Using Digital Technologies in Criminal Cases in Court: Reality and Prospects

The paper deals with topical issues related to the use of digital technologies in criminal proceedings. The author presents the directions of digitization of the court and the principles of using artificial intelligence, formulated by the bodies of the Council of Europe. The stages of the emergence of individual digital technologies first in the work of arbitration courts, and later — courts of general jurisdiction are shown. Existing and promising digital technologies are considered as the criminal case moves, after its submission in court from the Prosecutor. Considerable attention is given to the order of formation of the court for the consideration of a particular criminal case. The author analyzes the difficulties encountered in the use of an automated information system in this matter, and proposes ways to resolve them. The author considers it necessary to use e-mail to call victims, witnesses and other participants in the proceedings, for which he proposes to make appropriate changes to the current procedural legislation. The article reveals the current procedure and prospects for the use of video conferencing systems, audio and video recording of the trial in the criminal process. The author reports on the experimental development of speech recognition programs for participants in the trial. Special attention is given to the achievements in the implementation of digital technologies in the Moscow courts, implemented in the course of the international project «Support for judicial reform». In this regard, the author describes the creation of electronic copies of traditional «paper» cases in the courts of Moscow, making the proceedings more open.

1. Bulgakova E.V., Denisov I.S., Bulgakov V.G. Kiberpravosudie [Cyber-justice]. Administrator suda [Court’s Administrator]. 2018. No. 4.

2. Bukharov A.V. Obespechenie obektivnogo i nezavisimogo raspredeleniya del mezhdu sudyami kak effektivnaya mera profilaktiki korruptsii v rayonnom sude [Ensuring an objective and independent distribution of cases between judges as an effective measure to prevent corruption in the district court]. Administrator suda [Court’s Administrator]. 2016. No. 2.

3. Vlasova S.V. K voprosu o prisposablivanii ugolovno-protsessualnogo mekhanizma k tsifrovoy realnosti [On the question of adapting the criminal procedure mechanism to the digital reality]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchniy zhurnal [Criminalist’s Library Scientific Journal]. 2018. No. 1.

4. Volkov V. Chto meshaet sudu stat nezavisimoy vetvyu vlasti [What prevents the court from becoming an independent branch of power]. Vedomosti. 2018, 27 Dec.

5. Egorova O.A., Chairman of the Moscow city court. «Iz soveshchatelnoy komnaty mne nikto ne zvonit» [«No one calls me from the conference room»]. Kommersant. 2018, June 18.

6. Egorova O.A., Chairman of the Moscow city court. Interview to Agency «Interfax», 26.12.2018 . URL: https://www.interfax.ru/interview/643992 (accessed: 16.03.2018).

7. Zakirov R.F. Ispolzovanie sovremennykh IT-tekhnologiy kak sredstvo dostizheniya osnovnykh zadach sudoproizvodstva [The use of modern IT-technologies as a means of achieving the main objectives of the proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Herald of Civil Procedure]. 2018. No. 1.

8. Makarova O.V. Sovershenstvovanie sudoproizvodstva putem vnedreniya elektronnoy formy ugolovnogo dela [Improvement of legal proceedings by introduction of electronic form of criminal case]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian law]. 2019. No. 2.

9. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya «Sud XXI veka: tekhnologii na sluzhbe pravosudiya» [International conference «Court of the XXI century: Technology in the service of justice»]. 29 and 30 May, 2018: final collection of papers. Moscow, 2018.

10. Ponomarenko V.A. Elektronnoe grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossi. Shtrikhi kontseptsii [Electronic civil proceedings in Russia. Touches of the concept]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 2015.

11. Momotov V.V. Chairman of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation. Kachestvo, operativnost, dostupnost. O kriteriyakh sotsialnoy effektivnosti sudebnoy vlasti [Quality, efficiency, availability. On the criteria of social efficiency of the judiciary]. Vystuplenie na parlamentskikh slushaniyakh soveta federatsii po teme «Voprosy obespecheniya garantiy prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina» 21 noyabrya 2018 g. [Speech at the parliamentary hearings of the Federation Council on «Issues of ensuring guarantees of human and civil rights and freedoms» on November 21, 2018]. Advokatskaya gazeta [Attorney’s Gazette]. No. 24 (281). 16—31 December 2018.

12. Khalikov A.N. Sootnoshenie sovremennoy informatsionnoy sfery s gosudarstvennoy monopoliey na rassledovanie ugolovnykh del pri ispolzovanii tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [The ratio of the modern information sphere with the state monopoly on the investigation of criminal cases with the use of digital technologies in criminal proceedings]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchniy zhurnal [Criminalist’s Library Scientific Journal]. 2018. No. 3.

13. Chucha S.Yu. Elektronnoe pravosudie. Elektronnyy dokumentooborot [E-justice. Electronic document circulation]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 2018.

14. Sharifullin R.A., Burganov R.S., Bikmeev R.G. Elementy elektronnogo pravosudiya [Elements of electronic justice]. Rossiyskiy sudya [Russian judge]. 2018. No. 6.