Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Platform Relations as a Subject of Legal Regulation

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.228.11.009-033

Abstract

The paper is dedicated to analyzing the platform economy as a specific subject (or rather, a collection of interrelated subjects) of legal regulation, identifying problematic aspects in the formation of legal frameworks. The study reviews the historical development of approaches and actual regulation applied in Russia, analyzes the provisions of Federal Law No. 289-FZ «On Certain Issues of Regulating the Platform Economy in the Russian Federation» adopted on July 31, 2025; highlights the complexity of defining the term «digital platform»; and evaluates the structure of the law under consideration, compares the law with previously adopted laws regulating relationships among entities using platforms, between these entities and the person facilitating the platform’s functioning (the owner or operator), as well as other closely related relationships (or platform relationships). The terminology used in the law is also examined. The authors identify key regulatory problem areas that have emerged since the adoption of the law, namely, the multiplicity of definitions for the term «digital platform», as well as the existence of analogous terms (aggregator in consumer protection legislation). The authors believe it is necessary to conduct a review of the existing regulations, unify terminology where necessary, and eliminate the contradictions that have arisen.

About the Authors

A. V. Gabov
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Gabov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Acting Head of the Sector for Civil and Business Law; Chief Research Fellow

Moscow



S. P. Sayapin
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Sergey P. Sayapin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Research Fellow, Sector for Civil and Business Law

Moscow



References

1. Andreeva LV. Legal Support for the Conclusion of Purchase and Sale Transactions of Goods on Marketplaces (Digital Trading Platforms): Participants, Contracts, Platform-Based Employment, Taxation. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2025. (In Russ.).

2. Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics. 2006;37(3):668-691.

3. Caillaud B, Jullien B. Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics. 2003;34(2):309-328.

4. Evans D. The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation. 2003;20(2):325-381.

5. Filippova SYu, Kharitonova YuS. Digital platforms in law and the law of digital platforms: New challenges for the legislator and ways to deal with them. Pravovedenie, 2025;69(1):58-75, DOI: 10.21638/spbu25.2025.104. (In Russ.).

6. Filistrucchi L, Geradin D, van Damme E, Affeldt P. Market Definition in Two-Sided Markets: Theory and Practice (March 16, 2013). TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2013-009. Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 09/2013.

7. Gabov AV. Digital Platform as a New Legal Phenomenon. Perm Legal Almanac. 2021;4:13-82. (In Russ.).

8. Gabov AV. Legal Regulation of Crowdfunding in Russia. Belgorod: BelGU NIU «BelGU» Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

9. Hagiu A, Wright J. Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2015;43:162-174.

10. Karapetyan AA. Legal regulation of digital platforms and antimonopoly control: application practice. Russian Competition Law and Economy. 2024;2(38):38-45, DOI: 10.47361/2542-0259-2024-2-38-38-45. (In Russ.).

11. Komenko EG. On Features of Functioning of the Digital Ruble Platform. Economy and Law. 2023;10:91-102. (In Russ.).

12. Koshel AS, Kuzminov YaI, Kruchinskaya EV, Lesiv BV. In Search of Regulatory Optimum for Digital Platforms: A Comparative Analysis. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2025;18(2):4-58, DOI: 10.17323/20728166.2025.2.4.58. (In Russ.).

13. Maslov AO. Antitrust Requirements for the Functioning of Digital Platforms: Legal Aspect. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ.).

14. Raizberg BA, Lozovskiy LSh, Skorodubtseva EB. Modern Economic Dictionary. Moscow: Infra-M; 2007. (In Russ.).

15. Rochet JC, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003;4:990-029.

16. Rochet JC, Tirole J. Two-sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics. 2006;37(3):645-667.

17. Savenkov AN. A New Technological Order and Socio-Humanitarian Challenges. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2025;1:14-36. (In Russ.).

18. Sayapin SP. Civil-Law Regulation of Investment Relations Using Digital Platforms. Cand. Sci. (Law). Diss. Moscow; 2024. (In Russ.).

19. Shastitko A, Parshina E. Two-sided markets: the subject matter specification. Journal of Modern Competition, 2016;10(1):5-18. (In Russ.).

20. Shestitko AE, Markova OA. Aggregators Around us: the new Reality and Approaches to Research. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2017;4:5-15. (In Russ.).

21. Tirole J. Economics for the Common Good. Tr. from French by I.E. Sheveleva. Moscow; Gaidar Institute Publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).

22. Vavilin EV. Digital ruble: Formation of the mechanism of legal regulation. Tomsk State University Journal. 2023;489:201-206, DOI: 10.17223/15617793/489/20. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Gabov A.V., Sayapin S.P. Platform Relations as a Subject of Legal Regulation. Lex Russica. 2025;78(11):9-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.228.11.009-033

Views: 51


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)