Malevanova YuV. Public Administration and Civil Service in Modern Russia. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).

51. Varfolomeev AA, Ivanov OP, Surma IV, Trefilova YuA. Expert-analytical support of foreign policy activities. The MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021;14(5):22-48. (In Russ.).

52. Vinberg AI, Malakhovskaya NT. Forensic Expertology (General Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Forensic Expertise). Volgograd, 1979. (In Russ.).

53. Volkov VI, Sukharev OS, Chichkanov VP. Expertise of solutions in the public administration system. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic Strategies]. 2022;24(1(181)):80-91. (In Russ.).

54. Yang L. Developing collaboration between research-oriented and practice-oriented experts in public administration: How does expert participation make a difference in public policy making and governance practice? Public Policy and Administration. 2020;38(1):1-25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720958468 [Accessed 27.10.2024]. (In Russ.).

55. Yendovitsky DA, Podlesnykh SA. Organizational stages of economic analysis of expert activity in a competitive environment. Modern Economy: Problems and Solutions. 2023;4(160):58-70. (In Russ.).

56. Zotov VV. Organization of expert activity on digital network platforms. Administrative Consulting. 2022;11(167):55-66. (In Russ.).

57. Marchenko GI. Political expertise as an element of political marketing. Prakticheskiy marketing. 2012;7:31-38. (In Russ.).