European Court and the problem of perception of state sovereignty: comparative measurement

The European Court of Justice, created in the early 1950s, has significantly expanded its powers. The main factor in the expansion of European law was national courts addressing the European Court of Justice for interpretations (in 19932009 saw from 200 to 300 prejudicial inquiries per year; the number has risen up to 400 and even exceeded this figure since 2010, which is not that much for three dozens of member states). The court recognized the emergence of the European legal system in the 1960s. (Case Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen; Costa v. ENEL; International Handelsgesellschaft). It approved the principle of free movement of goods and services in 1970. Such court decisions as "Dassonvill","Cassis de Dijon","Omega" became quite well-known. In the 1990s, the Court paid even more attention to humanitarian issues. However, not all the decisions of judicial authority are public oriented. Basically, they do not count the state's interests in two types of cases: 1) associated with the intervention of the Member States jurisdiction under the pretext of protection of the fundamental principles of European law, and 2) relating to the interpretation of the expansion of the European Union citizenship. These spheres of life are particularly controversial for certain countries, national budgets and the sovereignty (potentially troublesome in the future as an artificially stimulating immigration is the case of Gerardo Riuz Zambrano v. Office national de l'emploi). The same are the cases of labor disputes that undermine trade union rights (pay attention to the Viking Line case; Laval). Sometimes, certain states, politicians and lawyers angered by the judicial expansion. National courts rarely show open discontent of the European Court, but apparently refrain from making prejudicial questions en masse. Public opinion in Europe shows less and less confidence in the European Court of Justice. This is especially true for Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal, the UK, Cyprus (confidence level is only about 30-35% or less).

European integration, EU court system, European Court of Justice, expansion of judicial powers, decisions of European Court on economical disputes, decisions of European Court on humanitarian and social problems, sovereignty of European countries, European public opinion, impeachment of European Court of Justice

1. Tamm D. The History of the Court of Justice of the European Union Since Its Origin // The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law. The Hague, 2013. P. 16, 17

2. Марченко М. Н. Европейский Союз и его судебная система: монография. М., 2012, С. 151-152

3. Энтин К.В. Право Европейского Союза и практика Суда Европейского Союза. М., 2015, С. 60-61

4. Lenarts K. The Court's Outer and Inner Selves: Exploring the External and Internal Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice // Judging Europe's judges. The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court Justice / Ed. by M. Adams, H. de Waele, J. Meeusen and G. Straetmans. Oxford and Portland, 2013. P. 34-36

5. Саломатин А.Ю. Всемирная история государства и государственного управления. М., 2013.

6. Jacobs F G. The Court of Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Challenges Ahead for the Judicial System? // The Court of Justice and the Constitution of Europe: Analysis and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law. The Hague, 2013. P. 49.

7. Schwarze J. Balancing EU Integration and National Interests in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice // The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe. P. 267.

8. Европейское право. Право Европейского Союза и правовое обеспечение защиты прав человека / рук. авт. кол. и отв. ред. Л. М. Энтин. М., 2012. С. 336.

9. Mazak J., Moser M. K. Adjucation by Reference to General Principles of EU Law: A Second Look at the Mangold Case Law // Judging Europe's Judges. P. 61-86.

10. Herzog R., Gerken L. Stopt der Europaischen Gerichtshof // Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 08.09.2008

11. Azoulai L. «Euro-Bonds». The Ruis Zambrano judgement or the Real Invention of EU Citizenship // Perspectives on Federalism. 2011. Vol. 3. Issue 2. E31-39.

12. Rasmussen H. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice. A Comparative Study in Judicial Policy-Making. Dordrecht, 1986;

13. Neill P. The European Court of Justice. A Case Study in Judicial Activism. L., 1995;

14. Hartley T.C. 4QR. Vol. 95. № 112 (1996).

15. Wyrzykowski M. When Sovereignty Means So Much: The Concept(s) of Sovereignty, European Union Membership and the Interpretation of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland // The Court of justice. P. 229-243.

16. Bobeck M. Of Feasibility and Silent Elephants: The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice Through the Eyes of National Courts // Judging Europe's Judges. P. 197, 200.

17. Европейское право. Право Европейского Союза и правовое обеспечение защиты прав человека. С. 332.

18. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion

19. Право Европейского Союза / под ред. С. Ю. Кашкина. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. М., 2011. С. 365, 366

20. Snell J. The Legitimacy of Free Movement Case Law: Process and Substance. P. 118.

21. Tamm D. The History of the Court of Justice of the European Union Since Its Origin // The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe. P. 29.

22. Dougan M. The Bubble That Burst: Exploring the Legitimacy of the Case Law on the Free Movement of Union Citizens // Judging Europe's judges. P. 129.

23. Azoulai L. "Euro-Bonds". The Ruis Zambrano judgement or the Real Invention of EU Citizenship // Perspectives on Federalism. - 2011. - Vol. 3. - Issue 2. - E31-39.

24. Herzog R., Gerken L. Stopt der Europaischen Gerichtshof // Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. - 08.09.2008.

25. Jacobs F.G. The Court of Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Challenges Ahead for the Judicial System? // The Court of Justice and the Constitution of Europe: Analysis and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law. - The Hague, 2013.

26. Lenarts K. The Court's Outer and Inner Selves: Exploring the External and Internal Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice // Judging Europe's judges. The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court Justice / еd. by M. Adams, H. de Waele, J. Meeusen and G. Straetmans. - Oxford and Portland, 2013.

27. Neill P. The European Court of Justice. A Case Study in Judicial Activism. - L., 1995.

28. Rasmussen H. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice. A Comparative Study in Judicial PolicyMaking. - Dordrecht, 1986.

29. Tamm D. The History of the Court of Justice of the European Union Since Its Origin // The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law. - The Hague, 2013.

30. Европейское право. Право Европейского Союза и правовое обеспечение защиты прав человека / рук. авт. кол. и отв. ред. Л.М. Энтин. - М., 2012.

31. Марченко М.Н. Европейский Союз и его судебная система: монография. - М., 2012.

32. Право Европейского Союза / под ред. С.Ю. Кашкина. - М., 2011.

33. Энтин К.В. Право Европейского Союза и практика Суда Европейского Союза. - М., 2015.