Dangerous State of the Individual and the Grounds for Criminal Liability: Doctrinal and Normative Experience
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2026.230.1.121-133
Abstract
The paper examines the evolution of the concept of criminal liability through the prism of the interaction between fundamental categories of criminal law: crime; the person who committed the crime; and criminal liability. From this perspective, it analyzes the historical development of criminal law doctrines from the classical school to modern conceptions. Particular attention is given to the concept of the dangerous state of the individual, developed by the anthropological and sociological schools. A comparative analysis is conducted of moderate and radical approaches to defining the grounds for applying criminal law measures. The implementation of these concepts in Soviet criminal legislation of the 1920s is analyzed. The study demonstrates the transformation of views on criminal liability during the Soviet period, including the shift from the radical ideas of the sociological school to the traditional understanding of crime as the basis for criminal liability. It is revealed that radical attempts to justify criminal liability based on the potential danger of an individual were rejected as contrary to the idea of human freedom. The results of the study show that in modern Russian criminal law, the sole ground for liability is a socially dangerous act. Information about the offender’s personality is recognized as significant in determining measures of criminal law impact. The conclusions of the work confirm the need for a differentiated approach to the grounds and measures of criminal law impact, where the act is the determining factor and personal characteristics are an additional criterion.
About the Author
V. N. KuflevaRussian Federation
Valentina N. Kufleva, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology
Krasnodar
References
1. Cherlyunchakevich NA. On the Criminal Code: Report [4th All-Russian Congress of Soviet Justice Figures: Morning session on January 27]. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii. 1922;5:9. (In Russ.).
2. Chubinsky MI. The science of criminal law and its constituent elements. Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii. 1902;7:97-166. (In Russ.).
3. Conceptual and theoretical foundations of legal regulation and application of measures. Shchedrin NV, editor. Krasnoyarsk; 2010. (In Russ.).
4. Dukhovskoy MV. The tasks of the science of criminal law. Introductory lecture, delivered on October 3, 1872. Vremennik Demidovskogo yuridicheskogo litseya. Yaroslavl; 1873. Book 4. Pp. 220–252. (In Russ.).
5. Estrin AYa. Russian criminal law. General Part. Issue I: Fundamentals and history of criminal law. Moscow; 1935. (In Russ.).
6. Gertsenzon AA. Basic principles and provisions of the draft Criminal Code of the USSR: A report. Proceedings of the first scientific session of the All-Union Institute of Law, January 27 — February 3, 1939. All-Union Institute of Law of the NKYu USSR. Moscow; 1940. Pp. 141–157. (In Russ.).
7. Goncharov NV. The ideas of the «third school» in criminal legislation and Russian Law of 1917–1926. Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. 2011;3:28. (In Russ.).
8. Kadnikov NG. Dangerous state of personality as the basis of criminal responsibility. Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2020;1:50-55. (In Russ.).
9. Kolotkov MB. The punitive policy of the Soviet state in 1917–1922: Legislation and practice. Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.).
10. Krylenko N. Explanatory note to the draft Criminal Code. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii. 1925;38-39:1232- 1239. (In Russ.).
11. Krylenko NV. Towards a critique of the recent past (draft of the Criminal Code of 1930). Problems of Socialist Law. Collection 1. In: Krylenko NV, editor. Vsesoyuzny institut yuridicheskikh nauk NKYu SSSR. Moscow; 1937. P. 6 9. (In Russ.).
12. Loba VE. The «recipes» of the fight against crime of the sociological school of criminal law. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo [Tomsk State University Journal. Law]. 2013;4(10):100-107. (In Russ.).
13. Lyublinsky PI. On the effect of punishment. In: Petrazhitsky LI, editor. New ideas in jurisprudence. A periodical collection. Collection One: The aims of punishment (compiled by Professor Lublinskiy PI). St. Petersburg; 1914. P. 1–13. (In Russ.).
14. Mikhailov VI. The Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1922: Issues of development and characteristics of the theoretical framework and institutions of the General part. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2024;28(5):100-115. (In Russ.).
15. Mokrinsky SP. System and methods of criminal law science. St. Petersburg; 1906. (In Russ.).
16. N. P. On the expulsion by court sentences of persons recognized as socially dangerous. Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii. 1923;12:266-269. (In Russ.).
17. Naumov AV. Crime and punishment in the history of Russia. In 2 parts. Part 1. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).
18. Okuneva MO. The subject of crime in Soviet criminal law. Formation and development of the Institute in 1917–1941. Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).
19. Piontkovskiy AA. Social protection measures and the Criminal Code of the RSFSR. Soviet Law. Zhurnal Instituta sovetskogo prava. 1923;3(6):12-52. (In Russ.).
20. Prince A. Protection of society and the transformation of criminal law. Translated from French. E. Markelova. Feldstein GS, editor, foreword. Moscow; 1912. (In Russ.).
21. Safronova EV, Loba VE. «Dangerous state of personality» as a criminological category. Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava [Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law]. 2014;2:10-17. (In Russ.).
22. Sakharov AB. On the identity of the criminal and the causes of crime in the USSR. Moscow; 1961. (In Russ.).
23. Shvekov GV. The first Soviet Criminal Code. Moscow; 1970. (In Russ.). Slavin I. Is criminal unreliability punishable (towards the theory of a dangerousness). Ezhenedelnik sovetskoy yustitsii. 1922;8:1 4. (In Russ.).
24. Spasovich VD. New directions in the science of criminal law. Moscow; 1898. (In Russ.).
25. Stankevich V. Combating a dangerousness as the main task of the new criminal law. In: Petrazhitsky LI, editor. New ideas in jurisprudence. A periodical collection. Collection One: The aims of punishment (compiled by Professor Lublinskiy PI). St. Petersburg; 1914. P. 78–135. (In Russ.).
26. Suleymanov AA. The Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1922. Conceptual foundations and general characteristics. The author’s abstract of Cand. Diss. (Law). Moscow; 2007. (In Russ.).
27. Traynin AN. The doctrine of the elements of the crime. Moscow; 1946. (In Russ.).
28. Zhizhilenko AA. Social protection measures for dangerous criminals. Report presented to the 8th Congress of the Russian Group of the International Union of Criminologists. St. Petersburg; 1911. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kufleva V.N. Dangerous State of the Individual and the Grounds for Criminal Liability: Doctrinal and Normative Experience. Lex Russica. 2026;79(1):121-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2026.230.1.121-133
JATS XML





















