Organizational and Legal Mechanisms for Enhancing the Efficiency of Interaction between the Judicial System, Law Enforcement, and Human Rights Institutions in the Context of Digital Transformation

Currently, across all areas of societal organization and state activity in Russia, the rapid spread of innovative developments and digital technologies — automated data processing, cybernetics, and artificial intelligence — enabling high-speed information exchange makes it imperative to adopt digital transformation tools quickly and efficiently, not only for organizational functioning but also to support interaction among the main elements of the legal system. The fundamental concepts for the digital development of the judicial and law-enforcement systems, to be adopted in the near future, envisage interaction with civil society institutions — primarily human-rights organizations — to ensure the protection of citizens’ rights and freedoms and the interests of business entities. In the context of changing public relations, changes in legislation in the field of innovative and digital technologies, the trends in the development of modern judicial, as well as law enforcement and human rights systems in the field of integrated interaction will be directly related to their use for mutual exchange of experience, advanced training and ensuring intersystem interaction in the process of implementing the target functions provided for by legislation and fulfilling the tasks set by the state and society.

1. Burdina EV. The Russian model of organizational support for the activities of courts. Rossijskoe pravosudie [Russian Justice]. 2023;(3):9-20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37399/issn2072-909X.2023.3. 9-20.

2. Ermakov AV. Digitalization of justice and artificial intelligence. Law and Legislation. 2024;(4):26-30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2073-3313-2024-4-26-30.

3. Katalkina MYu, Kuzmina EYu, Savchenko AV. Problems of the development of digital management. E-Management. 2022;5(1):52-58. (In Russ.).

4. Kulakov VV, Aryamov A A. Digital justice: possibilities and limits. Rossijskoe рravosudie [Russian Justice]. 2024;(5):18-25. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37399/issn2072-909X.2024.5.18-25.

5. Lungu EV. Constitutional Human Rights and Freedoms in the light of Digitalization of Public Relations. Lex russica. 2025;78(3):86-97. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2025.220.3.086-097.

6. Naumov DM, Kutuzova AS. Organization of interdepartmental information interaction between the territorial bodies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia and units of other law enforcement agencies. Vedomosti ugolovno-ispolnitelnoy sistemy. 2017;9:55-60. (In Russ.).

7. Nechiporuk DO. Issues of Interaction Between Internal Affairs Bodies and Attorneys. The Horizons of Humanities Knowledge. 2022;2:18-25. (In Russ.).

8. Starostin SA. Current issues of administrative law and administrative process. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).

9. Stepanenko YuV. Logic of Transformations in Executive Power. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2019;(6):73-80. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2019.58.6.073-080.

10. Stupachenko EV. Digitalization of prosecutor’s activities as a necessary condition of functioning of prosecution authorities in the information society development conditions. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2024;9:81-84. (In Russ.).

11. Udalov DV. Digital transformation of socio-economic space. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialno ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2020;3(82):33-36. (In Russ.).

12. Zubarev SM. Legal Risks of Digitalization of Public Administration. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(6):23-32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.115.6.023-032

13. Zvyagin LS. Metasystem approach in economics and management. Voprosy ekonomiki i upravleniya. 2016;4(06):6-11. (In Russ.).

14. Zyryanov AV. System approach in modern legal studies. The Rule of Law State: Theory and Practice. 2018;4(54):47-53. (In Russ.).