Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Legal Regulation of the Practical Use of Medical Artificial Intelligence Systems

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.228.11.154-169

Abstract

In medical practice, a situation requires legal and bioethical justification when a doctor decides on the choice of treatment tactics based on data that becomes available due to the development of artificial intelligence systems and which he is unable to verify himself with a reasonable investment of time, material and other resources. The field under consideration is fundamentally different from the field of verification and administrative procedures for recognizing medical devices that comply with technical regulations, since it does not eliminate the question of to what extent a doctor can legally rely on data from artificial intelligence systems, if, for example, they are counterintuitive. The involvement of artificial intelligence systems cannot be recognized as a trivial evolution of diagnostic technologies that exceed human capabilities, since there are questions about the rotation of expert opinions in the protocol of medical research, as well as the procedure for resolving contradictions. The authors present a study of the legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems in the field of medical diagnostics, based on the analysis of regulatory material, scientific literature, own medical and legal practice. Based on an interdisciplinary approach, integrative solutions to problematic issues aimed at improving regulatory framework in a relatively new area of legal relations in the field of health are proposed. The authors consider the criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of medical solutions and the conditions for the onset of civil liability

About the Authors

K. V. Egorov
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation

Konstantin V. Egorov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law

Kazan 



R. E. Segal
All-Russian National Union «Association of Oncologists of Russia»
Russian Federation

Rodion E. Sigal, Cand. Sci. (Medical Sciences), MBA, Oncologist-Surgeon, Member of the All-Russian National Union «Association of Oncologists of Russia»

Moscow



References

1. Egorov KV. Harm as a condition of tort liability in the field of medical activity. Prakticheskaya medicina. 2006;2(16):37-38. (In Russ.).

2. Egorov KV. Legitimate harm in medicine. Moscow: Statut; 2011. (In Russ.).

3. Falikman MV, Koyfman AYa. Types of priming in the research of perception and perceptual attention. Part I. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14, Psihologiya. 2005;3:86-97. (In Russ.).

4. Gritsenko P, Korneev T. Pathologically helpless intelligence. Kommersant. 2023;216:1. (In Russ.).

5. Gusev AV, Astapenko EM, Ivanov IV, Zarubina TV, Kobrinsky BA. Principles of building trust in artificial intelligence systems for the healthcare sector. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora. 2022;2:25-33. (In Russ.).

6. Karpov OE, Penzin OV, Veselova OV. Organization and regulation of artificial intelligence interaction with doctor and patient. Vestnik Nacional’nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo Centra imeni N.I. Pirogova. 2020;15(2):159. (In Russ.). Kharitonova YuS, Savina VS, Panini F. Bias of artificial intelligence algorithms: Issues of ethics and law. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. Legal sciences]. 2021;3:488-515. (In Russ.).

7. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine Learning in Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;380(14):1347-1358.

8. Spitzer J. IBM’s Watson recommended «unsafe and incorrect» cancer treatments, STAT report finds. Available at: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/artificial-intelligence/ibm-s-watson-recommended-unsafe-and-incorrect-cancer-treatments-stat-report-finds.html [Accessed 30.03.2025].

9. Topol E. Artificial intelligence in medicine. How smart technologies are changing the approach to treatment.

10. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2022. (In Russ.).

11. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series. 1974;185:4157. (Sep. 27, 1974). P. 1124–1131.

12. Tyutcheva ES. The legal personality of an «electronic person»: A theoretical analysis. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya yurisprudenciya. 2022;2(12):50-58. (In Russ.).

13. Uzhov FV. Artificial Intelligence as a subject of law. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve. 2017;3:357-360. (In Russ.).

14. Yastrebov OA. Legal personality of an electronic person: Theoretical and methodological approaches. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law]. 2018;13(12):36-55. (In Russ.).

15. Yukhnova YuI. Artificial intelligence and robots in medicine: The problem of responsibility for harming patients. Yurist [Jurist]. 2023;1:21-26. (In Russ.).

16. Zorkin VD. Law and challenges of artificial intelligence. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2024;9382. Available at: https://rg.ru/2024/06/27/pravo-i-vyzovy-iskusstvennogo-intellekta.html [Accessed 12.03.2025].


Review

For citations:


Egorov K.V., Segal R.E. Legal Regulation of the Practical Use of Medical Artificial Intelligence Systems. Lex Russica. 2025;78(11):154-169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.228.11.154-169

Views: 26


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)