Preview

Lex Russica

Advanced search

Transformation of Foundations of Legal Thinking in Russian Jurisprudence in the Second Half of 20th and the Beginning of 21st Centuries

https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.146.1.020-028

Abstract

The article highlights the basic lines due to which Soviet jurisprudence is becoming less Marxist and more neo-Kantian. This is the logic and methodology of the science, ontology and axiology. The very structure of theoretical knowledge — ontology, epistemology (logic + methodology), axiology — is accidental for both authentic Marxism and for later developed “Leninism.” The logic appeared the first in this sequence, inevitably followed by neokantian metaphysics that, however, remains behind the scenes of teaching and does not find its implementation in scientific research.

During the Thaw, the Moscow Methodological Circle rehabilitated neo-Kantians idea of methodology as a special section of the theory of cognition. A slightly different fate befell the ontology of law that for seven decades had been evolving from the denial of law (bourgeois law under socialism) and socialist law thinking (law as a social order, exchange attitude and a set of orders of government) to a “broad” or “liberal” approach to law (the distinction between law and the law act). Regardless of logic, methodology and ontology, neo-Kantianism manifests itself in ethics, which is terminologically fixed even in the term “axiology.”

About the Author

V. I. Przhilenskiy
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Russian Federation

Przhilenskiy Vladimir Igorevich, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology 

125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9



References

1. Alekseev S. S. Teoriya prava [Theory of Law]. Moscow, Bek publ., 1995. (In Russian)

2. Voskobitova L. A., Przhilensky V. I. Sotsialnye tekhnologii i yuridicheskoe poznanie : monografiya [Social technologies and legal knowledge : A monograph]. Moscow, Norma publ., Infra-M publ., 2017. 176 p. (In Russian)

3. Wundt V. Ocherki psikhologii [Essays on psychology]. Moscow, Moscow Publishing House, 1912. (In Russian)

4. Zakharova M. V. Rossiyskaya pravovaya sistema: problemy identifikatsii i razvitiya [A Russian Legal System: problems of identification and development]. Lex Russica. 2008. Vol. 67. No. 2, P. 243—259. (In Russian)

5. Martyshin O. V. Filosofiya prava : uchebnik dlya magistrov [Philosophy of Law : A Textbook for Master’s Students]. Moscow, Prospekt publ., 2017. (In Russian)

6. Nazarov V. N. Opyt khronologii russkoy etiki XX v.: tretiy period (1960—1990) obshchaya kharakteristika tretego perioda [The Experience of Russian ethics chronology in the 20th century: The third period (1960— 1990). General characteristics of the third period]. Eticheskaya mysl [Ethical thought]. Issue 1. Moscow, 2000. P. 107—131; Eticheskaya mysl [Ethical thought]. Issue 2. Moscow, 2001. P. 169—191. (In Russian)

7. Nikitaev V. V. Metodologiya i vlast: Kant [Methodology and power: Kant]. Metodologiya nauki: problemy i istoriya [Methodology of science: Problems and history]. Moscow, 2003. (In Russian)

8. Przhylenskaya I. B. Zhiznennyy mir i tselevye ustanovki rossiyskikh studentov [Lifeworld and target setting of the Russian students]. Tsennosti i smysly. 2016. No. 4 (44). P. 22—29. (In Russian)

9. Przhylenskaya I. B. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i sotsialnaya modernizatsiya [Information society and social modernization]. Gumanitarnye i sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki [Humanitarian and socio-economic sciences]. 2006. No. 3 (22). P. 14—18. (In Russian)

10. Svintsov V. Sushchestvuet li dialekticheskaya logika? [Does Dialectical Logic Exist?]. URL: http://ecsocman. hse.ru/data/488/964/1217/011_Svintsov.pdf. (In Russian)

11. Sergodeeva E. A. Ratsionalnost sovremennogo filosofskogo diskursa [Rationality of modern philosophical discourse]. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya [Humanitarian and Law Studies]. 2014. No. 2. P. 135—138. (In Russian)

12. Sergodeeva E. A. Sotsialno-kommunikativnyy kharakter nauchnoy deyatelnosti [Social and communicative nature of scientific activity]. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo federalnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the North Caucasus Federal University]. 2014. No. 6 (45). P. 314—317. (In Russian)

13. Zakharova M., Przhilenskiy V. Two Portraits on the Background of the Revolution: Pitirim Sorokin and Mikhail Reisner. Russian Law Journal. 2017. No. 5 (4). P. 193—212. (In Russian)

14. Przhilenskiy V., Zakharova M. Which way is the Russian double-headed eagle looking? Russian Law Journal. 2016. No. 4 (2). P. 6-25. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Przhilenskiy V.I. Transformation of Foundations of Legal Thinking in Russian Jurisprudence in the Second Half of 20th and the Beginning of 21st Centuries. Lex Russica. 2019;(1):20-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.146.1.020-028

Views: 546


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-5920 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7869 (Online)