Defects in the Mechanism of Heads of Public Authorities’ Response to Incidents and other Negative Phenomena
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.228.11.096-109
Abstract
The paper analyzes the issues of legality and expediency of holding state and municipal employees disciplinarily liable for the occurrence of incidents and other negative phenomena within their area of responsibility. From the standpoint of organizational and legal effectiveness, the author examines the grounds for bringing employees to disciplinary responsibility, identifies the relationship between standard formulations of public officials’ duties and the occurrence of incidents, other negative phenomena, and the dynamics of growth in negative statistical reporting indicators. It is noted that in some cases there is an objective imputation where employees are held responsible for breaching their duties without proof of fault. The author identifies the following causes of this dysfunction: the element of discretion inherent in every public authority manager, the underdevelopment in Russian labor and administrative law of issues concerning the adequacy and legality of managerial measures, and the corporate ethics of government officials. Sometimes, for public officials, the expansion of the boundaries of administrative regulation turns from a means of managing public relations into an end in itself. To identify the causes of this defect in managerial activity, the study examines the historical prerequisites and corporate behavioral standards of the Russian bureaucracy, materials from judicial practice, and data from sociological and psychological research.
About the Author
E. A. GlukhovRussian Federation
Evgeny A. Glukhov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
St. Petersburg
References
1. Alekseev SS. General theory of law. Works in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Legal literature; 1981. (In Russ.).
2. Alexandrov YuI, Svarnik OE, Znamenskaya II, Kolbeneva MG, Arutyunova KR, Krylov AK, Bulava AI. Regression as a stage of development. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2017. (In Russ.).
3. Atamanchuk GV. About the peculiarities of professionalism in management. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek [Law and management. The 21st century]. 2012;2(23):56-61. (In Russ.).
4. Atamanchuk GV. Theory of government control: A textbook. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga; 2010. (In Russ.).
5. Bayteryakov SV, Baryshnikova AV, Kopyt VK, et al. Personnel policy in the civil service: Сurrent problems and necessary changes. Ed. by Shklyaruk MS. Moscow: Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, Center for Advanced Management Solutions; 2021. (In Russ.).
6. Danakari RR. Objective imputation in the practice of Soviet political justice. Yurist-Pravoved. 2008:2(27):92-95. (In Russ.).
7. Egorov OG. Society and Law in the Literary Legacy of M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Obshchestvo i pravo. 2012;3(40):282-288. (In Russ.).
8. Eropkin MI. Selected scientific works. Moscow: Moscow: Eksmo; 2010. (In Russ.).
9. Fussel K. Eliminate bureaucracy in your Team. Harvard Business Review — Russia. 2016. July 21. (In Russ.).
10. Hegel G. Philosophy of History. Essays. Vol. 8. Moscow; 1935. (In Russ.).
11. Hull R. The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong. London: Profile Books; 2020.
12. Kovaleva T. Why top managers make inappropriate decisions. Upravlenie kachestvom. 2019;5:64-69. (In Russ.).
13. Kravets IA. «Rule of law» and «good governance» as constitutional values in the public sphere and public administration. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2019;12:38-58. (In Russ.).
14. Kruglova LI. Rules of effective delegation. Rukovoditel stroitelnoy organizatsii. 2010;9:53-59. (In Russ.).
15. Kuprina OA, Koretskaya IA. Deformation in professional activity. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye i socialnye nauki». 2014;4(60):347-349. (In Russ.).
16. Leshchina EL. Scientific and theoretical characteristics of the stage of consideration of a disciplinary case and decision-making. Lex russica. 2022;75(8):47-57. (In Russ.).
17. Makarchenko MA. Theory of organization and organizational behavior: A study guide. St. Petersburg: SPbGUNiPT; 2008. (In Russ.).
18. Martynov EI. From the sad experience of the Russian-Japanese war. St. Petersburg: Voennaya tipographiya Publ.; 1906. (In Russ.).
19. Muzafarov A. Does the accident have a first and last name? Available at: https://www.stoletie.ru/obschestvo/jest_li_u_avarii_ima_i_familija_2011-09-15.htm [Accessed 09.12.2024]. (In Russ.).
20. Ovchinnikov NA. On the content of the administrative and legal mechanism for ensuring legality in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Administrativnoe i municipalnoe pravo. 2011;11:33-38. (In Russ.).
21. Pecherskaya EV. Political mechanisms of dysfunctional manifestations of state power and management in the course of administrative reforms in the Russian Federation. Cand. Diss. (Political Sciences). Rostov on Don; 2016. (In Russ.).
22. Ponkin IV. Theory of deviantology of public administration: Uncertainties, risks, defects, dysfunctions and failures in public administration. IGSU RANHiGS. Moscow: Buki-Vedi Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).
23. Rumyantseva IA, Zhernakova MB, Krotenko TYu. Employee demotivation: Factors and causes. Ekinomicheskie sistemy. 2021;14(2):102-108. (In Russ.).
24. Shapovalova IS. Portrait of a modern official in the context of urban transformation management. Upravlenie gorodom: teoriya i praktika. 2019;1(32):77-85. (In Russ.).
25. Sidorenko IN. Modern Russian official: Who is he, and his role in the functioning of government. Gosudarstvennoe i municipalnoe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS. 2010;3:16-34. (In Russ.).
26. Sorokin VD. Legal regulation: Subject, method, process (macro level). St. Petersburg; 2003. (In Russ.).
27. Tonkov EE. Modernization of legal forms of state activity: A monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2011. (In Russ.).
28. Vedyashkin SV, Glukhov EA. Patron client relations in the system of public authorities in Russia. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo [Tomsk State University Journal. Law]. 2023;47:35-57. (In Russ.).
29. Volkov SD, Galuzina SM. Managerial decision in the organizational management system. Nauchnj zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya «Ekonomika i ekologicheskij menedzhment». 2016;2:92-99. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Glukhov E.A. Defects in the Mechanism of Heads of Public Authorities’ Response to Incidents and other Negative Phenomena. Lex Russica. 2025;78(11):96-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.228.11.096-109





















